In 90% of cases Zinchenko was a perfect LB for us. HOWEVER, the 10% of matches where he was found out, always came in crucial high end matches where his lack of pace & the fact he's not actually a defender were cruelly exposed.So true. I think almost everybody rated Zinchenko highly, but for some reason Pep just didn't favor him.
agreed on all you said. zinc, jesus and sterling were below what we need for the first team. we have higher standard than the likes of arsenal and chelsea. this season unfortunately we did not meet those standards yet.In 90% of cases Zinchenko was a perfect LB for us. HOWEVER, the 10% of matches where he was found out, always came in crucial high end matches where his lack of pace & the fact he's not actually a defender were cruelly exposed.
Think the CL semi vs Real where they switched attack in the final 15 minutes & targeted Zin after he replaced Walker & Cancelo moved from LB to RB is a case in point. This was Zin's glass ceiling.
At the very highest level it's small incremental details & a touch of luck which make the difference. However I believe we make our own luck in life, but there's little we could've done about Zin's lack of pace, or his inability to deal with rapid skillful Wingers.
I think Pep realised that Zin, Sterling & Jesus had hit the limits of what they could achieve at City, so to achieve the aim of winning the only title to elude Guardiola, we needed more.
I say this in full knowledge that Guardiola fucked up against Chelsea in the Champions League final, & that defeat was all on him.
Zinchenko, Sterling or Gundog should've never started that game & should've been replaced by Cancelo & Rodri. The only anomaly was who started as striker/false 9? We could have started Gundog & used KDB as a false 9 & used Rodri as our CDM.
We could have used Torres, Jesus or Sterling up front, with Foden LW & a midfield of KDB, Bernardo & Rodri, in fact anything but the lineup we started with!
There were several permutations we could have used, & with the squad available, Zinchenko was never a starter, hence we got rid in the expectation Cucurella would replace him.
agreed on all you said. zinc, jesus and sterling were below what we need for the first team. we have higher standard than the likes of arsenal and chelsea. this season unfortunately we did not meet those standards yet.
Valentin Barco.Any good full backs in Argentina?
Valentin Barco.
I was always a bit relieved to see Zinchenko come on during big games, and I remember thinking he played well during the CL semi vs Real. Then again, I'm on a keyboard, Pep is at the Etihad, and Zinchenko's with the arse, so I'd say you're view is probably more accurate.In 90% of cases Zinchenko was a perfect LB for us. HOWEVER, the 10% of matches where he was found out, always came in crucial high end matches where his lack of pace & the fact he's not actually a defender were cruelly exposed.
Think the CL semi vs Real where they switched attack in the final 15 minutes & targeted Zin after he replaced Walker & Cancelo moved from LB to RB is a case in point. This was Zin's glass ceiling.
At the very highest level it's small incremental details & a touch of luck which make the difference. However I believe we make our own luck in life, but there's little we could've done about Zin's lack of pace, or his inability to deal with rapid skillful Wingers.
I think Pep realised that Zin, Sterling & Jesus had hit the limits of what they could achieve at City, so to achieve the aim of winning the only title to elude Guardiola, we needed more.
I say this in full knowledge that Guardiola fucked up against Chelsea in the Champions League final, & that defeat was all on him.
Zinchenko, Sterling or Gundog should've never started that game & should've been replaced by Cancelo & Rodri. The only anomaly was who started as striker/false 9? We could have started Gundog & used KDB as a false 9 & used Rodri as our CDM.
We could have used Torres, Jesus or Sterling up front, with Foden LW & a midfield of KDB, Bernardo & Rodri, in fact anything but the lineup we started with!
There were several permutations we could have used, & with the squad available, Zinchenko was never a starter, hence we got rid in the expectation Cucurella would replace him.
So we got rid of zinchenko and bought gomez ! Fuck me I bet Real Madrid would have shit the bed knowing that gomez was on .In 90% of cases Zinchenko was a perfect LB for us. HOWEVER, the 10% of matches where he was found out, always came in crucial high end matches where his lack of pace & the fact he's not actually a defender were cruelly exposed.
Think the CL semi vs Real where they switched attack in the final 15 minutes & targeted Zin after he replaced Walker & Cancelo moved from LB to RB is a case in point. This was Zin's glass ceiling.
At the very highest level it's small incremental details & a touch of luck which make the difference. However I believe we make our own luck in life, but there's little we could've done about Zin's lack of pace, or his inability to deal with rapid skillful Wingers.
I think Pep realised that Zin, Sterling & Jesus had hit the limits of what they could achieve at City, so to achieve the aim of winning the only title to elude Guardiola, we needed more.
I say this in full knowledge that Guardiola fucked up against Chelsea in the Champions League final, & that defeat was all on him.
Zinchenko, Sterling or Gundog should've never started that game & should've been replaced by Cancelo & Rodri. The only anomaly was who started as striker/false 9? We could have started Gundog & used KDB as a false 9 & used Rodri as our CDM.
We could have used Torres, Jesus or Sterling up front, with Foden LW & a midfield of KDB, Bernardo & Rodri, in fact anything but the lineup we started with!
There were several permutations we could have used, & with the squad available, Zinchenko was never a starter, hence we got rid in the expectation Cucurella would replace him.
There's two distinct issues here.agreed on all you said. zinc, jesus and sterling were below what we need for the first team. we have higher standard than the likes of arsenal and chelsea. this season unfortunately we did not meet those standards yet.

That's the issue. With the expectations on a team like City, we're geared up to have a squad who can do the 90% & step up to compete at a world class level in the other 10% of games.I was always a bit relieved to see Zinchenko come on during big games, and I remember thinking he played well during the CL semi vs Real. Then again, I'm on a keyboard, Pep is at the Etihad, and Zinchenko's with the arse, so I'd say you're view is probably more accurate.
Still, if I only get Zinchenko for 90 percent of the games, I'm keeping him.
Not quite. There were two issues. We wanted a new No 1 LB (Cucurella) which meant both he & Cancelo would probably be No 1 & 2 for LB. We've got players who're better CM's & LW's than Zin, so I think it was best for City & Zin to part company.So we got rid of zinchenko and bought gomez ! Fuck me I bet Real Madrid would have shit the bed knowing that gomez was on .
We desperately need a top LB, it's the highest priority signing for me.This season will hopefully confirm to Txiki & Pep that LB is a priority position which needs to be filled. What I also don't want to see is another CB who can play LB.
I want a top class, left footed LB, preferable two. OR if we feel Gomez has sufficient potential, perhaps he could remain as a LB apprentice understudy & learn his trade knowing the pressure to perform at the very highest level is off as he learns his trade.
People are still piling up on Gomez. That guy is young is trying his trade in new country and cost just €10m
Shame that he isn't being given benefit of doubt for first season. Guess he isn't as lucky as some other players
Personally I don't think JWE will make it at City, albeit I'd love him to. Agreed, a world class left footed left back should be our priority, & Gomez should be given another season to settle in & prove his worth.We desperately need a top LB, it's the highest priority signing for me.
I wonder with all the incomings at chelsea if we could get Chilwell in the summer?
I know he's been injured a lot but when he's on form he looks like he'd be perfect for us. If not him, i would try for Robinson at Fulham.
I don't think we need two LB's quite yet. We need to give Gomez time, he's young, new to the league and country and has shown potential. I think he'd be better playing further forward though and like Zinchenko be used at LB if needed.
We also have Wilson-Esbrand to consider also.