Harry Kane

abu13 said:
I really am hoping that we can get this deal over the line, I am also hoping that the rumours that the Grealish fee is actually around the £75 million mark rather than the £100 million.

I have a feeling we will get him but it will mean saying goodbye to Bernardo, I guess when Saul finally moves on we will see this start to heat up again
Click to expand...
It suits Villa and the media to make out it's £100m but it just seems to have become accepted fact by being repeated so often. It will be interesting to see what City say. I suspect it's around £75m because I can't see an agent setting a release fee at £100m
 
We all know (after the Juve ex chaiman confirmed it - if not before) that the real fee for Pogba 120m + 40m euros agents fees = 160m euros means just under £140million. So in the real world, we may not break the record for either, but that won't fit the narrative around us.
 
Last edited:
abu13 said:
I really am hoping that we can get this deal over the line, I am also hoping that the rumours that the Grealish fee is actually around the £75 million mark rather than the £100 million.

I have a feeling we will get him but it will mean saying goodbye to Bernardo, I guess when Saul finally moves on we will see this start to heat up again.
Click to expand...
Hope Saul doesn’t end up at Utd.
 
mccity said:
Is the Athletic scoop of 130m based on anything in reality? I don't see how they'd know that.
Click to expand...
They don't. It's another ballpark guess.

The Athletic is on the outside of club pooled briefings, people would do well to remember this in future.

The guys who left to join them had to accept that the national patch journos would no longer accept/share with a paid-for online rival being looped in to what the club was sharing on a daily basis.

They have to develop contacts elsewhere, which is clearly difficult for many of them.
 
Kave Solekhol claims City's offer for Kane was £75m plus players. When pressed on where the £150m fee comes from he had nothing other than City are under investigation for FFP as if 2010 is relevant to 2021.
 
Marvin said:
Kave Solekhol claims City's offer for Kane was £75m plus players. When pressed on where the £150m fee comes from he had nothing other than City are under investigation for FFP as if 2010 is relevant to 2021.
Click to expand...
Yea and apparently Spurs don’t want any of our players lol…subbed ;)
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
I didn't know that, presumably to make money on spurs when they sell in the future?. I think the spurs fan is saying they haven't actually pumped any direct cash in for the manager to spend?
Click to expand...
Agree with that....was meaning,they pumped money in to buy the club....all them shares in that post was after they paid Sugar for his shares.
 
marco said:
now Grealish is over the line i can see this one gathering pace tomo onwards, my guess deal by Tue at 130m plus add ons done a week today
Click to expand...

I don't think we'll see anything happen on this until after we play them, even if he isn't fit to be considered for either side I just think it would be a bad move for Spurs to do that and over shadow the match.
 
wolviedinho said:
£160m is a made up media figure.

The real figure will be £100m + addons.

Grealish £75m +£25m

Kane £100+£20m

City may have money but we ain’t stupid.
Click to expand...

Surely the only thing that matters is what Levy will accept. And you don't seem to have included that in your excellent and informative post.

City may not be stupid but many people on here say Levy is a bit thick. This could be a bloodbath when your "not stupid" City folk take on the thick Levy.

I feel a bit sorry for him
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top