Arse aren't. The other red shit fucking are which is why today is now drinking to oblivion day.Because Arse and United are shite too!
Arse aren't. The other red shit fucking are which is why today is now drinking to oblivion day.Because Arse and United are shite too!
He should see me..That's about as fed up as I've seen him.
So get your team to take more fucking risks!!!
and he dummied it before he left it for ratboyOh, I'm in total agreement the rule is a joke and needs changing, especially with the way it judges defenders touching the ball. But the law says:
He was in the way of Akanji tracking back, he made Walker change the trajectory of his run to cut him off, he made Ederson come out of his goal square. What more does he have to do to be interpreted as interfering in play? Does he have to knock a few defenders out and spit in Ederson's face before he starts 'impacting the ability of an opponent to play the ball'?
- making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball
last one he did, hovers over the ball, changes body motion which directly impacts the defenders and keeper, making them follow him and react to his actionsThat's the actual law. He did none of those.
I'm not a Haaland fan in fact i think he's set us back with his 0 touches every damn gameAre you a City fan or just a Haaland fan? When Haaland moves to his next team, will you be going with him?