Next time brains starts banging on about City’s unlimited legal resources it might be worth asking what he would have us do? Pitch up to court with Ballotelli in a white wig and a Law for Idiots book under his arm?!!!!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
If Talksport wanted the view of a City fan then they’d ask a City fan to go on specifically for that reason.
Stefan is on there because he’s a football finance expert, not because he’s a City fan and it’s unfair of anyone to expect him to compromise his professional standards just because we want a cheerleader in the press.
Get tits out Jackie on.
J
J
jasko’s hairy plum
Guest
I’m only interested to know what are the premies of rules on the letters? What are the boundaries and the consequences?I am not an apologist for Stefan but if you were expecting an independent expert to defend our club on Talk Sport you picked the wrong site, you need to stick to Blue Moon. Regards the charges obviously we are being accused that is why it's so serious and why ultimately we will win because to prove that will be very difficult
J
J
jasko’s hairy plum
Guest
I’d personally prefer Foden’s mom.Get tits out Jackie on.
GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
That's the point you clown. The target audience, the morons that lap up that shit on a regular basis, will have come away from that with their prejudices bolstered and a golden opportunity to put our side of things has gone begging.you're reacting like TokeSpote fkn fodder
Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 11,948
Why Always Mea Culpa?Next time brains starts banging on about City’s unlimited legal resources it might be worth asking what he would have us do? Pitch up to court with Ballotelli in a white wig and a Law for Idiots book under his arm?!!!!
GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
Sorry mate, I must be the only one who gives a fuck about all of this?If you really need to see someone frothing at the mouth in response then why not apply yourself?
GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
Stefan. He thinks at the same pace as Robert Peston.fkn ell - who left the gate open?
I’d love to see the eloquent, fast responding, charismatic, knowledgable @GortonBlue62 doing City proud on Talksport.
Time to f#ck Stefan off ;)
Time to f#ck Stefan off ;)
Kinkybyname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 4,139
- Team supported
- Manchester City
oh do fuck offStefan. He thinks at the same pace as Robert Peston.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
You're the only one having a pop at Stefan for no reason other than he's not wearing his City scarf.Sorry mate, I must be the only one who gives a fuck about all of this?
J
J
jasko’s hairy plum
Guest
Give it a rest mate . Jordan wants Stefan to stoop to his level .Stefan. He thinks at the same pace as Robert Peston.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Did he sleep with your dog or run over your wife? Time to step back from the keyboard bud.Stefan. He thinks at the same pace as Robert Peston.
That's the point you clown. The target audience, the morons that lap up that shit on a regular basis, will have come away from that with their prejudices bolstered and a golden opportunity to put our side of things has gone begging.
You've just described yourself.
Their target audience is you. Get you listening, get you angry, get you talking about it.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,915
I don't normally watch Talksport but I will give it a look when @projectriver 's piece is up.
Will say this, though. It's a little unfair to expect him to defend City in an environment which isn't controllable, but one could expect mistruths to be corrected. No idea yet if that happened. I am sure he did his best to do that, difficult though it is.
Will say this, though. It's a little unfair to expect him to defend City in an environment which isn't controllable, but one could expect mistruths to be corrected. No idea yet if that happened. I am sure he did his best to do that, difficult though it is.
But mate does this really matter, the target audience don’t give a shit in any City view regardless.That's the point you clown. The target audience, the morons that lap up that shit on a regular basis, will have come away from that with their prejudices bolstered and a golden opportunity to put our side of things has gone begging.
Personally it’s all background noise until conclusion of the case.
GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
Irrespective of what Talksport want, he's on there with a golden opportunity to present a positive view of our situation and Simon Jordan, keeps butting in with lies that are easily countered and Stefan is too slow to react and too moderate to fight back.If Talksport wanted the view of a City fan then they’d ask a City fan to go on specifically for that reason.
Stefan is on there because he’s a football finance expert, not because he’s a City fan and it’s unfair of anyone to expect him to compromise his professional standards just because we want a cheerleader in the press.
Exactly. If you want the views of a City fan who has a history of taking their top off at matches then Stefan is not the man (I don’t think).Get tits out Jackie on.
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Give over, and go and lie down in a dark room FFSIrrespective of what Talksport want, he's on there with a golden opportunity to present a positive view of our situation and Simon Jordan, keeps butting in with lies that are easily countered and Stefan is too slow to react and too moderate to fight back.