That’s not what he said. Our transfer strategy has led to silverware so we should have faith. They are not using us as a cash cow or as a trophy girlfriend. They’re actively pursuing a policy to win trophies. They have already earned my trust. For whatever that’s worth.What a daft post without us the fans there is no city !
I can only assume they have some form of deep rooted insecurityThis past few months has been as bad a period as i can remember for dickheads signing up to the board.
Yep.This past few months has been as bad a period as i can remember for dickheads signing up to the board.
Unknown and then you have to factor in, how important the FB roles are in Peps system, you're prob looking at 2023 before he gets game time in the first team if hes pulled into training asap.You dont think he will be recovered in 12 months time?
Maybe,just highlighting there is another option rather than spending another 50m.Unknown and then you have to factor in, how important the FB roles are in Peps system, you're prob looking at 2023 before he gets game time in the first team if hes pulled into training asap.
Is it really our transfer policy? Or perhaps one pep...He's won the league with clear squad deficiencies that should tell us something.That’s not what he said. Our transfer strategy has led to silverware so we should have faith. They are not using us as a cash cow or as a trophy girlfriend. They’re actively pursuing a policy to win trophies. They have already earned my trust. For whatever that’s worth.
As others have said, without getting abuse I might add.... I meant poor as in getting grealish when we need to replace aguero, hoping we don't get any long term injuries in that position, what happens then?signing jamie pollock, now thats what you call a poor window!
I havent seen those reports (that they knew of the situation in January)...lets say they did however for sake of argument...Im not sure they could still have done anything....they couldnt suspend him then and there until it was official and if they had gone in and replaced him in the Jan window and lets say loaned him it could have been seen (probably unlikely however but possible) that we were passing judgement on him and not supporting the player....I havent even looked at the case/reports etc so I cant and wouldnt anyway pass any sort of judgement on the accusations BUT the club I believe were probably correct in doing nothing...any sort of action either way could and would have been misconstrued by peoplethe situation with mendy wasn't.. that unforeseen, if we were to believe reports about the club's knowledge of the situation from january.
I think there would have been talks already way earlier than even the start of the summer window....Alfie i reckon would have spoken to Txixi, Khaldoon etc to just get the lay of the land so to speak....or we may have put feelers out....I'm also not convinced that we can have negotiated this deal for Haaland in the, what ... 1 week(?) since we gave up on Kane.
Must admit that I thought this would be the window when we finally addressed that position.
What, long term injuries like Aguero for the last 2 seasons. Ffs we are in exactly the same position now as last season other than strengthening with Grealish to help with the inevitable breaks KDB will haveAs others have said, without getting abuse I might add.... I meant poor as in getting grealish when we need to replace aguero, hoping we don't get any long term injuries in that position, what happens then?
Signing Grealish has/had/will have no impact on signing a striker. It has been made very clear on multiple occasions.As others have said, without getting abuse I might add.... I meant poor as in getting grealish when we need to replace aguero, hoping we don't get any long term injuries in that position, what happens then?
It still baffles me that people don't see Zinchenko as a LB, he's perfect for us and the inverted role, with back up of Cancelo, Ake and even Laporte why would we spend 50m on another LB to clog up an already full squadMaybe,just highlighting there is another option rather than spending another 50m.
It is bollocksOh come on. Don't put this up then don't come back with more.
At least give us some clue who it is who or what country he's from?
I think that @abudhabimaxrespect means that no justification is needed rather than the club can just ignore us.What a daft post without us the fans there is no city !
Grealish does at 1st glance look like an un-needed / luxury signing but looking how we've played for the last couple of games it seems that a lack of a striker is no longer a issue for us. I would actually go as far as saying that dropping a player like Kane into our current system wouldn't result in any more goals (maybe even less).As others have said, without getting abuse I might add.... I meant poor as in getting grealish when we need to replace aguero, hoping we don't get any long term injuries in that position, what happens then?
I agree with that. But don't you think to mix it up would be goodGrealish does at 1st glance look like an un-needed / luxury signing but looking how we've played for the last couple of games it seems that a lack of a striker is no longer a issue for us. I would actually go as far as saying that dropping a player like Kane into our current system wouldn't result in any more goals (maybe even less).
I'm really liking our tactics at the moment - we've gone from getting the ball out wide and crossing it in to a "target" man like Kun or Jesus and we've gone back to the "good old days" (in my mind) of short, neat passes to unlock defences - like we did when Merlin was here in his prime... :)
Our current setup relies on quick short passing, and I'm not sure Kane (or any other of the names being mentioned like Haaland etc) would fit somehow?
Grealish does at 1st glance look like an un-needed / luxury signing but looking how we've played for the last couple of games it seems that a lack of a striker is no longer a issue for us. I would actually go as far as saying that dropping a player like Kane into our current system wouldn't result in any more goals (maybe even less).
I'm really liking our tactics at the moment - we've gone from getting the ball out wide and crossing it in to a "target" man like Kun or Jesus and we've gone back to the "good old days" (in my mind) of short, neat passes to unlock defences - like we did when Merlin was here in his prime... :)
Our current setup relies on quick short passing, and I'm not sure Kane (or any other of the names being mentioned like Haaland etc) would fit somehow?
Can you prove that?It is bollocks