VAR thread 2022/23

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing ever changes. The Var lovers won't come on today, they always wait at least one day. Then it's 'didn't see it I was at the shops but.....' 26 pages later when everyone has lost the will to live and we are bored into submission, the thread fies until the next match.The fan comments on the bbc match report is worth reading, scouse match obviously, hundreds of posts calling out what it is, blatant cheating.
Where is Bluehammer?
 
It didn’t do that in either code of rugby though.

VAR is being used incorrectly, referees aren’t reffing properly because of VAR. it’s a viscous cycle of wrongly implementing it from both sides.
Do you attend rugby matches?
I do. Newcastle falcons, nearly every match. Officiating is getting worse and reviews longer and more often called upon. Articles has also shown umpiring in cricket has become less secure.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, there was VAR for the Liverpool v Wolves game at Anfield but they just decided not to use it..

Not once but twice..!

Karma that the cheating twats got knocked out today..!

but PiGMOL will console themselves with the fact that they kept the dippers in longer than they deserved .
 
Nothing ever changes. The Var lovers won't come on today, they always wait at least one day. Then it's 'didn't see it I was at the shops but.....' 26 pages later when everyone has lost the will to live and we are bored into submission, the thread fies until the next match.The fan comments on the bbc match report is worth reading, scouse match obviously, hundreds of posts calling out what it is, blatant cheating.
Contrast the comments with the match report which does not mention the 2 potential game changing red card incidents. The BBC complicit in the cheating.

Edit. A small mention of the Fabinho tackle only at the end of the report.
 
Contrast the comments with the match report which does not mention the 2 potential game changing red card incidents. The BBC complicit in the cheating.

BBC Sport totally complicit with their unreserved bias towards their meal tickets, ie rags and dippers , with integrity and honestly totally absent from their remit.
 
Contrast the comments with the match report which does not mention the 2 potential game changing red card incidents. The BBC complicit in the cheating.

Edit. A small mention of the Fabinho tackle only at the end of the report.
The media being complicit is why after match interviews is not the Panacea some claim.
The media will choose which incidents to interrogate. Gives the media even more power in shaping the narrative and protecting the product.
 
Last edited:
They get slaughtered when they make decisions too quickly ( not looked at it properly) and now for taking too long. It took longer than normal because there were two separate potential offsides in the same move to consider.
If the communicated with the crowd/viewing audience it wouldn't be a problem.
 
I bet todays fabinho 'decision' was pgmol ensuring everyone gets a nice little end of year performance contract bonus. I suspect that call today will go down as correct by the referee after checking with the VAR team who agreed.

Stats for correct decisions by the ref goes up, pgmol can prove their refs deserve their bonuses because they get more calls correct.... Football suffers.

I would love to see how they are measured in their performance.
 
I've said for a while that the only way to get everybody onside (no pun intended) with VAR is to broadcast what the officials and the VAR team are saying verbatim... Then there is nothing hidden, we know what they say and we know (or hear at least) the justification for decisions... Then we can argue the toss when things are as blatant as us v the rags and today in the Brighton game
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top