The slaughtered lamb
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2014
- Messages
- 4,619
I can’t see Spurs borrowing £250m to pay off debt then spending half of it on players if they’re well run. Kane will come to us for £120-130m.
Sly Sports News this Morning.
Guy bottom left.
"Are City killing the 'romance of football by signing Grealish and Kane?"
He then waffles on about both players being 'one of their own', etc.
During this Sam Lee looked perplexed and started smirking and smiling.(see picture)
![]()
Sam Lee has been told by Spurs sources he knows Levy and Spurs are still adamant they are not selling Kane. Lee said City are still confident of signing Kane. Lee thinks City will eventually get Kane done at some point after the Spurs match.
May well be, but I just think for spurs they won't want to go into the first game and Nunos first official competative game with it a circus about Kane.
If he is still there all talk and attention will be about him especially if in the ground, if we already have him, we leave him in Manchester and give him the weekend to move house.
Both teams will want the game preperation and day to be the focus, not Kanes transfer.
In my opinion getting it done this week suits both better.
I am probably wrong tbh though and this will drag on.
"As long as there are no further lockdowns"Spurs fan in peace.
We are a well run club ofcourse financially. I have seen some post here alluding to Spurs going towards financial oblivion interms of debt. Yes, it does look huge. Covid really did hurt us the most in PL given so much dependent on revenues from stadium. But we will fine...as long as there is no further lockdowns.
Our only issue is, no focus given football side in last 3-4 years. But things are quite optimistic this summer with Fabio Paratici, new DoF, already doing some smart deals and Levy taking a step back from making transfer negotiations.
As for as Kane, fan base is extremely disappointed in how he has gone about things, especially given, fans were on his side till May, even if he was leaving us.
As for as any potential transfer - City set the marker themselves. Having paid Grealish 100m, the minimum fair value expected for Spurs will be 160m. Ball is on city court. If they come up with that valuation, deal will happen.
Yeh i could guess that tbfSly Sports News this Morning.
Guy bottom left.
"Are City killing the 'romance of football by signing Grealish and Kane?"
He then waffles on about both players being 'one of their own', etc.
During this Sam Lee looked perplexed and started smirking and smiling.(see picture)
![]()
Sam Lee has been told by Spurs sources he knows Levy and Spurs are still adamant they are not selling Kane. Lee said City are still confident of signing Kane. Lee thinks City will eventually get Kane done at some point after the Spurs match.
May well be, but I just think for spurs they won't want to go into the first game and Nunos first official competative game with it a circus about Kane.
If he is still there all talk and attention will be about him especially if in the ground, if we already have him, we leave him in Manchester and give him the weekend to move house.
Both teams will want the game preperation and day to be the focus, not Kanes transfer.
In my opinion getting it done this week suits both better.
I am probably wrong tbh though and this will drag on.
I tweeted that bellend a picture of kane as a young lad In his arsenal shirt with the caption one of our own lol. Soft lad blocked me instantly ha haThat prick on the bottom left is Jamie Weir who just so happens to be................ a spurs fan!