I think it's common knowledge the document was leaked to The times newspaper and many have speculated it came from Arsenal FC.Can you clear something up for me? Maguire in his PoF podcast said this "they have raised some intriguing points in the 165 page document which I had to read overnight so, thank you very much to person X who sent it to me from our good friends in the media, ....".
But on the WNRH podcast he didn't mention he has seen it and I think you confirmed he said he hasn't seen the "claim". So he has either had a Goldbridge moment, the document distributed to the clubs wasn't a redacted copy of the claim as Lawton said in his article, or he has decided he said something he shouldn't have said on the PoF podcast?
Not really important, it's just bothering me :)
I think it's common knowledge the document was leaked to The times newspaper and many have speculated it came from Arsenal FC.
The 165 page document was leaked, that's not in any doubt and I would imagine that it's done no favours to the PL at the arbitration court.
Expert's keep to facts , analyse those and make a intellectual judgment based on them.Well yes, I am just trying to clear up if Maguire has seen the "document" or the "claim" (if they are two different documents and not the same document redacted as Lawton said in the article). I have no problems if he did, only a problem if he said he did and then later said he didn't. Trust is a big thing when you are listening to "experts".
I think it's common knowledge the document was leaked to The times newspaper and many have speculated it came from Arsenal FC.
The 165 page document was leaked, that's not in any doubt and I would imagine that it's done no favours to the PL at the arbitration court.
A lot of people "have seen it" I would not believe anything said about any of our cases that make the media.I can’t remember where I heard it but it was said all he journalists had since seen he 165 page document. I’m assuming it was said on the POF pod by Maguire.
Email him direct at the Price of Football podcast via their websiteCan you clear something up for me? Maguire in his PoF podcast said this "they have raised some intriguing points in the 165 page document which I had to read overnight so, thank you very much to person X who sent it to me from our good friends in the media, ....".
But on the WNRH podcast he didn't mention he has seen it and I think you confirmed he said he hasn't seen the "claim". So he has either had a Goldbridge moment, the document distributed to the clubs wasn't a redacted copy of the claim as Lawton said in his article, or he has decided he said something he shouldn't have said on the PoF podcast?
Not really important, it's just bothering me :)
Exactly! People on here getting giddy thinking we’re all matey with them now. Give your heads a wobble them lot will fuck is over at any opportunity! Fuckin scumbags!probably. Rags are sneaky like that but above all else only looking out for their own interests. They may agree with us on spending restrictions but still stab us in the back on ffp.
Expert's keep to facts , analyse those and make a intellectual judgment based on them.
The UK media on the whole has already decided we are guilty.
The only experts you need to worry about are the independent PL panel and Arbitration panels verdicts.
The rest is just noise.
Email him direct at the Price of Football podcast via their website
Maguire stated clearly he had been sent the document. That was a stupid thing to say for an expert. I am sure he has seen the document but is now in delete mode.Well yes, I am just trying to clear up if Maguire has seen the "document" or the "claim" (if they are two different documents and not the same document redacted as Lawton said in the article). I have no problems if he did, only a problem if he said he did and then later said he didn't. Trust is a big thing when you are listening to "experts".
You want to know whether you can trust a particular journalist or not? Is that a serious question? Those days are long gone I'm afraid, and I'm talking decades.Whether we listen to the "noise" is up to each of us, I suppose. I don't mind listening to "experts" as long as I can trust what they are saying. I have learned a lot from the legal people on here, for example. I am trying to make up my mind whether I can trust Maguire or not.
Changing stories makes it more difficult to trust people. That's all I am saying.
You want to know whether you can trust a particular journalist or not? Is that a serious question? Those days are long gone I'm afraid, and I'm talking decades.
It is simple. Either he misspoke or got told to forget he was sent the document.Well yes, I am just trying to clear up if Maguire has seen the "document" or the "claim" (if they are two different documents and not the same document redacted as Lawton said in the article). I have no problems if he did, only a problem if he said he did and then later said he didn't. Trust is a big thing when you are listening to "experts".
The Spectator and Telegraph have used politics in a bitter struggle to fight off a hostile take over by “Abu Dhabi”.I read that article. Nothing but pure poison. They might be itk but they want us hung drawn and quartered.
I suspect the latter :)It is simple. Either he misspoke or got told to forget he was sent the document.
I don’t think Maguire said that in the podcast - he just he’d received the 165 page document from “our friends in the press” (Presumably Lawton). Who may well have since told him to never mention it again. The PL clubs each received a redacted document referring to the case but I believed that to be a summary of the dispute and not City’s statement of claim.I can’t remember where I heard it but it was said all he journalists had since seen he 165 page document. I’m assuming it was said on the POF pod by Maguire.
The board PL appointed or not would have to come up with irrefutable documented reasoning as to why they havent found in citys favour, it cant just be becuase the pl said so and the red top fans want it to be soLeaks, I'm afraid they can't stop themselves.
Their arrogance continues, perhaps this hubris is justified and a PL appointed Panel could not possibly find in City's favour, especially as a City victory would open the door for a damages claim.
But do the PL and their red controllers know that? Perhaps they think they are still in control?The board PL appointed or not would have to come up with irrefutable documented reasoning as to why they havent found in citys favour, it cant just be becuase the pl said so and the red top fans want it to be so
I'm assuming that if they know they are going to lose this case against us, that they take it as far as they can and then lose.But do the PL and their red controllers know that? Perhaps they think they are still in control?