Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2009
- Messages
- 16,617
See KazWho was that mate ?
See KazWho was that mate ?
If anyone is in doubt as to what blatantly corrupt refereeing looks like, here is a reminder...
(Current head of the PiGMOL by the way).
Any decision that Clattenburg gave was suspect. That guy has a VERY shady history.As shocking as that was we have been on the end of refereeing perfomances as bad as that. I remember Raz having a pen awarded against him for the ball clearly hitting his back. Clattenburg.
That particular incident is still etched in my brain, disgusting decision.As shocking as that was we have been on the end of refereeing perfomances as bad as that. I remember Raz having a pen awarded against him for the ball clearly hitting his back. Clattenburg.
Not directly related, but reading this has led me to thinking that we should have considered signing a striker to replace Aguero. Does anyone else feel this?Does anyone else feel we had a number of decisions go against us/ did not get awarded yesterday and is this a sign of what's to come this season? Personally I was amazed that Milner did not see a red, looking in slow motion from another angle Bernardo landed on his head! this could have ended up with him breaking his neck! and also we didn't even get a free kick when Foden was shoved in the box.
Not directly related, but reading this has led me to thinking that we should have considered signing a striker to replace Aguero. Does anyone else feel this?
Maybe it’s worth it’s own threadI've never really thought about it until you just mentioned it. Seems like a sensible idea though.
Here's one.Whilst I was as upset as everyone on here with the officials performance yesterday, I am amazed that anyone can actually call into question the integrity of the officials and their leadership.
Incompetent they may appear, but actually 'bent' they are not. We lose the argument taking this stance and with no actual evidence leave our credibility at a lower level than the people we accuse.
I had 37 years as a referee, covering games from parks to efl level and never at any time have I even heard of a 'supposed' story relating to referees being bent. Ive met some great refs, some good ones and the odd bloody awful ones, but 99.9% of them were reffing cos they loved the game and wanted to put something back into it.
Lets criticise them by all means, but I still believe they just get things wrong, even with VAR. A change at the top is however long overdue.
That, does not, excuse their arrogance.Whilst I was as upset as everyone on here with the officials performance yesterday, I am amazed that anyone can actually call into question the integrity of the officials and their leadership.
Incompetent they may appear, but actually 'bent' they are not. We lose the argument taking this stance and with no actual evidence leave our credibility at a lower level than the people we accuse.
I had 37 years as a referee, covering games from parks to efl level and never at any time have I even heard of a 'supposed' story relating to referees being bent. Ive met some great refs, some good ones and the odd bloody awful ones, but 99.9% of them were reffing cos they loved the game and wanted to put something back into it.
Lets criticise them by all means, but I still believe they just get things wrong, even with VAR. A change at the top is however long overdue.
So how do you explain a former referee admitting he gave the rags a corner rather than the correct decision, a goal kick. No one is saying ALL refs are corrupt, most are saying Pigmol is.Whilst I was as upset as everyone on here with the officials performance yesterday, I am amazed that anyone can actually call into question the integrity of the officials and their leadership.
Incompetent they may appear, but actually 'bent' they are not. We lose the argument taking this stance and with no actual evidence leave our credibility at a lower level than the people we accuse.
I had 37 years as a referee, covering games from parks to efl level and never at any time have I even heard of a 'supposed' story relating to referees being bent. Ive met some great refs, some good ones and the odd bloody awful ones, but 99.9% of them were reffing cos they loved the game and wanted to put something back into it.
Lets criticise them by all means, but I still believe they just get things wrong, even with VAR. A change at the top is however long overdue.
…whilst outside the penalty areaAs shocking as that was we have been on the end of refereeing perfomances as bad as that. I remember Raz having a pen awarded against him for the ball clearly hitting his back. Clattenburg.
Does anyone else feel we had a number of decisions go against us/ did not get awarded yesterday and is this a sign of what's to come this season? Personally I was amazed that Milner did not see a red, looking in slow motion from another angle Bernardo landed on his head! this could have ended up with him breaking his neck! and also we didn't even get a free kick when Foden was shoved in the box.
To be honest it was only really those two Milner decisions and maybe the Cancelo booking that the ref got wrong, he was actually pretty decent outside those three decisions.Does anyone else feel we had a number of decisions go against us/ did not get awarded yesterday and is this a sign of what's to come this season? Personally I was amazed that Milner did not see a red, looking in slow motion from another angle Bernardo landed on his head! this could have ended up with him breaking his neck! and also we didn't even get a free kick when Foden was shoved in the box.
How can anyone who has watched football for any amount of time think its not bent....6 minutes in, commentary 'Mike Riley, who has given United 7 penalties in the last 7 matches he's refereed on this ground makes it 8 out of 8' - unbelievable.
If Cancelo had made the challenges milner did, they’d of had a pen and we’d have been a man down. There’d be no thought about keeping it 11 v 11It's frustrating because Milner really deserved 3 yellow cards for 3 independently bad challenges. Each of those 3 tackles warranted a yellow by itself, not as a matter of accumulated small fouls. He should have been off and then some.
There's a lot of goalpost moving in the arguments about the refereeing v. Liverpool, where Fern and "tactical fouling" come up, but it's really not the same thing. Tierney wanted to finish a cracking match for the neutrals with 22 men on the pitch, even though by the rules Milner deserved to be off and then some.
It defeats the point of having a system with yellow cards if refs are overwhelmingly interested in finishing with full rosters for the sake of the spectacle such that they won't finish a "gift-wrapped" sending off late on in the second half. If Tierney won't send Milner there, he would never send off anyone. What's the point?