Our monarch and parliament can check one another with power.Two positives can’t make a negative.
Yeah! Right!
It’s why we’re the only major European nation to never have a dictator.
Our monarch and parliament can check one another with power.Two positives can’t make a negative.
Yeah! Right!
It’s spawned a nation ofangry bitter folkgobshites.
I think you are spot on. I am by no means a royalist but she was a giant in English history, the first and only royal to go from the black and white photographs, radio, through to TV and the Internet. All done with very few mistakes or indiscretions, that takes a huge amount of skill in statecraft. The proof of that pudding is how much the rest of her family struggled with the scrutiny and discipline required for the role. She will be an impossible act to follow.I was four when George V1 died and his daughter became queen so she is effectively the only monarch I have known. This is very little on which to base a broad statement of royalism or monarchism. All I can say is that I have been fortunate to have lived for seventy years under the best example of a monarch. It has been very easy to be a royalist under this queen. I fear it will be nowhere near as easy in the years to come.
Beat me to it.Sweet.
The new anthem?
I think Charles II was pretty lucky!If he is King Charles - Charles is not a lucky name for UK monarchs - I recall reading some years ago that he would use Phillip as his monicker - however so long has passed its hard to see how that would work given how we have all known him as Charles all our ( and his ) lives
Shit hits fan....
You’ve honestly lost me here.I suspect many in Ukraine (and russia) would argue otherwise.
That's the problem with "electing" a head of state, they can do what they want and changethings so they can do what they want.
Shit hits fan....
I think you’ll find I was calling into question the election of Putin as president as as poor example of any sort of democracy.Our monarch and parliament can check one another with power.
It’s why we’re the only major European nation to never have a dictator.
I'll let you do some research on putin then, an elected president, basically he now can't be unelected.You’ve honestly lost me here.
That's because very few of us, well none actually, had a chance to show itI really fear for the country, now she’s gone.
We are utterly divided as a nation. To most of us, she was the glue that was still holding us together.
Sadly, very few of us share her sense of duty.
i‘ve always been an optimist and generally a very positive person, and I think we’re fucked as a nation.
While I'm not advocating Cromwell, he did at least see to it that Manchester had Parliamentary representation. Once the monarchy was restored we had to wait almost 200 years before we had an MP again!As monarchs go from eras gone, Charles II wasn’t a bad one. He restored a lot of tradition after that **** Cromwell was done in.
Obviously he’s hoping his reign is nothing like Charles I (small “ha”).
But the name Charles doesn’t come with the baggage “John” does, who nobody would ever be named after again, in a Royal sense.
I’m just an FOC!Third monarch, that's pretty impressive in itself!