Alexandole Boris de Pfeffel Johnson

bluethrunthru said:
The point with it is you won't read it because you know how it ends and its not the ending you wanted so you will ramble on about cake and curries rather than actually understand what the committee was set up to do - at who's request - who voted to approve its make up and what would have happened with these conclusions coz the shit house cut and run
Click to expand...
Well aware of the Committe’s make up, procedures, and so on. Yet to read the report.
 
Brewster's millions said:
I could be flippant and say that you are in denial about the curry night.

Clearly broke the rules and people who were there said no work was done at the event, so why were they there having beer and curry? And why did Rayner pretend that she didn’t know whether she was there or not? I know she has a permanently vacant look about her, but it’s a bit silly claiming that you didn’t know where you were on a given date.
Click to expand...

2 Police investigations - 3200 Police man hours and £100k cost ....... and I am the one thats flippant - hilarious
 
bluethrunthru said:
2 Police investigations - 3200 Police man hours and £100k cost ....... and I am the one thats flippant - hilarious
Click to expand...
Once again, you’ve got the wrong end of the stick regarded who was being flippant (I was referring to myself).

Also, I couldn’t give two shits what the police report said, as they clearly broke the rules.
 
west didsblue said:
You appear to be one of just two people who say they are not aware of the contents of the report, with Sunak being the other.
Click to expand...
I actually haven’t had the time to read it yet. I’m reading it now in fact.

I don’t know what you do with your day - not a lot by the looks of it - but some people are busier than others.
 
Brewster's millions said:
I actually haven’t had the time to read it yet. I’m reading it now in fact.

I don’t know what you do with your day - not a lot by the looks of it - but some people are busier than others.
Click to expand...
You do know it is possible to be aware of the key points by listening to the news, and it has been the headline item on pretty much every bulletin today.
 
Brewster's millions said:
I haven’t had time to read the report yet, but I will do.

Clearly the bloke has an issue telling the truth, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he did mislead, but I do think that enough has already been said about the issue to be honest.

The apparent drinking culture at No. 10 was wholly wrong, but I think the country has bigger things to worry about than whether somebody turned up at a work meeting with a birthday cake, or whether tables were put out on the lawn at the back of Downing St. And if the rules were broken at No.10, then they were also broken by Starmer and Rayner when they had their curry night in Durham.

Also, the idea that Harriet fucking Harmen should be lecturing people about standards of behaviour - even Boris Johnson - is ridiculous. This is someone who has been censured by the Electoral Commission on numerous occasions, who had to repay substantial sums as a result of the expenses scandal, and who tried to remove MP’s expenses from the scope of FOI requests. Poacher turned gamekeeper as far as she is concerned.
Click to expand...

I've not finished it but am a decent way through having skimmed once already. I think when you read it you'll find it's conclusion(s) are pretty robust. As Greives the former AG had been saying today it's important to not get sucked back into the partygate aspect of it but the more constitutional point in question of whether our PM stood at the despatch box and lied to the house and by extension the nation. I would suggest it's hard to draw any other conclusion. As for Harman I'm not necessarily her biggest fan but it's important to recognise the committee is majority conservative anyway. Standards in public life and particularly in politics have been declining for a number of years; if we are to try and arrest the decline then I think dealing with the most visible and egregious offender is a good start. I would like to think it is a start of a broader renewal but that might be wishful thinking on my part.
 
threespires said:
I've not finished it but am a decent way through having skimmed once already. I think when you read it you'll find it's conclusion(s) are pretty robust. As Greives the former AG had been saying today it's important to not get sucked back into the partygate aspect of it but the more constitutional point in question of whether our PM stood at the despatch box and lied to the house and by extension the nation. I would suggest it's hard to draw any other conclusion. As for Harman I'm not necessarily her biggest fan but it's important to recognise the committee is majority conservative anyway. Standards in public life and particularly in politics have been declining for a number of years; if we are to try and arrest the decline then I think dealing with the most visible and egregious offender is a good start. I would like to think it is a start of a broader renewal but that might be wishful thinking on my part.
Click to expand...
Yeah, will be interesting to read it tonight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top