Harry Kane

[melrose40yarder]

Is Kane worth £100 mill no.
Is Haaland worth £150 mill no.
However this is the going rate.
If we cant get Haaland then i would go for Lukaku who despite what people think scored goals at Wba and Everton a bottom 6 team and a lower mid table side.He also scored goals at an upper mid table side while he was there.He is a 1 In 2-3 games striker however coming into his prime and presented with the chances we pass up could become more prolific.He would also offer us something else as currently we cross the ball to the diddymen who win nothing with Lukakau there is also a chance of scoring from the knockdowns.It would also give opposing defences something else to worry about instead of the constant side to side and then looking for the perfect pass or killer ball.Having said all that Kane or Haaland would score bucketloads for us and that is what we are missing.

 

[pudge]

Sorry mate, not really sure what you expected to be honest? Was always just a chat about it all. Literally no different to this thread that you're reading.

Neither of you called each other a **** though?

 

[blueparrot]

Haaland would stay three years then leave. He looks up to bludy CR7, he likes that Ronaldo played in different leagues at RB in a interview he said he wants to replicate what CR7 did. Whoever gets Haaland won't have him long 2 to 3 years max.

The Ronaldo that did 9 years at Madrid?

 

[melrose40yarder]

First sentence says reportedly, journalist speak for we guessed but want to make it sound researched.

None of those players are going to sign for Spurs big backward step.

 

[mexico1970]

The problem Levy has with the Kane deal is recouping enough cash to buy a player who will do the same thing as Kane does for them.

We're going to have to break out the piggy bank in a big way to land him, and it's going to have to be early enough for Levy to source a replacement.

 

[Kippax77]

Why Liverpool fans have got it all wrong about Harry Kane's 100m move to Manchester City. That is the scouse echo's headline on newsnow if you want a laugh. Sort of saying Liverpool do everything the right way in the transfer market , have a sound structure etc etc, but other clubs obviously not naming any have a more scattergun approach, implying that we sign ten players every window or something. Not tech savvy enough to put a link on, but it's just so typical of that special lot from murkyside

Is this the reason they and others bemoan us having the best squad in the prem then?
Contradiction as always from the Dippers

 

[Grealish’s Shinpads]

We don’t do player swaps though and I doubt at the end of this window that would have changed.

Cancelo/Danilo?

That’s what they mean when they say a player swap. Two separate deals but essentially a swap.

That being said I really can’t see any of our players wanting to play for Spurs…

 

[Xhavenjoe]

Cancelo/Danilo?

That’s what they mean when they say a player swap. Two separate deals but essentially a swap.

Did we do something similar with Otamendi and Dias

 

[Tugay One Cup]

funny thing about this kane deal was early on before the end of the season i was told by a good mate with links to city that kane was coming to city and sterling going to spurs ?

i got battered on here and everybody laughed at player swaps ? they don't do players swaps anymore its 2021
also got told by the same guy that city have got plans for 2 strikers and both are 90% done deals

You're saying this like it's been proven that your mate hasn't been talking utter shite.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Did we do something similar with Otamendi and Dias

Cancelo/Danilo was at the same time, Otamendi was a couple of days after Dias. Guess they had a quick scan of the market and couldn’t find anyone better for less money, so took the general.