Not followed what the subject is about but, just in relation to above, I think any serious bet in lower league would set the bookie bells ringing very quickly - for instance there is currently £1.4m matched on betfair for our game today and, randomly picking the first match listed in L2, only £7k matched on Bristol v Burton...
It’s a fans forum mate. People are just after a bit of escapism and fun. I think we’ve had enough seriousness and boring shit over the last few weeks.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell if people want reality, delusion or fantasy. Rightly or wrongly, I assume a thread specifically on these charges more inclined to reality.
Even if it was true, there’s no connection between City’s various charges and the actions of an individual at PigMol
A bit of all of the above mate ;)
Why would they have to go into detail ? They can just simply say all charges are dropped with speaking to the club , both parties seem confident(us more so if we believe what the club has said) that they will win the case , someone is going to back down here , and I don’t see it being us. Unless there is a smoking gun element for the PL side , but I’m sure that if this is just about hacked emails , then City will have the real back up evidence that it’s a load of shit. It’s the geopolitical side of things that interests me , we get charged , the delayed white paper is coming out- and the elephant in the room about the ESL- which in my opinion is going to supercede the current CL format, something just isn’t right when you put those “coincidences” together. Anyway , Arsenal are flapping like a tap dancers fanny now in the race for the PL title- let’s cheer the boys to the three in a row!
Agreed. Let's try to stick to the issue at hand, not on field issues.
You’ve missed the point of my post, of course he was offside, of course he was interfering with play and it should have been ruled outTouching the ball is irrelevant. Attwell was supposed to apply the criteria for an opponent interfering with play as stated in the laws. As you can see Rashford was clearly interfering with play because he breached at least three of the guidelines listed; namely preventing an opponent from playing the ball; obstructing an opponent's line of vision; making an obvious action which impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball. Rashford ran towards the ball, shielded it, and obstructed Akanji and Ederson's vision.
The decision by Attwell wasn't a mistake. It was a suspicious decision. Remember the linesman called it correctly but was overruled by Attwell. He didn't even check the video. The rules are clear.
Hope Mr Keegan came up with an inventive username!
Good effort, but it was actually Jack Gaughan and his username is pretty lame tbh.
Duck ?
