Suella Braverman - sacked as Home Secretary (p394)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Of course it does the more diverse we become, to more it become the normal and the less we question, my children question diversity whether in sexuality or race or religion far less than my parents or my grandparents did,as we know there is no going back, and there isn’t,
So as diversity increases it reduces prejudices over the generations.
Some signs go against a lot of things you are saying. But if you are happy with that, crack on.
 
Some signs go against a lot of things you are saying. But if you are happy with that, crack on.
Doesn’t matter what I say and even less than what you say. Diversity has,is,and will always increase. Peoples have moved around since the first people first walked from Africa. Nothing you or Braverman and her followers think or say will change that.
 
Doesn’t matter what I say and even less than what you say. Diversity has,is,and will always increase. Peoples have moved around since the first people first walked from Africa. Nothing you or Braverman and her followers think or say will change that.
Correct. And not even voting gets you what you want.

No-one can answer my question tho. Because it simply is not desirable because someone will always be put out be it via religion, political, racism, poverty, unfairness, sexism, crime etc. It's an ever evolving experiment.
 
She doesn’t have the support or popularity within the parliamentary party but has been elevated to almost sainthood by the grassroots, so she’s effectively powerless I think the strategy is to ignore and marginalise her as the right wing loon
 
Last few pages have been a bit of a fever dream to be honest. I’m a racist, Aphex is a racist and there was something about dogs and Groove Armada.

Think that covers it.
Ha ha. Glad you summarised nicely.

Looking at an earlier post which said ‘….then banging on about 'non whit identifying' benefit recipients as if they must be ……’ I did wonder if that was the only “e” that had been dropped tonigh?
 
I've got a question for anyone on here.

Explain why diversity is so desirable. And if it is, then will ever changing diversity improve on the diversity we have, or will it be detrimental to the diversity that existed in that moment?
It's not desirable for its own sake, it's just a fact of life. The real question is why is it so desirable to attempt to restrict diversity, because left to our own devices, diversity is inevitable. I mean a good chunk of diversity is sexuality, gender and disability. Would you ask why those things are desirable? They're not desirable, they just exist.
 
Wish i had the magic wand.
Brexit should be reversed as even those who voted for it must see we are worse off.Not too sure that the EU would have us back.

The Nhs needs proper funding if taxes have to go up so be it.Get rid of the middle managers and put the money where it needs to go.

Immigration i am afraid needs to be tougher.

Work dodgers need to work for thier money put something back.

Strong leader have we got one? Maybe a Mourdant,or Hunt.
Reeves from the Labour party.
Watch the abuse i get for that suggestion.
So no real answers then.

Whilst I hate Brexit, "sorting it" won't involve rejoining in my lifetime. WE had a good deal with all of the associated opt outs. The country voted to take the leap off the cliff without checking the safety blanket was in place.

The NHS sucks cash out of the taxpayer at an alarming rate. I am a huge fan but just getting rid of a few iddle managers won't resolve the structural issues that exist.

Immigration tougher-how? And do you mean legal or illegal?

Work-connected to the above in a way. We are one of the few countries that doesn't allow migrants to work until their case is heard. There is no doubt that some take the piss out of the system but again without a wholesale reform I'm not sure how you adddress the loopholes. Work has to be made worthwhile both financially but also to get a grip of dodgy employers who also take the piss.

Mordaunt?-look at her conference speech, it's almost deranged.

Reeves-maybe in the future, but they have to get in first.
 
Is that still said or is it one of those apocryphal phrases that’s seeped in from too many TV dramas?
@gordondaviesmoustache ???
It’s what attorneys say in American courts. Things can be objected to over here (along less prescriptive grounds) but if anyone said that word on its own over here they’re be laughed at, and depending on the judge, have their legs taken from under them.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top