artfuldodger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 1,416
Ive been out and about. At 11 my phone showed 'BBC BREAKING NEWS. MANCHESTER IN TIER 3'. And yet I cant see anything to say thats the case?
My veggie farts are pretty impressive tbf
As for GM numbers rising fast. Are they?
The last 9 days total cases from GM have been:
1888, 1542, 1845, 941, 1455, 1533, 1445, 1521, 1415.
Whatever else these numbers are they are not really rising let alone rising fast.

Decision on Manchester tier change 'not looking likely today'Ive been out and about. At 11 my phone showed 'BBC BREAKING NEWS. MANCHESTER IN TIER 3'. And yet I cant see anything to say thats the case?
All lined up for a press statement from GM leaders at 11am in central Manchester. But it was postponed as discussions with govt go on about putting GM/Lancs into Tier 3. Talks going on & GM leaders waiting for another call with No 10. Decision today not looking likely now... https://t.co/O4oDBztxcm
— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) October 15, 2020
It's going to require a monumental effort to fix test and trace at this point, the virus is too prevalent across the country now - the amount of resource required to trace 20k cases each day is surely enormous.Test and trace only found 62% of those being sought last week. When are they going to sort out the single most important thing to control this virus - seven months after realising this was true?
It has been obvious for months this should be in local hands who know the area they are tracking and tracing and can GO there not send a text.
Yet we are still using people on government contracts looking for contacts by phone hundreds of miles away.
Not rocket science why it is failing.
That's because it's not.Ive been out and about. At 11 my phone showed 'BBC BREAKING NEWS. MANCHESTER IN TIER 3'. And yet I cant see anything to say thats the case?
If the Manchester numbers continue to fall it might not happen. They could be wishful thinking of course.That's because it's not.
Not yet.
Is this not the reason why Burnham, et al, are arguing why we shouldn’t be put in tier 3 - that the numbers have peaked and may well be on their way back down?As for GM numbers rising fast. Are they?
The last 9 days total cases from GM have been:
1888, 1542, 1845, 941, 1455, 1533, 1445, 1521, 1415.
Whatever else these numbers are they are not really rising let alone rising fast.
Depends what day it is whether he thinks it should be a full lockdown or stay in 2.Is this not the reason why Burnham, et al, are arguing why we shouldn’t be put in tier 3 - that the numbers have peaked and may well be on their way back down?
So a premature leak.? pretty unprofessional from the beeb.That's because it's not.
Not yet.
What i needed to hear. TaGuys, why can't we all just try to get along, certainly in these times and in this thread?
I'm telling my kids every day that everything will be alright in the end, it has to be.
We're all losing jobs and businesses, we're losing our health, we're losing a lot more come the light at the end of this dark tunnel...
But let's not lose hope or rationale, nor the ability to debate with civility, certainly towards people we have no clue how they may be coping in their own ways.
We aren't calling the shots, but when I leave this thread each day, it's in the firm belief I can look my two in the eye when they come home from school. I might have had a shit day, I might be on my arse financially, but we can't let this fucking thing beat us or become a self-fulfilling prophesy that we are all fucked.
Dzeko has headed us level and we would do well now to remember that you can never stop believing there is always another chance.
Now there is a surprise......As for GM numbers rising fast. Are they?
The last 9 days total cases from GM have been:
1888, 1542, 1845, 941, 1455, 1533, 1445, 1521, 1415.
Whatever else these numbers are they are not really rising let alone rising fast.
Yes, I have been involved with a few contracts with penalty clauses but they aren’t the norm. That said, in a contract of this value, with a dubious provider and where I’d imagine it would be doable to have success / failure KPIs, I would expect there to be penalty clauses. Maybe that wasn’t practicable.Many services contracts don't have penalty clauses. In fact I've been writing IT services contracts (as a vendor) for 30 years and have hardly ever included them. Lazy reporting from click-bait shit stirrers.