Everton (a) post-match thread

We've lost a point because of a professional who cannot do his job right. It is so incompetent to get it wrong," said Lampard... Presumably if it had been awarded then we would have not been allowed to have Ederson to face it.... Fooking knobhead!
 
If the rags or dippers benefitted from this decision the discussion would be buried by now. City are not allowed to get a Jammy decision. When we do, it's cheating. When the darlings do then it's "you gott hava a little bit of luck innit"
 
Brightwell Bros. said:
I can see why they were frustrated, but this is the saddest thing I've ever seen. And frankly the worst thing they could do for their season, getting dragged into little scraps about apologies when they should be telling themselves if they play like they played on Saturday for half the games this season they'll have more than enough to stay up.
Click to expand...
I’d usually agree but at least someone is publicly trying push how useless VAR is. Cock ups every weekend, a few tuta in the press the day after, and back to the back the following week. Hopefully this might kickstart a review of the whole thing. I’d like it scrapped but I’m not naive enough to think that will happen, but there are many improvements that could be possible should there be a will
 
Nice of the Merseyside police to send us in the opposite direction from the away coaches luckily just found them in time had to chase it down the road though as little scrotes were trying to brick and bottle other coaches.
 
Some slime ball from Sly just questioned Pep about the Everton complaint and if a decision ”like that” can influence a whole season.
what a fucking cock, will they be asking Bingo if Kieta should get a retro red card for stamping on the Chelsea players nads? Cunts the lot of them
 
Anyone remember Stones tackling Sterling at the end of a 0-0 a few years back. Worst decision I have ever seen not to give a penalty.

Their manager

“What you want as a manager is a referee who is 100 per cent when he gives that decision,” Martinez said.

“The way I saw it, I see John Stones going to ground trying to block the trajectory of the ball. All of a sudden Raheem Sterling is quite happy not to play the ball and he wants to invite some sort of contact.

“It is impossible from that point to say if it is intent or if it is a penalty or not. I don’t think the referee could have done it any better. If you are not certain, you don’t want to gamble in a decision that could have been so damaging from our point of view. I felt Roger made the right call there.”
Click to expand...
 
Lovebitesandeveryfing said:
Very difficult to judge unless you're absolutely level. Could be a shade offside (a shoulder, a head) according to current rules.
Click to expand...
Cor blimey.....that is tight! I have no clue one way or the other from that picture. However....it was deemed no penalty and that's that. As my dad used to say ...."Son, the ref didn't give it so the game carries on. It doesn't matter what you or they think".
 
Lovebitesandeveryfing said:
Very difficult to judge unless you're absolutely level. Could be a shade offside (a shoulder, a head) according to current rules.
Click to expand...
It's not that difficult if you know how to judge the angle perspective. Bearing in mind, Laporte is closer to the camera. In that capture, you can faintly see the cut of the grass(couldn't on mine, I used the penalty box as a reference point) which makes it even more obvious that he's definitely offside there.

I don't see why some blues are helping them peddle this narrative that City should have dropped points on that decision.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top