Bluewars
Well-Known Member
Because Arse and United are shite too!Title fight for top 4 I assume you mean? You've watched us play, why the fuck would we win the league?
Because Arse and United are shite too!Title fight for top 4 I assume you mean? You've watched us play, why the fuck would we win the league?
On balance rags deserved it. We were woeful, bar 20 odd minutes before we scored we could barely string two passes togetherThought we weren’t the better team, for me Rashford is offside he interferes with play. We must get back to higher tempo play, too many changes is affecting momentum.
But then you don’t go onto lose the game.
Mate, get some money on the lottery quick!We are second in the league because other teams were more shit than us. United is catching up and given our record against spurs by midweek United would have surpassed us on table
Miles offside, ball played to him, flag goes upLinesman gave offside.
And my goodness what help they got!at 1-0 my family were buzzing . i said hang on , they haven't had their help yet.
Who'd have thought a dodgy decision in favour of United would shift the momentum in the game. It does feel like defeat snatched from the jaws of victory, but again we are insipid in attacking phases and I never felt comfortable with a one goal lead. Something needs to change - 442 anyone?
Didn’t Pep once say he didn’t believe in possession for possession sake ?1 shot on target again today tells you all you need to know, no point controling possession if you don't do anything with it. Its a recurring theme that needs changed quickly.
My favourite player, but has changed so much over the past 4 months.
Arse aren't. The other red shit fucking are which is why today is now drinking to oblivion day.Because Arse and United are shite too!
He should see me..That's about as fed up as I've seen him.
So get your team to take more fucking risks!!!
and he dummied it before he left it for ratboyOh, I'm in total agreement the rule is a joke and needs changing, especially with the way it judges defenders touching the ball. But the law says:
He was in the way of Akanji tracking back, he made Walker change the trajectory of his run to cut him off, he made Ederson come out of his goal square. What more does he have to do to be interpreted as interfering in play? Does he have to knock a few defenders out and spit in Ederson's face before he starts 'impacting the ability of an opponent to play the ball'?
- making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
last one he did, hovers over the ball, changes body motion which directly impacts the defenders and keeper, making them follow him and react to his actionsThat's the actual law. He did none of those.
I'm not a Haaland fan in fact i think he's set us back with his 0 touches every damn gameAre you a City fan or just a Haaland fan? When Haaland moves to his next team, will you be going with him?