Harry Kane

[domalino]

Pep wanted him badly. It feels similar to when we transferred mahrez. We waited and went back to Leicester with a lower more realistic fee.

Kane is obviously not the popular choice with Dusan & Erling seemingly about to come on the market.

A rejuvenated and motivated Kane would be an excellent addition. No mystic but a solid performer.

Vlahovic- gamble.
Kane - safe.
Haaland - unrealistic.

Kane is the obvious city transfer.

"Unrealistic".

According to who?

A chance to buy a player with a release clause is the most City transfer possible.

The only reason people think it's unrealistic is they've swallowed too much media BS about how much Haaland wants to earn.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Pep wanted him badly. It feels similar to when we transferred mahrez. We waited and went back to Leicester with a lower more realistic fee.

Kane is obviously not the popular choice with Dusan & Erling seemingly about to come on the market.

A rejuvenated and motivated Kane would be an excellent addition. No mystic but a solid performer.

Vlahovic- gamble.
Kane - safe.
Haaland - unrealistic.

Kane is the obvious city transfer.

Where is the proof that Pep wanted him?

I know Pep backs himself as a great manager, but I think even he draws the line at being able to get any value out of Kane.

 

[Coatigan]

Pep wanted him badly. It feels similar to when we transferred mahrez. We waited and went back to Leicester with a lower more realistic fee.

Kane is obviously not the popular choice with Dusan & Erling seemingly about to come on the market.

A rejuvenated and motivated Kane would be an excellent addition. No mystic but a solid performer.

Vlahovic- gamble.
Kane - safe.
Haaland - unrealistic.

Kane is the obvious city transfer.

2 goals in 6 months, is anything but safe.

Particularly for a player with no pace approaching his 30s, that is pretty much twice the price of either of the other two.

 

[vicblueman]

Nooooooooooooooooooooooo!

 

[wolviedinho]

Where is the proof that Pep wanted him?

I know Pep backs himself as a great manager, but I think even he draws the line at being able to get any value out of Kane.

Openly courted kane in the media.

 

[wolviedinho]

"Unrealistic".

According to who?

A chance to buy a player with a release clause is the most City transfer possible.

The only reason people think it's unrealistic is they've swallowed too much media BS about how much Haaland wants to earn.

According to City. We don’t go into bidding wars. We box the player off before another club comes knocking. Last summer the club went all in for Kane. The links to both Haaland & Dusan are not concrete. The latter was not even on our radar. Haaland has had plenty of time to decide his next move. He has not once spoken about moving to city. Kane has when he did the interview with sky sports.

 

[I'm Blue]

Not been on this thread in a while, now that’s quite a shift in the voting.
Good!
It’s about time the yes men woke up ; )

 

[wolviedinho]

2 goals in 6 months, is anything but safe.

Particularly for a player with no pace approaching his 30s, that is pretty much twice the price of either of the other two.

I don’t agree. 5 months ago he was a top player but now he is shit? It don’t work like that in the real world. Kane in January would be a fantastic move and help us wrap up the league and give us a shot at the champions league.

Form is temporary.

 

[domalino]

According to City. We don’t go into bidding wars. We box the player off before another club comes knocking. Last summer the club went all in for Kane. The links to both Haaland & Dusan are not concrete. The latter was not even on our radar. Haaland has had plenty of time to decide his next move. He has not once spoken about moving to city. Kane has when he did the interview with sky sports.

sorry but everything in that post is nonsense.

 

[wolviedinho]

sorry but everything in that post is nonsense.

No need to be sorry. The truth is often hard to accept. I would rather have Haaland myself but cannot ignore the moves we have previously made for Kane.

 

[Blueknows]

No need to be sorry. The truth is often hard to accept. I would rather have Haaland myself but cannot ignore the moves we have previously made for Kane.

What moves ? We didn't even put in a bid as levy wouldn't deal with us

 

[Chi-town blues]

What moves ?

 

[bondsman]

Pep wanted him badly. It feels similar to when we transferred mahrez. We waited and went back to Leicester with a lower more realistic fee.

Kane is obviously not the popular choice with Dusan & Erling seemingly about to come on the market.

A rejuvenated and motivated Kane would be an excellent addition. No mystic but a solid performer.

Vlahovic- gamble.
Kane - safe.
Haaland - unrealistic.

Kane is the obvious city transfer.

I watched him last night and he’s anything but safe imho looks a shadow of the player he was.

 

[wolviedinho]

What moves ? We didn't even put in a bid as levy wouldn't deal with us

You must have taken the summer off? ;)

Pep wanted Kane. He made it clear and obvious. The club tried but came up against a master negotiator or a joker depending on your view. If you believe we did not speak to levy then that is an admirable stand point.

 

[wolviedinho]

I watched him last night and he’s anything but safe imho looks a shadow of the player he was.

Do you not agree that his head is messed up with a failed move? It looks from the outside that it has had a big impact. The Kane pre summer was a fantastic forward.

Emotions can cloud any sensible debate surrounding him. Haaland has muddled the waters. My personal choice would be Erling but I would not be upset to see kane rock up.

 

[Sheikh rattle and roll]

I think Kane should still be in the mix.He has clearly thrown his toys out and downed tools however it depends on other factors obviously
Can we afford the other options do they want to come ?
For me ....
Haaland
Vlahovic
Kane
Totally depending on desire and price
However I trust the club let’s face it the last ten years have been far from shabby
The likes of Haaland now need to start leaking their intentions in my opinion
Either privately to the intended club or publicly

 

[wolviedinho]

I think Kane should still be in the mix.He has clearly thrown his toys out and downed tools however it depends on other factors obviously
Can we afford the other options do they want to come ?
For me ....
Haaland
Vlahovic
Kane
Totally depending on desire and price
However I trust the club let’s face it the last ten years have been far from shabby
The likes of Haaland now need to start leaking their intentions in my opinion
Either privately to the intended club or publicly

Exactly, either way city will get a fantastic forward.

 

[domalino]

No need to be sorry. The truth is often hard to accept. I would rather have Haaland myself but cannot ignore the moves we have previously made for Kane.

“The truth”

Lol

 

[Blu1]

Thought he looked much sharper v West Ham than I’ve seen in a while

 

[DontLookBackInAnger]

Do you not agree that his head is messed up with a failed move? It looks from the outside that it has had a big impact. The Kane pre summer was a fantastic forward.

Emotions can cloud any sensible debate surrounding him. Haaland has muddled the waters. My personal choice would be Erling but I would not be upset to see kane rock up.

I honestly think that ship has very much sailed, personally I would be shocked if we get Haaland the club just isn't built any more to get into binding wars with other clubs.

In terms of Kane, I would rate him coming even below Haaland and I would have Haaland in single figures percentage wise.