PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Just watched the uplifting Netflix treble documentary. Loved it. But made me think about these charges again. We cannot let the vested interests pressing for these “115“ charges sully that treble or the Sergio moment, or the centurions, or three/four in a row and so on. Have had enough of this hanging over us. Watching the tears of the players last year and reliving the emotion of the trip to Istanbul highlighted how much I just do not want any of that tainted.

Not sure that adds to the thread, gives any solutions at all but I just had to get it off my chest. Sorry!
Not one goal or one blade of grass will be tainted.

The term tainted only comes from the fans of the red mardarses and any other mardarse know nothing tossers out there.
 
Is this a trick question?
No, maybe I'm reading your quote wrong.

A rolling period includes two or more continuous years and all such periods over the time frame selected. As an example, over any given 10 years, there are eight 3-year rolling periods (1986–1988, 1987–1989, 1988–1990, 1989–1991, etc.). The advantage of using rolling periods is bad returns cannot be hidden as easily.
 
I quite like that we were charged after a 4 year investigation, why 4 years?

Surely if they believed they had anyting on us after 2 years they would have just charged us then.

i suspect a lot of smoke and mirrors.
Thing is we haven’t been charged with anything we have been alleged to have done something wrong there’s a difference. Don’t let the fooking media make out we are wrongdoers.
 
No, maybe I'm reading your quote wrong.

A rolling period includes two or more continuous years and all such periods over the time frame selected. As an example, over any given 10 years, there are eight 3-year rolling periods (1986–1988, 1987–1989, 1988–1990, 1989–1991, etc.). The advantage of using rolling periods is bad returns cannot be hidden as easily.
I've said this somewhere earlier in the thread but it shows up the stupidity of the rolling 3-year system.

Let's imagine these bottom line results from a club:
2021 £150m loss
2022 Breakeven
2023 £40m profit

That's an aggregate loss of £110m, therefore failing PSR, even though the trend of the results is positive. There really shouldn't be any issue with that sort of trend.

Now imagine:
2021 £40m profit
2022 Breakeven
2023 £150m loss

It's the same aggregate loss yet it should be ringing very loud alarm bells.
 
The Premier League have referred it to an “Independent Commission”. It’s out of their hands.
Full attention and resources could simply refer to them supplying the IC with that mythical thing called evidence if they had any.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top