kun
Well-Known Member
Garcia is average but Torres isn't
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ferran Torres signs for Barcelona
- Thread starter MCFC1993
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
HolisticJim
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 4,696
Torres moved! Not thag long since we lost Garcia to them either.Reports from a pro Barca media. None of them serious, and none of them moved
kun
Well-Known Member
Not at 21, no. He still has a lot of potential to improve.He’s decent, but certainly no world beater.
Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
Fuck him, cheerio.
how have they signed him outside the transfer window?
how have they signed him outside the transfer window?
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,316
Garcia was out of contractTorres moved! Not thag long since we lost Garcia to them either.
kun
Well-Known Member
You can sign players whenever you like. You can only register them during windows.Fuck him, cheerio.
how have they signed him outside the transfer window?
The fact that Ferran is injured and will be until the window opens means there is no reason not to get it done as early as possible.
kun
Well-Known Member
He was only out of contract because he ran it down so he could join Barca, though.Garcia was out of contract
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,316
They just can't register him until the window opensFuck him, cheerio.
how have they signed him outside the transfer window?
Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
They just can't register him until the window opens
ahh i see
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,316
I'm not sure what your point is? We're discussing our club officials doing Barca favours. We can't stop a player running down his contractHe was only out of contract because he ran it down so he could join Barca, though.
kun
Well-Known Member
2 Spanish wingers, so they must be exactly the same... bizarre.Well done City on getting the fee.
Sorry but a younger version of Navas for me.
Navas = 8 goals in 4 years
Torres = 16 goals in 18 months
Navas for Spain = 5 goals in 46
Torres of Spain = 12 goals in 22
Some of you lot are acting just like the scousers when they sold us Sterling. As soon as a player wants to leave/ leaves, a load of you turn against them and begin the revisionism to pretend they were never any good in the first place.
Agueroooo9320
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 1,850
- Team supported
- ctid
not really. Navas never was played in the middle so you cannot compare goals. I would say Navas was far better than Torres for us. at least navas contributed so much to our play and influence in a match. I can't think of one game where torres was influential in a game where I can say he was one of the reasons we won the game.2 Spanish wingers, so they must be exactly the same... bizarre.
Navas = 8 goals in 4 years
Torres = 16 goals in 18 months
Navas for Spain = 5 goals in 46
Torres of Spain = 12 goals in 22
Some of you lot are acting just like the scousers when they sold us Sterling. As soon as a player wants to leave/ leaves, a load of you turn against them and begin the revisionism to pretend they were never any good in the first place.
come-on-barney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 12,184
You are generalising. I was gutted when we lost Sane and still think the lad is class. I just don’t think Torres is anything to write home about. All about opinions, everyone is entitled to one, doesn’t mean people on here are acting like scousers. Cheap accusation.2 Spanish wingers, so they must be exactly the same... bizarre.
Navas = 8 goals in 4 years
Torres = 16 goals in 18 months
Navas for Spain = 5 goals in 46
Torres of Spain = 12 goals in 22
Some of you lot are acting just like the scousers when they sold us Sterling. As soon as a player wants to leave/ leaves, a load of you turn against them and begin the revisionism to pretend they were never any good in the first place.
kun
Well-Known Member
Fucking ludicrous. If you ever saw Navas play you would know he couldn't score with in a brothel. One of the worst finishers the club has possibly ever had.not really. Navas never was played in the middle so you cannot compare goals. I would say Navas was far better than Torres for us. at least navas contributed so much to our play and influence in a match. I can't think of one game where torres was influential in a game where I can say he was one of the reasons we won the game.
Torres scored a hat-trick against Newcastle but clearly had no effect on the game...
Tbf me neither. We will be fine without him. Sané was even better and we had no issue after moving him on.He does and maybe he will, but not one I will lose any sleep over leaving.
2 Spanish wingers, so they must be exactly the same... bizarre.
Navas = 8 goals in 4 years
Torres = 16 goals in 18 months
Navas for Spain = 5 goals in 46
Torres of Spain = 12 goals in 22
Some of you lot are acting just like the scousers when they sold us Sterling. As soon as a player wants to leave/ leaves, a load of you turn against them and begin the revisionism to pretend they were never any good in the first place.
Please understand that I haven’t turned against him…
I just don’t rate him
- Status
- Not open for further replies.