What is the difference in hospitalisations and deaths from an epidemic that spikes and one that is broad but low i.e. never hits the same heights but rolls on longer? It could be that there is no difference.The problem with this thought process is that even if every single restriction is removed on 19th of July and we go back to a December 2019 kind of lifestyle, it isn't 'after Covid'.
As in, its not actually gone. Infact it's likely to be as rife as ever with very high case numbers at that point, some people can pretend it's gone and live like it's gone but it's absolutely not, so for others that means they have to proceed with caution.
Then we go back to what's actually being asked for here, it's not that the original poster wants everyone double jabbed before football stadiums can be full, or before household number restrictions are removed, she's simply asking for a period where we continue to wear masks so that she can do the very basic aspects of life in the current situation - go to the shops, use transport to get to where she needs to go, until such times more people are double jabbed and case levels are hopefully under control.
I understand its a risk for her to visit the shops just now even with mask wearing, but really what is the point in increasing that risk and doesn't her request seem fair at all to you?
IMO whilst we had the prospect of vaccines, restrictions made sense. But now 95% of those who are going to be vaccinated so the case for restrictions gets weaker imo.
It needs to be modelled over the long term to see what is the best route. Before we knew for certain that social distancing and restrictions would control and reduce deaths. Now I think you might just get two different curves with similar areas underneath them.
