Elbow beards
Well-Known Member
And still nothing about loading massive debts on clubs... Ooh wonder why?
Two thingsTo establish market value they would need to speak to the prospective sponsor and see their figures and plans for justification (you know - like sensitive and in some cases critical business details ) of offering the agreed contact amounts. They have absolutely no right to demand that business critical detail that may be of use to a rival.
Let's just say, for example, you were an American bank, with no branches or current account offerings in the UK, why would you sponsor a English football team? Or maybe you're an American car manufacturer and don't have any dealerships in the UK? What is the market advantage of sponsoring an PL team and when do the figures justify the investment?
An investor may say, ' I want to grow my brand internationally and have looked at business plans and engagement of local communities around the world but crucially, success would drive that idea.
Anyway, they are all valid reasons, whether we like them or not, and it's up to them.
p.s . Obviously, if the American bank in the example, were to have committed various money laundering activities and dealt with terrorists, they would need to sportwash their reputation and only they would know the value of sponsorship against their profits from said activities.
And who were fined 1.9 billion for money laundering Colombian drug cartel moneyTwo things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
I stand correctedTwo things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
Maybe I wasn't clear, apologies, but the point was whether we like it or not, it is up to the individual companies and PL's global appeal is a valid reason. for some companies.Two things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
I can't see how that won't be the caseIs this going to be like FFP, where it's designed to hit City but actually only screws over the smaller PL clubs that were convinced to vote for it?
Two things
PL is a global entity the players shirts are see world wide
Standard Chartered is a UK bank who operate globally
It's CFG who have the stake and I believe it's a joint venture with OVG, so close to 50%, with Harry Styles as a minority partner. So CFG will take any financial benefit, not City. The income from the hotel and other developments will be fully City's though.I missed it too but was informed, I think by @Prestwich_Blue, that we bought a 25% stake in the arena. I have not seen it anywhere but we are listed as a stakeholder in the legal docs apparently.
I love references to a 'level playing field'.
When, in the history of top-flight football has there been a 'level playing field'? Answer, never. The teams who whine most would be horrified if there was such a thing. It would mean all revenues pooled and split 20 ways. More chance of me being elected President for Life of the Commonwealth of Great Britain.
What they mean is: 'We want Rags, LFC, Arsenal and Chelsea to be in the Top 4 every year. Chelsea can slip out occasionally to be replaced by Spurs or whoever. That's what we mean by 'level playing field'.'
It's related party transactions that companies have to declare, and there has to be a well-defined connection. Etihad is not a related party to City under the relevant accounting standard but the PL are trying to make it one.This Associated Party Transaction isnt it normal in big business
You work with people/companies you trust and build networks.
It's related party transactions that companies have to declare, and there has to a well-defined connection. Etihad is not a related party to City under the relevant accounting standard but the PL are trying to make it one.
As this was rejected in November there must have been some lobbying going on so it’s not an independent vote. What would have changed in less than 3 months?
There must have been some desperation for this to be passed, I sincerely hope there’s evidence of meddling from the likes of the Hateful 8 and Masters, the latter is a puppet, his strings are being pulled to some tune, we know his agenda but ffs, what’s in it for him?
Masters is an absolute weapon, we need an independent CEO not this lily livered fucker.
This shit all the time….VAR….blue cards next….fuck football, honestly, the game has turned to shit.