Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
Paul1970 said:
Wouldn’t say Harry Kane was a panic signing mate . I’d still not conplain if we signed Harry Kane for the right fee even now . Kane is top draw and icc do haaland scores half the goals Kane does then we will all be happy .if we wanted aguero to stay another year as alluded to by the poster I replied to, All with the vision of keeping aguero until our first target Haaland became available for £67m this year, then I’d suggest Kane was a bit of a panic attempt for a striker to cover aguero’s decision to leave, as aguero rejected the one year option and that threw our plan off. If we’d of signed Kane for the £130mill reported offer and consequently missed out on haaland this time around because we wouldn’t of bought both, I’d see Kane as a panic purchase.
Click to expand...
Paul1970 said:
Wouldn’t say Harry Kane was a panic signing mate . I’d still not conplain if we signed Harry Kane for the right fee even now . Kane is top draw and icc do haaland scores half the goals Kane does then we will all be happy .
Click to expand...
He would of been. If it meant we missed out on haaland. We wanted aguero to stay another year, According to the poster I replied to, to allow for a haaland bid a at the end of that year, Aguero rejected that extra year and we were a top class striker short. We went to plan b and tested the water with Spurs and Kane. I think Kane would be seen as a panic buy now. Especially at the figures being reported. Had it gone through and Haaland wouldn’t even be an option now. I think we dodged one with Kane.
 
citizen_maine said:
Did Uby mention a written clause?
Click to expand...
No, but Kane wanted to sign only the club wouldn't let him as there was no formal agreement to sell, spurs held all the power. Haaland has a formal written agreement with his club so they have absolutely no power to stop him. Huge difference

Although I would be surprised if this doesn't trundle on for a while yet
 
The only person who knows where Erling Haaland will play next season, is Erling Haaland. Free will is a beautiful thing, and until the ink is dry on any physical contract he's not ours. Everyone claiming he's definitely coming here is talking, to put it kindly, out of their arse.

Admittedly my giddiness quotient is quite high, because clearly the right moves are being made, but I'll refrain from watching the YouTube vids just yet. Superstition and all that.
 
Surely he can’t sign any agreement until the clause is paid. I can’t see how the clause could kick in before the season ends, if it did and was paid surely the buying team would insist he doesn’t play for Dortmund again. That wouldn’t make any sense.
 
theres only one carlito said:
He would of been. If it meant we missed out on haaland. We wanted aguero to stay another year, According to the poster I replied to, to allow for a haaland bid a at the end of that year, Aguero rejected that extra year and we were a top class striker short. We went to plan b and tested the water with Spurs and Kane. I think Kane would be seen as a panic buy now. Especially at the figures being reported. Had it gone through and Haaland wouldn’t even be an option now. I think we dodged one with Kane.
Click to expand...
Signing the best striker in the Premier League and one of the best in the world at 28 would have been far from a panic buy. I agree Haaland would be the first choice of the 2 but we aren’t suddenly bidding for Martial or Danny Ings because a past it legend in Serge was leaving.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top