PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The only thing that worries me is the fact both the Glazers and FSG have taken their history clubs of the market - I think they wanted to sell because they couldn’t compete with us and perhaps they have been made aware that we will be sanctioned
The only reason they're not sold is because nobody is stupid enough to pay the extortinate asking price the deluded greedies are asking for
 
The only reason they're not sold is because nobody is stupid enough to pay the extortinate asking price the deluded greedies are asking for

& how many people quote a ridiculous price for a job they don’t want.

They can’t afford to sell for the asking price.
 
I know that there's no evidence to get us sanctioned and as mentioned many times this will take years not months.fsg and glaziers have taken the clubs of the market because it makes zero sense to sell when the stocks are low.

They are off the market because there are no buyers at the prices being quoted.
 
Maybe there are no bids because whilst doing the checks the bidders have found untold irregularities in the books and thought fuck this. Then the glazers put out they what 6billion knowing no fucker will buy them so it looks like they have pulled the plug.
 
How can city or the PL prove or disprove anything when it relates to a club that is nothing to do with city in a different jurisdiction which doesn’t have to do anything for city or the PL and. Manager who again is in a different jurisdiction who doesn’t have to do anything for city or the PL it should be dismissed within about 30 seconds unless of course City want to 100% clear there name and can persuade these people who give evidence and testimony
I'm possibly misremembering or misunderstanding but wasnt there some documents in Der Spiegel with someone at City sending the money to the Abu Dhabi club?
 
I'm possibly misremembering or misunderstanding but wasnt there some documents in Der Spiegel with someone at City sending the money to the Abu Dhabi club?

Something like that. Can't remember the details, though. Will look later. Probably something to do with Italian "tax planning". Difficult to know without knowing how it was accounted for, which is the problem with a few emails presented without context. And, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how the payments to Mancini were funded. All that matters is valid contracts that were properly performed.
 
Something like that. Can't remember the details, though. Will look later. Probably something to do with Italian "tax planning". Difficult to know without knowing how it was accounted for, which is the problem with a few emails presented without context. And, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how the payments to Mancini were funded. All that matters is valid contracts that were properly performed.

The purpose of the contract was probably to ensure that RM didn't take a job elsewhere in the meantime.

That however is irrelevant. If the agreed services were rendered by RM and paid for by Al Jazeerah, that's an end of it.
 
The purpose of the contract was probably to ensure that RM didn't take a job elsewhere in the meantime.

That however is irrelevant. If the agreed services were rendered by RM and paid for by Al Jazeerah, that's an end of it.

Link to the 50+ page PDF here:


The first 2 payments were paid from a MCFC account "MCFC Stadium Oper..." to "Roberto Mancini Sparklegrow" via an Italian bank. See pDF pages 19 and 22.
 
What's the problem if its listed in our accounts, it's not like we paid him with a suitcase full of readies.
 
Doesn’t look good on first impressions! Money being sent from city to ADUG to cover his consultancy contract whilst we declare that his mangers salary for a £xxxx to the premier league
 
Link to the 50+ page PDF here:


The first 2 payments were paid from a MCFC account "MCFC Stadium Oper..." to "Roberto Mancini Sparklegrow" via an Italian bank. See pDF pages 19 and 22.
My eyes are fucked, but are there different font types in the same documents?

Are these docs from Der Spiegel or have they been released from another more trusted source?

Not sure I’d believe anything from Der Spiegel after the last lot of doctored emails
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top