Harry Kane

Hydemcfc said:
How much are clubs going to be willing to pay for a 29yr old Kane next season?, 50-60 million, especially when Haaland becomes available at 67 million. Is Levy really going to be prepared to drop Kane’s price by nearly 90-100 million. If he’s really the hard nosed business man he would have everyone believe I can’t see him doing that, but of course I could be and probably am totally wrong.
Click to expand...
If he doesn't get his move this week, he will spend the rest of his career at Spurs and look back in years to come with an empty trophy cabinet and a thousand regrets
 
Hydemcfc said:
How much are clubs going to be willing to pay for a 29yr old Kane next season?, 50-60 million, especially when Haaland becomes available at 67 million. Is Levy really going to be prepared to drop Kane’s price by nearly 90-100 million. If he’s really the hard nosed business man he would have everyone believe I can’t see him doing that, but of course I could and probably am totally wrong.
Click to expand...

It would depend on what Kane does. If he threw his toys out and refused to play all season then yeah he would have to sell him but I don't think Kane would shit on Spurs like that. I think if this deal doesn't happen he would go back to giving 100% for the team and it would all be forgotten by their fans. I think that is what Levy is banking on by refusing to sell and begrudgingly I think he is right.
 
samuelyeboah said:
difference is I want kane and think it'll happen, but fucking hell was it really necessary to leave it to the end of the window like that
Click to expand...
We always knew that to try and sign Kane would be difficult due to the stubborness of Levy and add onto that the lateness of players coming back from the Euros.
Will he, wont he ? Guess all will be revealed within the next week or so.
I have more patience than most but sincerely believe that all those working behind the scenes are trying the best to get this over the line.
One thing I do know ... all of us have NO real knowledge at to where we are with this transfer except those truly in power at the club.
 
daztrueblue91 said:
Jesus played 29 league games last season and scored 9 goals. That’s similar or less than Harvey Barnes, Callum Wilson, Jesse Lingard and Thomas Soucek.

I think the biggest problem with him is that he can easily go 4 games without scoring and then score a hat trick against some shite side in the CL. His stats then jump from 0 goals in 4 games to 3 goals in 5 games.

I’ve said numerous times that he’s a very good player, especially on the wing. But I don’t think he’s good enough to be the main striker for a club competing for the CL and PL title.
Click to expand...

He started 21 games and scored 9 goals, in a season he was playing while injured a lot.

Season before he started 21 and scored 14 in those games.

I'm not interested in a discussion about Jesus with anyone who tries to include 5 minute sub appearances in his goal record.

If the club was worried about competing without a new striker, we wouldn't be putting all our egg in that basket. He's the only striker on the market good enough to improve us over Jesus and the false 9s and the club knows Kane might not get done and is OK with it.
 
deano ou812 said:
Was it not posted on here ( not this thread) that he wasn’t going out on loan after all Stoke I think were favourites but he’s staying now,unless I’ve got my wires crossed..
Click to expand...
As far as I understood its dependant on whether we get Kane or A.N.Other.If we do then a loan is going to happen for the lad.
 
blueparrot said:
Which is a fair enough POV. However the club aren't stupid, so either they have looked for available alternatives and have one, or they have looked and don't see one that either fits or more likely is short term but would want a longer deal and prevents us next summer getting a better altenative that might become available for arguments sake Haaland or Mbappae. Whatever happens they will have thought long and hard about it and have reasons for whatever they do or don't do.
It may be there are alternatives to Kane but alternatives not as good as the alternatives that would be available next summer.The alternative to Kane may be to play the longer game.
Click to expand...
That last bit is really interesting, do you think that's what happened the summer Kompany left?
 
Anything can happen, but if we have ignored every other striker that was available, and probably an easier transfer, then we must be pretty confident this can happen. Not sure why there would be so much confidence unless Spurs have told them something, but clearly something has gone wrong if its taken so long to close. I suspect it's more to do with Spurs finding it hard to get someone in of any caliber, given all they have to offer right now is European Conference football and maybe challenging top 6.
 
Hydemcfc said:
How much are clubs going to be willing to pay for a 29yr old Kane next season?, 50-60 million, especially when Haaland becomes available at 67 million. Is Levy really going to be prepared to drop Kane’s price by nearly 90-100 million. If he’s really the hard nosed business man he would have everyone believe I can’t see him doing that, but of course I could be and probably am totally wrong.
Click to expand...

What is it that makes you think that bargains will be gifted to those that wait?
And would you like to buy some magic beans?


Haaland won’t be available for £67M.
That figure is merely his release clause, the amount Dortmund get.
If he’s sold it will be for full market value (the maximum amount that the market will bear) and the difference between £67M and market value will go to Haaland, his fat agent and his sponging Dad.
The difference may be expressed as signing on fees, Daddies bungs, fat agent fees and / or ridiculous salary but Raiola will ensure that they don’t miss out on one cent of potential gain.
 
DontLookBackInAnger said:
well clearly it would seem not. I know football is all about opinion but going into a full season with the striker(s) we have will be season objectively as a real weak point in the team and like Centreback a couple of years ago it seems to be something we could have addressed but failed.
Click to expand...
I'd let the window close before claiming that
 
OccupiedPalestineBlues said:
What is it that makes you think that bargains will be gifted to those that wait?
And would you like to buy some magic beans?


Haaland won’t be available for £67M.
That figure is merely his release clause, the amount Dortmund get.
If he’s sold it will be for full market value (the maximum amount that the market will bear) and the difference between £67M and market value will go to Haaland, his fat agent and his sponging Dad.
The difference may be expressed as signing on fees, Daddies bungs, fat agent fees and / or ridiculous salary but Raiola will ensure that they don’t miss out on one cent of potential gain.
Click to expand...
Which is the precise reason why Haaland and his 'people' aren't interested in moving this summer
 
domalino said:
He started 21 games and scored 9 goals, in a season he was playing while injured a lot.

Season before he started 21 and scored 14 in those games.

I'm not interested in a discussion about Jesus with anyone who tries to include 5 minute sub appearances in his goal record.
Click to expand...

I’m not interested in discussion with someone who excludes his substitute appearances from the stats but keeps the goals he scored from those substitute appearances in them.
 
DontLookBackInAnger said:
That last bit is really interesting, do you think that's what happened the summer Kompany left?
Click to expand...
No, I think that was different, I think they thought we would be okay with Fernandinho as our spare centre back. They didn't expect either of Stones form and fitness problems, nor Laportes season long injury, because we didn't reallly try and replace him Think that was a miscalculation.
I think this is different because we are trying very hard to get Kane in, I think the lack of alternatives, if it is we don't have one, maybe we do, would be because our alternative targets to Kane aren't available this summer and we don't want to gum up the squad with a stop gap that would make it difficult to bring a striker in next summer.
Just my guess though, I know nothing and still expect us to get Kane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top