Harry Kane

JPBB said:
@Dribble

Thank you for your long post. It gave me great pleasure and deserves a response.



That is really your problem. Not mine. Or anyone else's. I agree the Liverpool fans were disgusting.



Of course not. It is not a secret that Spurs is being set-up for sale to one of the Big Tech giants. Hence the American Football. Whether that will happen who knows?



In a previous post, I tried to explain that your good fortune helped Spurs break into the top 4 by knocking out first Liverpool and then Arsenal and then United. This allowed Spurs in. And now there is a top 6.

There is a section of fans that do mock the less fortunate. You explain why above. It does not define the club but it exists.



Agreed.

Also your typo, intentional or not, is very true. Every City fan I meet claims to have been there that day. A bit like the famous Sex Pistols concert.



I feel it. I am a Spurs fan. I cannot relax even at 3-0 up (see West Ham, etc)



I agree.

Some people on here might suppose I believe that but I don't. Spurs are not competing for the title. But I do want the best for Spurs and that is screwing you or United for as much money as we can for Kane. City are not relevant to Spurs. We can't compete with your cash and nor do we expect to beat you.



I stand to be corrected but I think Spurs were one of the few clubs that did not support FFP. Levy's view was that it might discourage a potential buyer.



Yes. It is the business model. It is part of the plan.

That is why the Italian centre back signs for us. If he is as good as he says he is, he'll get his move to United or Real Madrid or whoever in a couple of years and Spurs make a few quid.



I did. Banned from them all. I was slightly more cruel to them than I have been here. They are a bit thick.

I think you should consider yourself an elite club. If you don't, that could explain some of the spikiness on here.



I don't really feel bitter or jealous. It is not my intention to come across like that.

My intention is to appear arrogant and patronising.



Thank you. I have done that.

God, I love isolation.
Click to expand...
You might want to edit your third from last sentence. Or maybe not...
;-)
 
TheGoat said:
The point being made is that it can be used as leverage for the player.
Click to expand...
For something to be useful as leverage there has to be a genuine possibility of it happening otherwise its nothing but an empty threat. They threaten levy with that, he will laugh at them.
 
horlock_was_super said:
I am 57 in October and been following City for as long as I can remember.

Jimmy Hills wage campaign, £100,000 footballers were a thing when I first started attending Maine Road.

Bosman, Premier League, Champions League and endless substitutions and far too many other things have happened in that time, don't get me started on VAR, to recall in my Holts addled memory.

Things that we never thought we would see have happened, Levy appears to be on the cusp of a revolution that no other chairman will thank him for in the future if Kane invokes the Webster ruling. There has to be a first, how high profile if the England captain was that very one. This could be a line in the sand moment for the game. The common gripe these days is that the players have too much power, imagine if this ruling became common place 'player power' wise.
Click to expand...
Hopefully City tell him ‘if’ he goes down the Webster ruling route then we won’t be signing him.
I don’t want Kane but I’d say exactly the same about any player, Haaland or whoever.
It would/will ruin football.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.