Harry Kane

BufordUSABlue said:
I have a pal who supports Spuds (he was manager of a very large Manchester City Center hotel) and absolutely they are deluded. Constantly goes on (and on and on!) about how big a club they are (with no supporting evidence!) and get this, pretty much debt free with only the stadium cost stopping them right now. When i tell him without Kane and Son, they are not even top 10 material, he goes off on (yet another) rant about how big they are.....
Deluded doesn't even begin to describe him!
Click to expand...
Weirdly, Spurs have always had a massive support in south and mid wales. Probably dates back to the days of Cliff Jones but pretty much every time I’ve been there I’ve heard valleys accents
 
Why Liverpool fans have got it all wrong about Harry Kane's 100m move to Manchester City. That is the scouse echo's headline on newsnow if you want a laugh. Sort of saying Liverpool do everything the right way in the transfer market , have a sound structure etc etc, but other clubs obviously not naming any have a more scattergun approach, implying that we sign ten players every window or something. Not tech savvy enough to put a link on, but it's just so typical of that special lot from murkyside
 
metalblue said:
The situation is the situation, doesn’t matter what prices may have been pre-COVID or if he played for us. Obviously that excludes if you’re Woodward of course ;)

The reports in the media last night were bonkers. “City have offered £100m package and if that doesn’t tempt Levy City will add a player”, So Levy are you tempted? Erm no mate I’ll have the £100m plus a player. BBC saying earlier no offer has been made but one is expected, which I’m inclined to think more likely, rest is speculative nonsense.
Click to expand...

i think its to much £100milion because of the age and injuries he picks up each season
spurs know kane wants out and playing bluff with turning it down ? maybe city should try and get some info on kane contract at spurs and buy the contract out
 
funny thing about this kane deal was early on before the end of the season i was told by a good mate with links to city that kane was coming to city and sterling going to spurs ?

i got battered on here and everybody laughed at player swaps ? they don't do players swaps anymore its 2021
also got told by the same guy that city have got plans for 2 strikers and both are 90% done deals
 
ancoats said:
funny thing about this kane deal was early on before the end of the season i was told by a good mate with links to city that kane was coming to city and sterling going to spurs ?

i got battered on here and everybody laughed at player swaps ? they don't do players swaps anymore its 2021
also got told by the same guy that city have got plans for 2 strikers and both are 90% done deals
Click to expand...
We don’t do player swaps though and I doubt at the end of this window that would have changed.
 
ancoats said:
funny thing about this kane deal was early on before the end of the season i was told by a good mate with links to city that kane was coming to city and sterling going to spurs ?

i got battered on here and everybody laughed at player swaps ? they don't do players swaps anymore its 2021
also got told by the same guy that city have got plans for 2 strikers and both are 90% done deals
Click to expand...
Sterling won’t go to Spurs.Neither would Laporte or Jesus.
 
Is Kane worth £100 mill no.
Is Haaland worth £150 mill no.
However this is the going rate.
If we cant get Haaland then i would go for Lukaku who despite what people think scored goals at Wba and Everton a bottom 6 team and a lower mid table side.He also scored goals at an upper mid table side while he was there.He is a 1 In 2-3 games striker however coming into his prime and presented with the chances we pass up could become more prolific.He would also offer us something else as currently we cross the ball to the diddymen who win nothing with Lukakau there is also a chance of scoring from the knockdowns.It would also give opposing defences something else to worry about instead of the constant side to side and then looking for the perfect pass or killer ball.Having said all that Kane or Haaland would score bucketloads for us and that is what we are missing.
 
The problem Levy has with the Kane deal is recouping enough cash to buy a player who will do the same thing as Kane does for them.

We're going to have to break out the piggy bank in a big way to land him, and it's going to have to be early enough for Levy to source a replacement.
 
Fordyboy46 said:
Why Liverpool fans have got it all wrong about Harry Kane's 100m move to Manchester City. That is the scouse echo's headline on newsnow if you want a laugh. Sort of saying Liverpool do everything the right way in the transfer market , have a sound structure etc etc, but other clubs obviously not naming any have a more scattergun approach, implying that we sign ten players every window or something. Not tech savvy enough to put a link on, but it's just so typical of that special lot from murkyside
Click to expand...
Is this the reason they and others bemoan us having the best squad in the prem then?
Contradiction as always from the Dippers
 
ancoats said:
funny thing about this kane deal was early on before the end of the season i was told by a good mate with links to city that kane was coming to city and sterling going to spurs ?

i got battered on here and everybody laughed at player swaps ? they don't do players swaps anymore its 2021
also got told by the same guy that city have got plans for 2 strikers and both are 90% done deals
Click to expand...

You're saying this like it's been proven that your mate hasn't been talking utter shite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top