And what if his circuit breaker hasnt worked? An extension?Wales first minister announces he will not take the country into the regional lockdown tier system as in England but will have a simple to understand one nation restrictions policy to take over from the circuit breaker.
I echo that , so very sorrySincere condolences to Lucah Archie on here - his dad passed away today after picking up Covid earlier this week.
Take care Blue.
Wales data not shoeing much sign the circuit breaker is working yet.
Deaths 11
Cases 1737 at 14% positive of tests.
Only an idiot relies on faith.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...antibodies-neutralize-virus-five-months.html?
For every study saying one thing, there's another saying something different. I think you know deep down that immunity will last longer than 4 months in most people.
Yeah this is the big danger , everyond must get a flu jab this yearA woman in California tests positive for BOTH flu and Covid at the same time.
The doctors stress that this could become a problem this winter and the flu injection is more vital than ever.
No i dont , so dont try and put that on me , neither do youhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/...antibodies-neutralize-virus-five-months.html?
For every study saying one thing, there's another saying something different. I think you know deep down that immunity will last longer than 4 months in most people.
They were indeed right. Sadly lockdowns are not working particularly well for short periods and they will totally trash the economy if in place for a long time. If we put long term lockdowns in place there will be a depression not a temporary economic blip.The UK scientists advising the government did say a month or so ago that we would be at 50,000 cases and 200 deaths a day around now if we did not act.
Looks like they got that prediction right.
>> It is not a right wing disbelief in science.It is not a right wing disbelief in science. It is a libertarian attitude to restriction of freedom. Hence why folks like Corbyn's brother are out protesting.
Pronouncements on a temporary loss of liberty have to be backed by facts not theories. I.e. Evidence has to be provided and government scientists have frankly been shite at producing the evidence.
As important is the fact that governments rarely relinquish draconian powers once acquired.
Produce evidence and make sure powers are time limited and more folks would be prepared to accept them.
And would likely be denied one with a slight cough.At best any country in Europe is.
It's the asymptomatic nature of the virus and the fact that many people pass it off as a slight cough so don't even bother to book a test
No i dont , so dont try and put that on me , neither do you
It says
Coronavirus immunity can last up to five months - and maybe even longer - in the majority of survivors, a new study suggests
It’s libertarian ideology that doesn’t always equate to freedoms for society. It can be more focussed on self-interest and resisting “inconvenience” like you wrote.>> It is not a right wing disbelief in science.
I disagree - it is largely so. Conservatives whom I've interacted with believe that:
1) Wearing masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is ineffective/unnecessary;
2) Vaccinations are far more risky than any potential benefit that they may provide; let nature take its course, providing natural immunity once people catch and then recover from disease;
3) Vaccinations are a bigger threat to my children than not vaccinating - I don't want my child to end up autistic;
4) I don't believe in climate change - so , just as a double check, I'll conduct my own (absolutely unscientific) experiment - I'll pick a date, say 10/11 and I'll look at the temperature on that date over the last 50 years where I live - and what do you know? - as I thought, we're actually cooling - believe it or not, this from an intelligent Master's Degree college graduate...
And so on...
I do agree that the reason for pushback against science seems to be rooted in "restriction of freedom" - but which I'd alternatively characterize as "rejection of inconvenience" - as exploited by the right-leaning politicians.
Well seen as though 92% still had antibodies and 70% had strong levels I think it's safe to say that they will still have them for a while yet. You stated that they only last 4 months which in 92% of cases is disproved in this study. From what I have read even if you don't have traceable antibodies you can still be immune.
Good analogy here from a virologist.
You can wish all you want , until a dr tells me i am certainly immune for x amount of time nothing is certain