Harry Kane

I just think it gets done with a bit of tinkering

£120m up front

a few addons

we can not or should be held to account by anybody ? manchester city are better than that and should have options other than kane. we known from the last couple of weeks of the last season right up to now we need a striker
so why gamble on one player

make spurs one offer and if not move on
it will be there lost because spurs are not going anywhere with kane and turn down £100million for a player that is 28 is crazy. £100million to spurs is like £200million in the transfer market. they could build another team and be in a far better shape
 
Bellingham is the one for me. Better buy than Sancho or Saka, or even Haaland (if we get Kane this summer) imho. I would love to see us replace Fernandinho’s place in the squad with him.
(… Now let me work this out, he’d be half his age, is that right ….?)
I would like both (Haaland) in a double swoop tbh but your point was a good one
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.