Harry Kane

kun said:
a. In many cases it publicises and/or fomalises a players desire to leave.
b. In most contracts, a formal transfer request would forgo their loyalty bonus.
Click to expand...
A) he did an interview on sky sports which pretty formal expressed his desire to leave
B) if this is written into his contract yes but there would probably be an argument to say that he would lose loyalty bonuses due to doing an interview saying he wants to leave to win trophies
 
peter.evans said:
We let Aguero go because he was finished two season ago !
Click to expand...
Your right sadly, Aguero like a lot of footballers played from 15/16 years old at the top level succumb to injury earlier in their careers.
kun said:
Is it just me or are the wheels beginning to turn?...
Click to expand...
ye backwards by the sounds of it.
 
Bustergonad said:
A) he did an interview on sky sports which pretty formal expressed his desire to leave
B) if this is written into his contract yes but there would probably be an argument to say that he would lose loyalty bonuses due to doing an interview saying he wants to leave to win trophies
Click to expand...
a. I used "In many cases" for a reason. In Kane's case that point is irrelevant.
b. I'm not sure exactly why, but that isn't how it works. Formal transfer requests forgo loyalty bonuses but general public statements, generally, don't.
 
GaudinoMotors said:
Who the fuck does ratboy think he is and how can Sly allow his juvenile, biased rants?
Click to expand...

Glazers out again? Oh no, that's all quiet since they bought Sancho and Varane. That bullshit protest was purely because they couldn't cope with Liverpool beating them at home and us being confirmed as champions again, like when they lost at home to West Brom. He showed his true colours when he stirred all that up and it was a disgrace that sky gave him the platform to do it.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
I just have a gut feeling City will walk away. I suspect the main issue will be the way Levy does all his negotiations via briefing his pals in the media. City hate this sort of thing. It's what caused all the bad blood in the UEFA/CAS case. Lots of negotiations end up being more about the personalities involved than the money.
Levy will be hailed as a hero by the press for "standing up to oil-money City." He will get pats on the back next time he meets his pals at the PL meeting but meanwhile damage will have been caused in the Spurs dressing room which will undermine the team. For me this is why Levy has been so unsuccessful at Spurs. He doesn't make pragmatic decisions. It's all about his ego.
I spoke to quite a few Spurs fans at the game last week and the view of all of them was: "If Kane doesn't want to play for us then sell him and spend the money wisely." Not a single one said keep Kane. They were real supporters...not banter boys on Twitter.
Click to expand...
All this was common knowledge way before we made Kane our number one target. Why didn't we develop a back up plan?
 
manimanc said:
View attachment 24558
He went a bit like this.

Said utd need more time, Sancho money was last years money, which I don't believe for one minute.
Said if we get kane then utd will be left behind.
Said we countless times.
Very professional he was and very neutral.
Click to expand...

I despise that twat with a passion. Incredibly biased. Both him and spit the dog need booting.
 
Bellamy's Caddy said:
Glazers out again? Oh no, that's all quiet since they bought Sancho and Varane. That bullshit protest was purely because they couldn't cope with Liverpool beating them at home and us being confirmed as champions again, like when they lost at home to West Brom. He showed his true colours when he stirred all that up and it was a disgrace that sky gave him the platform to do it.
Click to expand...
Beat me to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top