Suella Braverman - sacked as Home Secretary (p394)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Chippy_boy said:
If the best someone can manage is hounding on someone for typing 77 instead of 67, it really doesn't say a lot for the strength of their argument.. Not that I expect better from some of the individuals on this forum to be honest.
Click to expand...
It’s your inability/unwillingness to suggest you were wrong about people “flouting” Covid rules that has seen you get ridiculed more.

The number error is largely inconsequential. Your usual doubling down and trying to defend yourself by attacking others is getting you where you are now.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
It’s your inability/unwillingness to suggest you were wrong about people “flouting” Covid rules that has seen you get ridiculed more.

The number error is largely inconsequential. Your usual doubling down and trying to defend yourself by attacking others is getting you where you are now.
Click to expand...
I am not trying to defend myself or attacking anyone. I am stating my opinion and getting abuse because people don't like it. Here again, in my opinion MOST people broke the rules to some degree. That's what I think. YMMV. End of.

Anyway, I REALLY must go now. I am spending to much time on this tripe.
 
Chippy_boy said:
If the best someone can manage is hounding on someone for typing 77 instead of 67, it really doesn't say a lot for the strength of their argument.. Not that I expect better from some of the individuals on this forum to be honest.
Click to expand...
It wasn’t just a simple typo though was it?
It’s boring, but let’s look again at your exact words:
“There's 77m people in this country I think and I only suggested 70m of them are hypocrites.”
Now stop back peddling faster than Eddie Merckx on his way down Ventoux and simply admit that you didn’t / don’t know the population of the UK and therefore, your claim of 70 million being hypocritical is bollocks. Ta ta
 
johnnytapia said:
It wasn’t just a simple typo though was it?
It’s boring, but let’s look again at your exact words:
“There's 77m people in this country I think and I only suggested 70m of them are hypocrites.”
Now stop back peddling faster than Eddie Merckx on his way down Ventoux and simply admit that you didn’t / don’t know the population of the UK and therefore, your claim of 70 million being hypocritical is bollocks. Ta ta
Click to expand...
Oh FFS. Read the bloody search I just posted above and then maybe reflect on whether perhaps an apology might be appropriate.

forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk

Search results for query: 67m

forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk
 
johnnytapia said:
No,,I don’t think you were trying to con anyone. I just think you didn’t know the population of the UK, hence your (nonsensical) claim that 70million flouted the rules.
Click to expand...
He’s fairly sure he didn’t say flouted and he said everyone knows the population of the UK, and everyone who has a different opinion to him is a woke leftie.

Seems he’s having a bit of a mare today. Good job for his sake that he’s too busy to continue making himself look a twat.
 
west didsblue said:
He’s fairly sure he didn’t say flouted and he said everyone knows the population of the UK, and everyone who has a different opinion to him is a woke leftie.

Seems he’s having a bit of a mare today. Good job for his sake that he’s too busy to continue making himself look a twat.
Click to expand...
And I'm accused of attacking people? For Fucks Sake.
 
Ducado said:
There are some political commentators saying that this whole situation is just another battle in the ongoing Tory civil war, I think civil war is a bit simplistic, Braverman is going for the UKIP vote, and since UKIP took over the party it’s not a bad shout, Sunak is Cummings man, basically he’s just a stuffed shirt doing as he’s told, and then there is the BJ faction who are stirring up trouble on the sidelines

They are imploding and it’s a sight to behold
Click to expand...

She wants to be leader of the tories (that will leave them unelectable but that’s a different topic) so she must be an MP after next GE…but is appealing to the further right of the party the right way for her to retain her seat to become so?

Your post got me wondering if UKIP had performed in her seat last time out so she was trying to appeal to them - which would then make some political sense for trying to woo those voters over, however distasteful - but they didn’t.

It’s really hard to see what her game is. Unless it’s a scorched earth policy.
 
johnnytapia said:
I never knew United spunked 67 million in 2014. Plus ça change and all that.
Click to expand...
GIven you have clearly seen my multiple previous posts where i say the UK population is 67m, I will take it what you actually mean is , "Sorry Chippy, I now accept that you knew the population of the UK was 67m. I apologize for banging on about something so ridiculous".

Thanks
 
Chippy_boy said:
GIven you have clearly seen my multiple previous posts where i say the UK population is 67m, I will take it what you actually mean is , "Sorry Chippy, I now accept that you knew the population of the UK was 67m. I apologize for banging on about something so ridiculous".

Thanks
Click to expand...
“There's 77m people in this country I think”
I now accept that you didn’t know the population of the UK was 67m. I apologise for banging on about something you keep claiming you knew but, in fact, you didn’t.
 
I believe it’s just a matter of when she goes and not if, this is a very calculated move on her part, because there no way she did not know the consequences of what she did

There is a chance she will try and unseat him, however I believe she is setting herself up for the next election, she would destroy what remains of the Tory party, so let’s cheer her on
 
johnnytapia said:
“There's 77m people in this country I think”
I now accept that you didn’t know the population of the UK was 67m. I apologise for banging on about something you keep claiming you knew but, in fact, you didn’t.
Click to expand...
If i did not, then why did I say the UK population is 67m MANY times - 6 or 7 times I think - in the previous links I showed you going back to 2020???

I'd appreciate a straight answer to that, in the unlikely event that you are not just wumming.

And THEN perhaps you will be big enough to apologise? Go on, let's see if you have the cajones for it.
 
Chippy_boy said:
If i did not, then why did I say the UK population is 67m MANY times - 6 or 7 times I think - in the previous links I showed you going back to 2020???

I'd appreciate a straight answer to that, in the unlikely event that you are not just wumming.

And THEN perhaps you will be big enough to apologise? Go on, let's see if you have the cajones for it.
Click to expand...

I'd like to take this opportunity to formally turn down your offer of a 79.
 
Chippy_boy said:
If i did not, then why did I say the UK population is 67m MANY times - 6 or 7 times I think - in the previous links I showed you going back to 2020???

I'd appreciate a straight answer to that, in the unlikely event that you are not just wumming.

And THEN perhaps you will be big enough to apologise? Go on, let's see if you have the cajones for it.
Click to expand...

“There's 77m people in this country I think and I only suggested 70m of them are hypocrites.”

Why say 70m are hypocrites if you “know” (not think) there are only 67m in total?

Or was the 70m also a “typo”?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top