Lionel Messi | Joins Inter Miami (pg4111)

[nmc]

Bartomeu is a dirty b@stard. He leaks news in media first to create pressure on the players.

Barcelona have to sell Suarez to sign players. Problem is suarez is saying give the a year's Salary and I will leave.
Ironically they asked the same for messi 700M or nothing.

Good going Suarez.. lmao!!!

Bartomeu seems to struggle with the concept of contracts... he thinks he can interpret them however he sees fit. Suarez is due a year and may have a claim to a second year which he is prepared to waive. I think the pandemic is starting to push Barca's finances over the cliff... here's hoping.

 

[mosssideblue]

I did mention that there were 3 parts to this Messi deal, the 3rd being can Barca pay Messi if his sponsors go under?
As for the transfer i do not think Messi wants to leave, i believe he is going for a boardroom job, using City was done with Pep and the owners full support, because when this is all over and the press are telling the world on how little City missed out again, the financial world has acknowledged City as the biggest club in the world. The only ones that could pull this coup off.

You need to change medication

 

[remember arthur mann]

hopefully this is all gearing up for leo to join us asap!

 

[salfordbluetrue]

You need to change medication

Fair do`s, what is your reasoning for City`s owners, allowing City to get pulled through the mud for yet another Messi, Barca bitch fight?, Messi does not want to leave, he does not want to go home he wants a job for life,
As for Barca being able to pay Messi? that is where we are now, with Barca desperate to offload, 3 weeks to see if it is Messi or everyone else

 

[BoyataIsGod]

Fair do`s, what is your reasoning for City`s owners, allowing City to get pulled through the mud for yet another Messi, Barca bitch fight?, Messi does not want to leave, he does not want to go home he wants a job for life,
As for Barca being able to pay Messi? that is where we are now, with Barca desperate to offload, 3 weeks to see if it is Messi or everyone else

I find it highly unlikely that City will have willingly been a pawn in Messi’s so called bid to get a ‘job for life’ . Do you seriously think that a huge organisation such as CFG would waste their time and resources to simply further the ambitions of a player that the company owes nothing to? A bizarre thought process at the very least!

 

[mosssideblue]

Fair do`s, what is your reasoning for City`s owners, allowing City to get pulled through the mud for yet another Messi, Barca bitch fight?, Messi does not want to leave, he does not want to go home he wants a job for life,
As for Barca being able to pay Messi? that is where we are now, with Barca desperate to offload, 3 weeks to see if it is Messi or everyone else

You came up with a whacky conspiracy theory against which I commented. You are now stating what comes over as being facts, I think again, you are simply speculating.

Q, how exactly were we pulled through the mud _ facts though please

 

[mosssideblue]

I find it highly unlikely that City will have willingly been a pawn in Messi’s so called bid to get a ‘job for life’ . Do you seriously think that a huge organisation such as CFG would waste their time and resources to simply further the ambitions of a player that the company owes nothing to? A bizarre thought process at the very least!

Exactly

 

[salfordbluetrue]

I find it highly unlikely that City will have willingly been a pawn in Messi’s so called bid to get a ‘job for life’ . Do you seriously think that a huge organisation such as CFG would waste their time and resources to simply further the ambitions of a player that the company owes nothing to? A bizarre thought process at the very least!

But City did go through the processes necessary to get the deal in situ, they would have known that Messi could and can walk, and they would have known Messi does this every year, the only thing Bizarre is your belief that City have not gained, or perhaps you do not understand what this huge organisation wants?

 

[sir baconface]

I did mention that there were 3 parts to this Messi deal, the 3rd being can Barca pay Messi if his sponsors go under?
As for the transfer i do not think Messi wants to leave, i believe he is going for a boardroom job, using City was done with Pep and the owners full support, because when this is all over and the press are telling the world on how little City missed out again, the financial world has acknowledged City as the biggest club in the world. The only ones that could pull this coup off.

Ridiculous to think City would go along with that. The most likely explanation for the Messi saga is that he fancied us but not sufficiently to hold his nerve when Bartolomeu called his bluff.

I’d like us to draw a line under the whole cocktail of prick teasing and politicking and move on. We’re nearing the start of a new season and still have important stuff to do.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

You came up with a whacky conspiracy theory against which I commented. You are now stating what comes over as being facts, I think again, you are simply speculating.

Q, how exactly were we pulled through the mud _ facts though please

You come out with that statement and then demand facts? obviously i am speculating very few have the facts, just my speculation has been more accurate,
If you want a fact City have been dragged through the mud of every failed transfer, and that is part of the reason we win on the Messi deal, `We are the only club capable of getting Messi`A fact not missed on the Financial world

 

[mosssideblue]

You come out with that statement and then demand facts? obviously i am speculating very few have the facts, just my speculation has been more accurate,
If you want a fact City have been dragged through the mud of every failed transfer, and that is part of the reason we win on the Messi deal, `We are the only club capable of getting Messi`A fact not missed on the Financial world

Your talking gibberish now mate, but at least you admitted to being a kfa.

 

[manimanc]

Fair do`s, what is your reasoning for City`s owners, allowing City to get pulled through the mud for yet another Messi, Barca bitch fight?, Messi does not want to leave, he does not want to go home he wants a job for life,
As for Barca being able to pay Messi? that is where we are now, with Barca desperate to offload, 3 weeks to see if it is Messi or everyone else

For about the 100th time we havent been pulled through the mud with Messi.
Name me one source/headline that states we was ever in for him and/or made a bid or shown interest.
Just one!

I just wish people would think before they post as your post is just full of nonsense.

 

[TheThirdDeano]

For about the 100th time we havent been pulled through the mud with Messi.
Name me one source/headline that states we was ever in for him and/or made a bid or shown interest.
Just one!

I just wish people would think before they post as your post is just full of nonsense.

Bluemoon, aside from having only 5% of the posts it does have, would be way less fun if anyone stopped to think about their posts!

 

[Cobwebcat]

Your talking gibberish now mate, but at least you admitted to being a kfa.

I suspect you’re wasting your time unfortunately. The number of people who think City have somehow been used. The reason used to be to get more money now, when it appears he is going to be asked to cut his wage, its any number of mad cap theories.

The facts are as clear as day but some will always choose to not see them for what they are...he wanted to leave but was prevented. He tried everything and might still go this window or in the future.

Laughable that of all the people he could use and drag through the mud he chooses his friends apparently it’s just that the CFG are stupid.

Lastly not one of Messi’s actions to date required City to do anything we were only required if he left.

To be used City would have to be worse off or Messi better off.

Neither has happened so let’s make something up to fit Messi being an evil genius.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

Your talking gibberish now mate, but at least you admitted to being a kfa.

You asked for a fact i gave you one, then you say i admit to kfa, i did not admit to that, that is your assumption and is factually incorrect.

 

[Centurions]

For about the 100th time we havent been pulled through the mud with Messi.
Name me one source/headline that states we was ever in for him and/or made a bid or shown interest.
Just one!

I just wish people would think before they post as your post is just full of nonsense.

Drugs, just say no...

 

[FCBarca]

Whatever you do, don’t google it...

Thread title is poor if not ignorant stereotype of spanish speakers? Mambo is neither Argentinian nor Spanish.

Malambo, sure but Mambo?

 

[Centurions]

You asked for a fact i gave you one, then you say i admit to kfa, i did not admit to that, that is your assumption and is factually incorrect.

Actually I think it's the general feeling of this thread at least.

Are you claiming to be ITK, because you post as if you don't even know what day it is?

 

[mosssideblue]

I suspect you’re wasting your time unfortunately. The number of people who think City have somehow been used. The reason used to be to get more money now, when it appears he is going to be asked to cut his wage, its any number of mad cap theories.

The facts are as clear as day but some will always choose to not see them for what they are...he wanted to leave but was prevented. He tried everything and might still go this window or in the future.

Laughable that of all the people he could use and drag through the mud he chooses his friends apparently it’s just that the CFG are stupid.

Lastly not one of Messi’s actions to date required City to do anything we were only required if he left.

To be used City would have to be worse off or Messi better off.

Neither has happened so let’s make something up to fit Messi being an evil genius.

Spot on. Makes you wonder what runs through peoples minds at times.

 

[mosssideblue]

You asked for a fact i gave you one, then you say i admit to kfa, i did not admit to that, that is your assumption and is factually incorrect.

I dont believe it is, but hey ho each to their own