PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Prophet of Doom said:
White and Jordan discussing City and 115 and let an Irish LFC fan listener on to compare City to Lance Armstrong and they all have a good laugh about it.

This is the Talksport that we were informed last week supposedly got a legal letter warning them.
Click to expand...
How informed are they about our finances. Not. White and Jordan are as ill informed about City as any normal headline reading fan. They know nothing about us.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
Just heard that. Surely that's taking them to court stuff.
Click to expand...
Outrageous that was allowed to be broadcast. It was quite obvious what was being teed up for the Irish LFC fan to spew out as the final caller on the topic.

I think it’s obvious that no legal warning letters have been sent to Talksport which everybody was getting giddy about last week.
 
Prophet of Doom said:
Outrageous that was allowed to be broadcast. It was quite obvious what was being teed up for the Irish LFC fan to spew out as the final caller on the topic.

I think it’s obvious that no legal warning letters have been sent to Talksport which everybody was getting giddy about last week.
Click to expand...
Over here the dipper fans are far worse than the rags. They are hurting as bingo is going and City totally pist on their "glory" period rendering it an utter after thought that will soon be forgotten.
 
Prophet of Doom said:
White and Jordan discussing City and 115 and let an Irish LFC fan listener on to compare City to Lance Armstrong and they all have a good laugh about it.

This is the Talksport that we were informed last week supposedly got a legal letter warning them.
Click to expand...
Especially given there is a delay on calls being broadcast to stop legally sensitive stuff being broadcast.
 
halfcenturyup said:
:) I managed to put myself through the first part about City and, really, it was generally bollocks. McGeehan, that asshole from Sheffield Hallam, and some random locals with axes to grind.

Why can no-one get their head around the difference between a private investment from an AD businessman who happens to be a politician and a royal, and a sovereign investment fund? It really isn't difficult. They can ignore it as much as they want, but it just weakens their argument as no-one has ever, in any legal setting, put the case that City is, in fact, owned by the emirate of Abu Dhabi.

And then their point that Mansour invested in City so he could coerce the City Council into making profit out of regenerating the area. Really. I doubt Mansour had been to Manchester, was remotely interested in Manchester or had any interest in investing money in Manchester until after he bought the club. Why would he? What he did have, though, was the business acumen too see the benefit to himself, the council and the region as a whole in investing outside the club. As for gentrification, I didn't see any of these assholes being born and growing up in NE Manchester over the last decades. They can stick their concerns about gentrification up their arses along with their posh accents. Lived in Manchester since the 1990s? I bet it was a leafy suburb, not fucking Ancoats. Tosser.
Click to expand...
I find it all very strange. Wether it is an individual or a state, he/they have invested their own money INTO Manchester. Last Sunday everyone saw what happens when a family REMOVE one billion pounds and counting, from this country. Further they have removed another one billion plus when they sold some of their shares to some scruffy bloke.
That same American family and the scruffy bloke now want UK taxpayers to fund a rebuild. When will Radio 4, the Grundian or any other media whore write/broadcast about that ?
 
LeonardoDaVnci said:
Isn't it funny how programmes like that always fail to mention the hundreds of millions of poumds arsenal have received from that well know UAE airline Emirates. Maybe Emirates don't use Aviation fuel in their aircraft. Perhaps they just use 100% green bio fuel from Rwanda, that would explain it...
Click to expand...
The UAE airline that's the flagship carrier of Dubai and is state owned by Dubai so therefore Arsenal are being funded by a sovereign wealth fund. As for that bastion of freedom and democracy Rwanda...
 
Prophet of Doom said:
White and Jordan discussing City and 115 and let an Irish LFC fan listener on to compare City to Lance Armstrong and they all have a good laugh about it.

This is the Talksport that we were informed last week supposedly got a legal letter warning them.
Click to expand...

If it was in any way a serious comment why would they be laughing about it?
 
LeonardoDaVnci said:
Isn't it funny how programmes like that always fail to mention the hundreds of millions of poumds arsenal have received from that well know UAE airline Emirates. Maybe Emirates don't use Aviation fuel in their aircraft. Perhaps they just use 100% green bio fuel from Rwanda, that would explain it...
Click to expand...
No one cares about Arsenal. That’s why nothing is said, same with Chelsea, Leicester, United, Liverpool and spurs.

The reason city is attacked is because we are the dominant force, the top dogs. All the rest combined have won nothing like the trophy haul we are privileged to witness under Pep.

Everyone, literally everyone in real life and the socials can’t stop talking about City!

I don’t think it has dawned on most fans how big the club has become.
 
Prophet of Doom said:
White and Jordan discussing City and 115 and let an Irish LFC fan listener on to compare City to Lance Armstrong and they all have a good laugh about it.

This is the Talksport that we were informed last week supposedly got a legal letter warning them.
Click to expand...
Thought Jordan confirmed that he or Talkshite had not received any letter
 
wolviedinho said:
No one cares about Arsenal. That’s why nothing is said, same with Chelsea, Leicester, United, Liverpool and spurs.

The reason city is attacked is because we are the dominant force, the top dogs. All the rest combined have won nothing like the trophy haul we are privileged to witness under Pep.

Everyone, literally everyone in real life and the socials can’t stop talking about City!

I don’t think it has dawned on most fans how big the club has become.
Click to expand...
You'd think the takeover had only just happened 2 years ago wouldn't you? its near on 16 years ago since we were bought, there wouldn't be a peep tbh if we had been restricted like Newcastle have been - or if united had gone toe to toe with us since baconface retired.
 
wolviedinho said:
No one cares about Arsenal. That’s why nothing is said, same with Chelsea, Leicester, United, Liverpool and spurs.

The reason city is attacked is because we are the dominant force, the top dogs. All the rest combined have won nothing like the trophy haul we are privileged to witness under Pep.

Everyone, literally everyone in real life and the socials can’t stop talking about City!

I don’t think it has dawned on most fans how big the club has become.
Click to expand...
The irony of this is that many of those having a pop at our dominance under Pep will be the same dickheads who said Pep wouldn't cut it in England, regardless of how much money he spent!
 
M18CTID said:
The irony of this is that many of those having a pop at our dominance under Pep will be the same dickheads who said Pep wouldn't cut it in England, regardless of how much money he spent!
Click to expand...
And the same people who use this current success to attack our dominance will be the same people who belittle us when Pep is gone and we ain’t winning everything.

Basically these people are thick wankers. Unfortunately there is tons of them about and like with anything in life mass idiocracy normally prevails.
 
Arsenal left Highbury for the Emirates-funded new stadium with the precise intention to double their income and become the dominant force in English football.
 
halfcenturyup said:
:) I managed to put myself through the first part about City and, really, it was generally bollocks. McGeehan, that asshole from Sheffield Hallam, and some random locals with axes to grind.

Why can no-one get their head around the difference between a private investment from an AD businessman who happens to be a politician and a royal, and a sovereign investment fund? It really isn't difficult. They can ignore it as much as they want, but it just weakens their argument as no-one has ever, in any legal setting, put the case that City is, in fact, owned by the emirate of Abu Dhabi.

And then their point that Mansour invested in City so he could coerce the City Council into making profit out of regenerating the area. Really. I doubt Mansour had been to Manchester, was remotely interested in Manchester or had any interest in investing money in Manchester until after he bought the club. Why would he? What he did have, though, was the business acumen too see the benefit to himself, the council and the region as a whole in investing outside the club. As for gentrification, I didn't see any of these assholes being born and growing up in NE Manchester over the last decades. They can stick their concerns about gentrification up their arses along with their posh accents. Lived in Manchester since the 1990s? I bet it was a leafy suburb, not fucking Ancoats. Tosser.
Click to expand...
I seem to remember reading that AbuDhabi were interested in the potential for investment in E.Manchester before Mansour decided to buy the club.
 
wolviedinho said:
No one cares about Arsenal. That’s why nothing is said, same with Chelsea, Leicester, United, Liverpool and spurs.

The reason city is attacked is because we are the dominant force, the top dogs. All the rest combined have won nothing like the trophy haul we are privileged to witness under Pep.

Everyone, literally everyone in real life and the socials can’t stop talking about City!

I don’t think it has dawned on most fans how big the club has become.
Click to expand...
But the attacks on City and Sheikh Mansour began almost literally the day news of the takeover broke, long before we became the dominant force. First it was the Robinho transfer and City's money ruining football (thank you GPC), then it was the schools and hospitals Sheikh Mansour could build instead of wasting his money on City, then when we lost at home to Everton we were told he should have bought the Toffees and built them a new ground rather than put money into a lost cause like City. This was before the attack on the waste of money on the academy which hadn't produced one first team player even after being open for a whole week end. When Pep arrived we had already moved into the regulation change phase. So I think it's a little more than fearing the dominant force. A cynic might feel there's some regional prejudice and even a touch of racism involved ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top