United Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Jim Ratbag has thrown his wig into the ring for the scum…..at least now we know why the PL cheated them a win at the weekend……must inflate the brand value prior to a purchase.

If there was ever a more astute man who could spot a failing business and turn it into a cash cow it’s Jim…..although the Glaziers seem to have done a good job.
 
For United’s moral police that have been so vocal about club ownership they may want to think about climate change being linked to 5 million deaths a year and Ineos’ own position as one of the world’s largest producer of harmful emissions and plastics
Plastics you say.....
 
more likely they draw and we beat Spurs then Arsenal batter them and normal service is resumed. It's been a shite weekend but by Sunday things will be back to normal and the green and gold will be out for the 15,634th time. They are fickle scum, let them enjoy their cup final win, we have real fucking trophies to compete for and in the cabinet. They have cheated their way to the Trafford Cup
We won’t beat spursy Spurs.
 
For United’s moral police that have been so vocal about club ownership they may want to think about climate change being linked to 5 million deaths a year and Ineos’ own position as one of the world’s largest producer of harmful emissions and plastics
How appropriate for someone linked to a takeover of swampland.
 
198db91fe9fd44908e0fe87259690200.jpg
Always liked Jim McDonald on Corrie, so I did
 
Remember laughing my head off about 3 games into the season when Martin Samuel wrote that it was now unlikely that united would ever be above City in the league this season. Come 10pm on Wednesday night that will more than likely no longer be correct. Oh for those halcyon days of Alice crying into her computer in her hospital ward. Bizz

I miss Alice :(
 
Complete nonsense. You appear to be making it up as you go along. You are ignoring the cases that have already been decided which I referenced for you.
Point 1. Non disclosure is alleged in the writ. I suspect you are misremembering something. Even if there was widespread publicity, the non disclosure concerns payment.
Point3.
As well as being an exchange FTX was a proprietory coin.
Point 4:
Not pari passu. Opposite direction of movement of consideration.
I spent too many years wrestling with marketing regs re investments than I care to remember, so I think I probably know more than you do.
Point 5. Even if this were the case, a signature could not overcome the regs.
I await your mea culpa when the case is heard!

You were doing OK until your last sentence.
 
Some red **** who rang in TS this morning in response to britains richest man possibly buying them out

“Well really we could so with some one like saudi buying us, i know theres human rights issues but ….”

Fuck off. Like every other football fan , owners from the middle east buying a club and its human rights record is only an issue when its someone elses team, the second they flutter their eye lashes at your club its less of a moral issue

Wankers
 
Not really sure what would be in it for Ratcliffe? He'd be buying at the top end of the market, and will need to invest heavily in the infrastructure of the club. Evidently he's not that big a United fan if he's held a Chelsea season ticket. Not sure he's going to be the sort of sugar daddy benefactor that many United fans want either. He's obviously an astute businessman, but the Glazers (and FSG) mustn't think there's much more cash to be squeezed out of the clubs now that the Super League is dead in the water. It'll be interesting to see if he's serious about bidding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top