jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 6,544
me too please
It's just the same guff that was posted on facebook last week.
me too please
go back to before the wolves game and you can read exactly this about pawson and twatwell, you can use stats skewed in diff directions to prove most things, we have to show up and take it out of their handsThe PL have appointed the 2 PL referees with the least favourable stats for our club, in the next 2 away matches: Taylor and Kavanagh,(both about 55% when are normal win % is over 70%). The PL seems to be trying to ensure we don't achieve the historic 4 successive top flight wins. I put the stat. details in the Ref Watch forum.
Emma firstIs everyone on spice this evening?
Even if we could sue them, do we have any hard evidence (other than strong suspicion) that would stand up in court? Would we have any realistic chance of winning the case?Given that the club are members of the Premier League, I'm not sure City would be able to sue the Premier League.
Can't be done in Irish Law as far as I know (eg you can't sue the golf club you are a member of because, as a member, you'd be suing yourself). Might be different in England and Wales of course.
I've had a quick listen back to the City section. Don't think I'd say anything different. Not really sure what Gorton's issue is - most likely stylistic (tough) or a lack of understanding (try to read more on the topic).
Here is the City section (along with grimace):
PM pleaseI’ve had a doc with info but can’t seem to insert in private messaging; any help would be welcome
Have I got this right? There were no letters sent, meaning no percieved "position of strength", meaning we all allowed ourselves to foolishly get hooked on giddiness and ultimately made ourselves look like chumps?
Or have I got that wrong?
pm please mateNot checked so forgive me if posted but has anyone else received info regarding Murray Rosen QC (assigned independent person) with regards to this being thrown out??
Even if we could sue them, do we have any hard evidence (other than strong suspicion) that would stand up in court? Would we have any realistic chance of winning the case?
it’s blindingly obvious what a main plank of the PL’s defence would be. If City had cooperated with the investigation we wouldn’t have been charged. It’s our own fault that we ended up being charged. Whether or not that’s actually true, it seems to me that it would be a strong defence for them.
Welldone.That's a rare comment
Fuckin hell, five and a half thousand pages.. Can one of the nerdier posters do a kind of potted summary please. I've been ill.
For a start, who's a **** and who isn't?
;)
Stefan practised the ancient art of getting somebody to come up with your idea.Today just showed how unintellectual he actually is.
It actually is. Look at the comments after the Arse game reference their penalties last week and then the assumptions of what was going to happen against Wolves.It’s down to the City players no other fucker for fucks sake
You got it right chump.Have I got this right? There were no letters sent, meaning no percieved "position of strength", meaning we all allowed ourselves to foolishly get hooked on giddiness and ultimately made ourselves look like chumps?
Or have I got that wrong?
PM please!!You must have gotten the wrong PM.
Something is up alright -:)
It is brand new information people!