Media Discussion - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d love to work at Sly Sport News and Sly Sports just to see what goes on, to find out why they are so far up the Rags arses, and to find out who at Sly Sports News is controlling and pushing all of this Rag propaganda.

Its the rags and liverpool. Unfortunately the most watched (apparently).

However if u look on skys youtube channel any city highlights are the most watched each week, regularly over 1m views.

We're also the most watched in America from the latest yearly viewing figures.

So no idea how they're calculating it.

I think old cunts sticking to their worldview formed in the late nineties and early 00's has something to do with it too.
 
Shows the intelligence of these pundits not both of them having Rodri or Haaland in theirs teams as a nailed on certainly. Also not having Pep (5 trophies in 2023) as manager of the year.

Dumbasses of the highest order

I think it was team of the first half of the season, not 2023, wasn’t it?
 
Its the rags and liverpool. Unfortunately the most watched (apparently).

However if u look on skys youtube channel any city highlights are the most watched each week, regularly over 1m views.

We're also the most watched in America from the latest yearly viewing figures.

So no idea how they're calculating it.

I think old cunts sticking to their worldview formed in the late nineties and early 00's has something to do with it too.
I posted this recently:

5 of the 6 most viewed PL games in the last 4 seasons involved City.

The Premier League provide the clubs with viewing figure for the total worldwide. We are 3rd behind United and Liverpool. (There wil be less bias for the international market)

In the UK alone, live audiences for City games in 22/23 increased by 14% against a PL average of 6%. (Newcastle had the biggest growth of 44% in the UK)

When PL/domestic games are combined with European games, we had our best ever viewing figures last season AND WERE THE MOST WATCHED TEAM IN EUROPE and, by default, the WORLD.
 
I wonder if they are going to discuss the second penalty.
Already swept under the carpet.
BBC after our win v Everton, headline had controversial penalty in it despite it being the right decision.
2 of the biggest dives ever, both ref and var gave them, blatant corruption in plain site, not a word in their match report or headline
 
Its the rags and liverpool. Unfortunately the most watched (apparently).

However if u look on skys youtube channel any city highlights are the most watched each week, regularly over 1m views.

We're also the most watched in America from the latest yearly viewing figures.

So no idea how they're calculating it.

I think old cunts sticking to their worldview formed in the late nineties and early 00's has something to do with it too.
It's the same reason the United thread is so popular on here. Its inexplicable really.
 
What that tells me is that there is not a single journalist who is interested in the merits of the charges against us.

Perhaps some journalists do not understand the issues involved in the charges. Perhaps others are not interested in whether we are actually guilty or not. Perhaps both. We all knew that there were some journalists whose output was driven solely by clicks. These are the hacks who would not write a story that was unlikely to drive clicks but had journalistic merit.

I didn’t realise that was all of them. Every single one of them.
And the thing is, they have the UEFA/CAS case for collateral. How stupid or (more likely) committed to ignoring the obvious do they have to be not to see the connection between the two cases and the impact on the likely outcome of this latest one?

But then many of them, either through complete ignorance, misinterpretation or deliberate misinformation, never understood the CAS verdict properly.
 
Not even a tweet, even Martin Samuel has missed the fact it’s all started on doctored emails.

I could write the article myself if any of the cockroaches reading this site wanted to use that. Obviously with my level of education it will be grammatically poor, as if they’d written it themselves.
I don’t think we should focus too much on the doctored emails. CAS acknowledged it had happened but didn’t place any significance on it or think it disproved any of the charges against us. It’s kind of the equivalent of our detractors saying we got off because it was all time barred. A grain of truth but nothing like the whole story
 
BBC’s biggest football moments of 2023 includes.
  • Bales retirement
  • Mary Earps jersey row
Not a mention of.
  • City winning the CL for the first time
  • The 5 trophies that nobody before has achieved
That organisation is an utter disgrace.
How is it in the interest of a public broadcaster to cover the cryarsing over a sweat shop made over priced goalkeeper kit? At the very best it was a misjudged merchandising decision. Growing up there were many instances of certain GK kits not being on sale. It has nothing to do with an attack on women's football.
 
How is it in the interest of a public broadcaster to cover the cryarsing over a sweat shop made over priced goalkeeper kit? At the very best it was a misjudged merchandising decision. Growing up there were many instances of certain GK kits not being on sale. It has nothing to do with an attack on women's football.

IMG_2108.jpeg

You could never get this goalkeeper shirt anywhere. I don’t remember any campaign for justice for Paul Cooper or Andy Dibble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top