The biggest thing that winds me up in all of this is, that we're essentially being accused for having too much money and having an owner that actually cares about the club.
The notion of that is ridiculous.
We would be the first club punished for actually having owners that want to invest.
That's why these charges are dangerous and why Pep was alluding to 'be careful what you wish for' yesterday.
Didn't have all these journalists and opposition fans defending us when our previous owner nearly put us out of business though. They don't actually care about those issues, that's why Bury went under so easily, FFP did jack shit to protect them.
But bent over a few times for Old Traffords money , we must be a big significant club if they want our players.Fuckin nailed it.
Slimy c**t who overprices his own players for sale then moans at transfers fees.
"Outside"?
Nailed itThe biggest thing that winds me up in all of this is, that we're essentially being accused for having too much money and having an owner that actually cares about the club.
The notion of that is ridiculous.
We would be the first club punished for actually having owners that want to invest.
That's why these charges are dangerous and why Pep was alluding to 'be careful what you wish for' yesterday.
Didn't have all these journalists and opposition fans defending us when our previous owner nearly put us out of business though. They don't actually care about those issues, that's why Bury went under so easily, FFP did jack shit to protect them.
So if we get found guilty, but have irrefutable evidence of our innocence, as we have stated, then wouldn’t you say that was an unfair process? Therefore, High Court here we come no?This cannot be right. There is no way we can appeal the decision to the high court. We can only appeal to HC in the event of unfairness or fault in the procedure.
I doubt the panel will find us guilty, though I don’t think this panel will be as neutral as CAS.
No. That is an appeal of the verdict. To get to court we would have to allege faulty process.So if we get found guilty, but have irrefutable evidence of our innocence, as we have stated, then wouldn’t you say that was an unfair process? Therefore, High Court here we come no?
Pmsl
No. That is an appeal of the verdict. To get to court we would have to allege faulty process.
If they’ve ignored evidence, wouldn’t that be a faulty process? Or is it more on the side of the have to follow due process as written in the Pl handbook?No. That is an appeal of the verdict. To get to court we would have to allege faulty process.
she’s a disgrace. formally of the Anfield Wrap she should be no where near reporting on any story relating to us.
“If the Premier League telephone, I just ignore it”Especially when it’s Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon who answer the phone!
Sicilian ?P—c5.
And the crowd go wild, what a great move.
Not sure if anyone knows who to raise to at the club/has someone they can raise It to here is the bit wheres she's being libellous about CAS with the childish air quotes
And meI'm trying to establish what side of the fence you are on here,with some of the posts you have made this week on this thread.
Thing is you've probably blocked me anyway,so may not to choose to reply,which is generally your trait,unless trying to put somebody down,but I am deeply concerned for someone with as many forthright views that you portray,as to where the land does actually lie with you.
Asking for 40 friends
She bought them off kloppAren’t adults supposed to have 32 teeth in total, not per row?
we can go for another hearing but we would have to meet their rules to have one,unlikely so yes your correctSo if the panel finds us guilty, we cannot appeal the verdict? Or am I thinking this wrong?