The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement

Would you be happy if City joined this European Super League?

  • Yes

    Votes: 109 5.3%
  • No

    Votes: 1,954 94.7%

  • Total voters
    2,063
This never ending saga is all because the club couldn’t keep their IT system secure and allowed a low level hacker access to the entire archive of emails.

Whilst on a football level the club is undeniably well run you have to say that this fundamental lapse in security and the recent ticketing fiasco suggests that operationally it is poor in the extreme. Ordinarily you’d expect heads to roll but that doesn’t seem to be the case so maybe there is a culture of complacency pervading?
Absolute tripe bud.

Have you seen what this 'low level hacker' actually had stored on his hard drives? Presuming it was just him, he managed to hack what seems to be the entire Portuguese criminal system including the anti-hacking team themselves.
 
Absolute tripe bud.

Have you seen what this 'low level hacker' actually had stored on his hard drives? Presuming it was just him, he managed to hack what seems to be the entire Portuguese criminal system including the anti-hacking team themselves.

What made him target Man City? If I ever knew I’ve forgotten!
 
Absolute tripe bud.

Have you seen what this 'low level hacker' actually had stored on his hard drives? Presuming it was just him, he managed to hack what seems to be the entire Portuguese criminal system including the anti-hacking team themselves.
With respect I’d suggest you are deluding yourself.

There was no encryption of any mails on the server so as far as I’m concerned that is gross negligence on the part of the club.
 
In 2020 City were "fined" for refusing to cooperate with UEFA's investigation into alleged breaches of FFPR. CAS felt that the whole matter could have been settled much more quickly, and without reference to CAS, had the club provided UEFA with the documents requested at the outset. City cooperated fully with CAS and the relevant documents, along with City's accounts, showed there was absolutely no evidence at all of any breaches and proved conclusively that the club had not attempted to disguise owner investment as sponsorship income. These latest judgements mean that City will have to hand over documents to the PL arbitration panel which has the right to "investigate". It is, however, hard to see that there can be any material not considered by the exhaustive CAS proceedings and the judges were clearly irritated by the very slow pace at which the PL investigation was proceeding - this is the significance of his remarks about legitimate interest in the transparency of charges, proceedings and judgements, that the club does not yet even know whether it will face any charges at all and that City have won the title twice in the time the PL has taken NOT to reach a decision. It seems the PL are sitting twiddling their thumbs hoping some new evidence will materialise like a genie out of a bottle of whatever SAF's favourite tipple is.
 
In 2020 City were "fined" for refusing to cooperate with UEFA's investigation into alleged breaches of FFPR. CAS felt that the whole matter could have been settled much more quickly, and without reference to CAS, had the club provided UEFA with the documents requested at the outset. City cooperated fully with CAS and the relevant documents, along with City's accounts, showed there was absolutely no evidence at all of any breaches and proved conclusively that the club had not attempted to disguise owner investment as sponsorship income. These latest judgements mean that City will have to hand over documents to the PL arbitration panel which has the right to "investigate". It is, however, hard to see that there can be any material not considered by the exhaustive CAS proceedings and the judges were clearly irritated by the very slow pace at which the PL investigation was proceeding - this is the significance of his remarks about legitimate interest in the transparency of charges, proceedings and judgements, that the club does not yet even know whether it will face any charges at all and that City have won the title twice in the time the PL has taken NOT to reach a decision. It seems the PL are sitting twiddling their thumbs hoping some new evidence will materialise like a genie out of a bottle of whatever SAF's favourite tipple is.
Excellent summary
 
Absolute tripe bud.

Have you seen what this 'low level hacker' actually had stored on his hard drives? Presuming it was just him, he managed to hack what seems to be the entire Portuguese criminal system including the anti-hacking team themselves.
No doubt Pinto was a professional hacker but City were very complacent. Anyone in business knows that emails are not secure for highly sensitive information. They are not appropriate for confidential business matters. Yet our highly-paid senior Execs saw fit to share tactless jokes about the death of a UEFA official and other private financial discussions.
Sensitive discussions should have all been on a secure encrypted network. This is basic stuff which even the smallest public bodies adhere to. In many other organisations heads would certainly have rolled. It was on a smaller scale but don't forget that Garry Cook lost his job for tasteless email comments about Nedum's mother.
 
Remember limitation can't apply if they haven't even been charged. I'm confident the Limitation Act will still apply unless the PL accuse City of deception - even then the bar is high under the recent caselaw.

Thanks projectriver for your time on effort on here. Its much appreciated from people without a legal background.

So as above if we argue that the Limitations Act applies and are successful then any evidence before the summer of 2015 will be excluded from the investigation?

If this is the case then the two and half year delay has been great for out case. So you think that has been our strategy?

Will the procedure will be similar to the UEFA investigation?

PL investigate and decide if charges are merited.
Charge City.
Hearing both side put case before panel..
Decision.
CAS if goes against us.

?
 
Last edited:
Surely it's time to put up or shut up for any body that's supposedly still investigating us?

We had the UEFA stench hanging over us for what seemed years and doing no end of damage to our reputation driven by hacks like Delaney. Whatever the final result enough mud was slung for some of it to stick.

It's the same with this premier league fiasco. It's always there in the background allowing the haters in the media to keep on publishing " City still facing sanctions/under investigation by the premier league" stories every few months. Let's have it done once and for all!
 
In 2020 City were "fined" for refusing to cooperate with UEFA's investigation into alleged breaches of FFPR. CAS felt that the whole matter could have been settled much more quickly, and without reference to CAS, had the club provided UEFA with the documents requested at the outset. City cooperated fully with CAS and the relevant documents, along with City's accounts, showed there was absolutely no evidence at all of any breaches and proved conclusively that the club had not attempted to disguise owner investment as sponsorship income. These latest judgements mean that City will have to hand over documents to the PL arbitration panel which has the right to "investigate". It is, however, hard to see that there can be any material not considered by the exhaustive CAS proceedings and the judges were clearly irritated by the very slow pace at which the PL investigation was proceeding - this is the significance of his remarks about legitimate interest in the transparency of charges, proceedings and judgements, that the club does not yet even know whether it will face any charges at all and that City have won the title twice in the time the PL has taken NOT to reach a decision. It seems the PL are sitting twiddling their thumbs hoping some new evidence will materialise like a genie out of a bottle of whatever SAF's favourite tipple is.
If you could pick 10 guests past and/or present to have round for a dinner party, you'd be getting an invite pal.
Putting a like to your post doesn't seem enough
 
Hi Tolm. Clearly many fans are worried and also angry about the repetition in these attacks. Your chum analogy is great yet can be seen with a slightly different perspective. Apparently, in layman terms sharks can detect 3 drops of blood in a volume of water equivalent to that found in a municipal swimming pool. The Mail need only discover titbits of information which they can then spin to their hearts content over several weeks. Job done and worth the trouble and investment to those who hate us.

Do you have any impression how worried our leaders are about this?

Absolutely none. We clearly treated it seriously enough to pay the top legal people to try and win the appeal.

I suspect it might have more to do with the third part ownership accusations and image right set-up, as that is another area of attack.
 
In 2020 City were "fined" for refusing to cooperate with UEFA's investigation into alleged breaches of FFPR. CAS felt that the whole matter could have been settled much more quickly, and without reference to CAS, had the club provided UEFA with the documents requested at the outset. City cooperated fully with CAS and the relevant documents, along with City's accounts, showed there was absolutely no evidence at all of any breaches and proved conclusively that the club had not attempted to disguise owner investment as sponsorship income. These latest judgements mean that City will have to hand over documents to the PL arbitration panel which has the right to "investigate". It is, however, hard to see that there can be any material not considered by the exhaustive CAS proceedings and the judges were clearly irritated by the very slow pace at which the PL investigation was proceeding - this is the significance of his remarks about legitimate interest in the transparency of charges, proceedings and judgements, that the club does not yet even know whether it will face any charges at all and that City have won the title twice in the time the PL has taken NOT to reach a decision. It seems the PL are sitting twiddling their thumbs hoping some new evidence will materialise like a genie out of a bottle of whatever SAF's favourite tipple is.
It looks as if the PL are adopting the same failed strategy as UEFA. They are leaving the investigation "on the table" to placate our commercial rivals, specifically LFC and MUFC. But they have absolutely no evidence and are not actually carrying out any investigation. They are happy for the "stench" to remain around City in the meantime.
When the whole issue goes out of time they can blame City for "not co-operating and say: "We did the best we could." Meanwhile LFC and MUFC can brief the media (as they did last time) saying: "City are guilty really but it was all time-barred."
I think this is what the judge is really driving at with his comments about delays in the probe. In legal terms he is saying to the PL: "Put up or shut up."
PL boss Richard Masters is happy to drag things out because that will please the senior directors at LFC and MUFC (who vetted him for his job). The only question that remains for me is: "Who gave Javier Tebas an off-the-record heads-up on progress in this legal case?" My money is on Masters blabbing to someone at LFC or MUFC who then blabbed to Tebas. It probably happened at one of the Euros junkets.
 
Absolutely none. We clearly treated it seriously enough to pay the top legal people to try and win the appeal.

I suspect it might have more to do with the third part ownership accusations and image right set-up, as that is another area of attack.
Tolm. Thanks for the reply. I guess the FAs disinterest and response to the hacking (as recently mentioned) and the punishment meted out to Wayne Rooney’s Derby County and others who have sinned against FFP should provide us with some reassurance that even if skeletons do emerge the punishment is likely to be limited. If they want go down the misrepresentation of accounts or accounting practices i foresee a heap of litigation and a lawyers dream.

i do understand the clubs reluctance to disclose heaps of material. There is bound to be something that is damaging or is even innocent but that could be spun against us.

If the Club are worried about the third party ownership with the Dare to Dream etc and worry (say) about another transfer embargo they should get their skates on and get some players signed.
 
Tolm. Thanks for the reply. I guess the FAs disinterest and response to the hacking (as recently mentioned) and the punishment meted out to Wayne Rooney’s Derby County and others who have sinned against FFP should provide us with some reassurance that even if skeletons do emerge the punishment is likely to be limited. If they want go down the misrepresentation of accounts or accounting practices i foresee a heap of litigation and a lawyers dream.

i do understand the clubs reluctance to disclose heaps of material. There is bound to be something that is damaging or is even innocent but that could be spun against us.

If the Club are worried about the third party ownership with the Dare to Dream etc and worry (say) about another transfer embargo they should get their skates on and get some players signed.
This investigation is linked to the Der Spiegel accusations from late 2018 that UEFA also investigated us for.
 
Absolutely none. We clearly treated it seriously enough to pay the top legal people to try and win the appeal.

I suspect it might have more to do with the third part ownership accusations and image right set-up, as that is another area of attack.
Its probably FFP I think as the investigation started the day after the UEFA one but it’s not impossible it’s something else.

I hope you are right and it’s not FFP as any punishment wouldn’t be as bad I think.
 
Tolm. Thanks for the reply. I guess the FAs disinterest and response to the hacking (as recently mentioned) and the punishment meted out to Wayne Rooney’s Derby County and others who have sinned against FFP should provide us with some reassurance that even if skeletons do emerge the punishment is likely to be limited. If they want go down the misrepresentation of accounts or accounting practices i foresee a heap of litigation and a lawyers dream.

i do understand the clubs reluctance to disclose heaps of material. There is bound to be something that is damaging or is even innocent but that could be spun against us.

If the Club are worried about the third party ownership with the Dare to Dream etc and worry (say) about another transfer embargo they should get their skates on and get some players signed.
Agree with you about disclosing material. UEFA had no credible evidence of wrongdoing and neither do the PL. Why should we allow them to conduct a fishing expedition with our confidential business information? They have done nothing previously that suggests we should trust them. UEFA leaked like a sieve throughout their process and someone is already apparently briefing Javier Tebas on this probe (he is hardly a friend of the PL either)
There will be plenty of content in our documents that we don't want in the public domain. It doesn't make it illegal. The most damaging things in the Der Spiegel stuff was not much the financial stuff but the boasting: "We can do what we want" and the tasteless jokes about dead UEFA officials etc etc.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top