bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
After seeing him giving evidence to the Commons select committee I am convinced he is a moron.Masters isn't stupid, the third choice man is doing precisely what he's told to do.
After seeing him giving evidence to the Commons select committee I am convinced he is a moron.Masters isn't stupid, the third choice man is doing precisely what he's told to do.
So perfectly qualified to run the PL.After seeing him giving evidence to the Commons select committee I am convinced he is a moron.
After seeing him giving evidence to the Commons select committee I am convinced he is a moron.
The only reason they're not sold is because nobody is stupid enough to pay the extortinate asking price the deluded greedies are asking forThe only thing that worries me is the fact both the Glazers and FSG have taken their history clubs of the market - I think they wanted to sell because they couldn’t compete with us and perhaps they have been made aware that we will be sanctioned
The only reason they're not sold is because nobody is stupid enough to pay the extortinate asking price the deluded greedies are asking for
I know that there's no evidence to get us sanctioned and as mentioned many times this will take years not months.fsg and glaziers have taken the clubs of the market because it makes zero sense to sell when the stocks are low.
Sounds over qualified to me.So perfectly qualified to run the PL.
I'm possibly misremembering or misunderstanding but wasnt there some documents in Der Spiegel with someone at City sending the money to the Abu Dhabi club?How can city or the PL prove or disprove anything when it relates to a club that is nothing to do with city in a different jurisdiction which doesn’t have to do anything for city or the PL and. Manager who again is in a different jurisdiction who doesn’t have to do anything for city or the PL it should be dismissed within about 30 seconds unless of course City want to 100% clear there name and can persuade these people who give evidence and testimony
I'm possibly misremembering or misunderstanding but wasnt there some documents in Der Spiegel with someone at City sending the money to the Abu Dhabi club?
Something like that. Can't remember the details, though. Will look later. Probably something to do with Italian "tax planning". Difficult to know without knowing how it was accounted for, which is the problem with a few emails presented without context. And, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how the payments to Mancini were funded. All that matters is valid contracts that were properly performed.
The purpose of the contract was probably to ensure that RM didn't take a job elsewhere in the meantime.
That however is irrelevant. If the agreed services were rendered by RM and paid for by Al Jazeerah, that's an end of it.
Link to the 50+ page PDF here:
The first 2 payments were paid from a MCFC account "MCFC Stadium Oper..." to "Roberto Mancini Sparklegrow" via an Italian bank. See pDF pages 19 and 22.
My eyes are fucked, but are there different font types in the same documents?Link to the 50+ page PDF here:
The first 2 payments were paid from a MCFC account "MCFC Stadium Oper..." to "Roberto Mancini Sparklegrow" via an Italian bank. See pDF pages 19 and 22.
Excellent :)