Of course Newcastle can try and persuade him to stay and they might be successful in doing so. They just can't turn down a release clause offer. The player can but I doubt a club would offer the release clause without having the go-ahead from the player's agent.Arsenal still met that clause in 2013. Liverpool managed persuaded him to stay for one more season and he moved on to Barcelona. No reason Newcastle could still do the same this time around.
Yes, I would’ve thought that was fairly obvious to most! I think Ray is getting a little confused.With a release clause don’t the current club just have to notify the player that they have received that amount and then the player decides yes or no?
In one way yes but the selling club could still ignore it like Liverpool did.With a release clause don’t the current club just have to notify the player that they have received that amount and then the player decides yes or no?
Liverpool didn't ignore anything they persuaded the player to change his mind and thus it made the release clause a moot point. You are conflating personal terms and a release clause.In one way yes but the selling club can still ignore like Liverpool did.
I think you need to understand the law of contract and tort a little better Ray, if the player has a release clause he chooses whether to exercise it, not the selling club.In one way yes but the selling club can still ignore like Liverpool did.
Suarez did want the Arsenal move (who wouldn't want to move away from Liverpool).Liverpool didn't ignore anything they persuaded the player to change his mind and thus it made the release clause a moot point. You are conflating personal terms and a release clause.
They really shouldn’t sell Isak. He’s their best player.Got a feeling he will decide to stay at Newcastle. He seems to like being the main man. Newcastle have others they can seek such as isak to raise funds
Saying that there have been plenty of transfers have not taken place despite a release clause had been met.The rags had become a cropper with that with Athletic Bilbao.I think you need to understand the law of contract and tort a little better Ray, if the player has a release clause he chooses whether to exercise it, not the selling club.
He would probably stay for one more season and then move.Got a feeling he will decide to stay at Newcastle. He seems to like being the main man. Newcastle have others they can seek such as isak to raise funds
Think they have some pretty good players tbh. I really rate botman, gordon, joelinton etc .They really shouldn’t sell Isak. He’s their best player.
Callum WIlson nearly went to Atletico MadridThey really shouldn’t sell Isak. He’s their best player.
Didn’t we have Laporte change his mind last minute as well? (He obviously joined circa 18 months later but still)Saying that there have been plenty of transfers have not taken place despite a release clause had been met.The rags had become a cropper with that with Athletic Bilbao.
All good players and Gordon would command a huge fee.Think they have some pretty good players tbh. I really rate botman, gordon, joelinton etc .
The real shame is them having to sell. It’s a sham tbh
-Laporte joined in Januarwhen Athetic Bilvao were so far off the pace.Didn’t we have Laporte change his mind last minute as well? (He obviously joined circa 18 months later but still)
Again they could have not extended his contract and fixed a better fee for themselves this summer.
I thought they were the richest club in the world ? Why do they need to sell.Think they have some pretty good players tbh. I really rate botman, gordon, joelinton etc .
The real shame is them having to sell. It’s a sham tbh
Financial Fair Play...The media loves to tout the assets of the PIF fund, but the reality that doesn't matter much with FFP. The reality is they aren't one of the richest clubs in the world by actual revenues.I thought they were the richest club in the world ? Why do they need to sell.