Kamala Harris

Wow...

I don't think I could have been more stunned to find someone write that her 'illegal' and 'unjustifiable' reasoning to keep nonviolent prisoners beyond their term as possibly acceptable. That's real pretzel reasoning!

As for Amazon, I did not state the book could not be found at smaller distributors, but I asked why the biggest bookstore in the world online took it off their buying option.
Maybe because the author is a propagandist for Russia?
 
I don't think I could have been more stunned to find someone write that her 'illegal' and 'unjustifiable' reasoning to keep nonviolent prisoners beyond their term as possibly acceptable. That's real pretzel reasoning!

Well to be fair, in order for you to make the argument that uberhaupt she did something illegal, i would hope that you could present more source material than just opinion pieces. It's a bit premature for you to to rephrase my words as if i find illegal or unjustifyable actions acceptable (which i dont, no'r ever said i did) when really im making a more neutral impression that mainly flows out of really having too few information.

You give us the oppinion pieces, you arnt giving us the "actual smoking gun" in detail.
 
Last edited:
As for Amazon, I did not state the book could not be found at smaller distributors, but I asked why the biggest bookstore in the world online took it off their buying option.

Ask Jeff bezos?

I'm not sure why the question is presented to us, we sure aint going to be able to give a definitive answer, no'r do we need to assume that it is in any way relevant.
 
Maybe because the author is a propagandist for Russia?

I was waiting for some clown to say this at some point...

You don't have the first clue how the fairly modern 'Russia' propaganda started!! I'll clue you in, linked to the recent outage worldwide. Same guy! But, that's my research.

You stick with "Russian misinformation".

Not talking to you again today.
 
I was waiting for some clown to say this at some point...

You don't have the first clue how the fairly modern 'Russia' propaganda started!! I'll clue you in, linked to the recent outage worldwide. Same guy! But, that's my research.

You stick with "Russian misinformation".

Not talking to you again today.


Guys a shill who has his tongue up little vlads arse.



Tumblr_mg5p1gGjv11qap9gno1_500.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well to be fair, in order for you to make the argument that uberhaupt she did something illegal, i would hope that you could present more source material than just opinion pieces. It's a bit premature for you to to rephrase my words as if i find illegal or unjustifyable actions acceptable (which i dont, no'r ever said i did) when really im making a more neutral impression that mainly flows out of really having too few information.

You give us the oppinion pieces, you arnt giving us the "actual smoking gun" in detail.

I didn't "rephrase" your words. You found a reason why it may have been a good reason for her actions, therefore you made a 'plausible deniability' case for those actions.

When I get back from my hiatus, in a couple of days, I'll present; fair's fair.

But with that said, all the nuggets are there for you to find before I get back.
 
I was waiting for some clown to say this at some point...

You don't have the first clue how the fairly modern 'Russia' propaganda started!! I'll clue you in, linked to the recent outage worldwide. Same guy! But, that's my research.

You stick with "Russian misinformation".

Not talking to you again today.
What's your point in all this? Are you trying to claim that Harris is more morally corrupt than Trump in order to justify you being stupid enough to vote for the narcissistic orange-faced ****?
 

Guys a shill who has his tongue up little vlads arse.



That just means Bernie Sanders is also a Russian shill cos he's had visits to Russia too!

You're actually saying journalists, like 'The Grayzone', 'Electronic Intifada', cannot be believed at all because they don't work for MSM.

You may question the journalist, but he presents a factual record of Harris that you haven't bothered looking into.
 
That just means Bernie Sanders is also a Russian shill cos he's had visits to Russia too!

You're actually saying journalists, like 'The Grayzone', 'Electronic Intifada', cannot be believed at all because they don't work for MSM.

You may question the journalist, but he presents a factual record of Harris that you haven't bothered looking into.

Seems like a great source of information, how do you always find these people?

 
It should also be interesting if anyone starts looking into Act Blue over funding for Harris, and the 'supposedly' many hundreds of thousands of 'individuals' donating. Many of them thousands of times, without ever knowing of it ?
 
What's your point in all this? Are you trying to claim that Harris is more morally corrupt than Trump in order to justify you being stupid enough to vote for the narcissistic orange-faced ****?

Firstly, they are BOTH narcissistic. Both don't have great records.

But the current lauding and coronation of Kueen Kamala without investigation is a huge problem in MSM. Didn't you watch Tulsi Gabbard body and destroy her on the debate stage as she couldn't defend her state record in 2020??

The Dems need to hold an open primary for the actual best candidate.
 
I didn't "rephrase" your words. You found a reason why it may have been a good reason for her actions, therefore you made a 'plausible deniability' case for those actions.
Your accusing me of taking a certain stance where im seeking for reasons to justify actions ... which you have found condemnable.

But why are they condemnable? Thats the question i asked, i would like more per-case details.

Not that i was even seeking reasons to justify her actions on those per case matters to begin with, rather that i found it suspect that she would have continued her career as DA so long if her actions and decisions had been outright illegal.

Its a reasonable question to ask on allegations that she went outside the legal bounds of her job, if such allegations are true then why didnt it have any legal consequences till now and why does it only come up for review when she is in the position of presidential candidate?

You cant just make allegations that you took from oppinion pieces, and then scrutinize people as if they are willfully ignoring or justifying them if they scrutinize the correctness of the provided information.
 
I was waiting for some clown to say this at some point...

You don't have the first clue how the fairly modern 'Russia' propaganda started!! I'll clue you in, linked to the recent outage worldwide. Same guy! But, that's my research.

You stick with "Russian misinformation".

Not talking to you again today.
Get your tongue out of Trump’s arse.
 
Seems like a great source of information, how do you always find these people?


Aren't you interested in why ALL the journos talking about Dem issues are involved in 'sexual predatory' behaviour like Julian Assange, yet actual accounting for being in contact with real life predators like Epstein are ignored...?
 
Your accusing me of taking a certain stance where im seeking for reasons to justify actions ... which you have found condemnable.

But why are they condemnable? Thats the question i asked, i would like more per-case details.

Not that i was even seeking reasons to justify her actions on those per case matters to begin with, rather that i found it suspect that she would have continued her career as DA so long if her actions and decisions had been outright illegal.

Its a reasonable question to ask on allegations that she went outside the legal bounds of her job, if such allegations are true then why didnt it have any legal consequences till now and why does it only come up for review when she is in the position of presidential candidate?

You cant just make allegations that you took from oppinion pieces, and then scrutinize people as if they are willfully ignoring or justifying them if they scrutinize the correctness of the provided information.

As I said; on my return.

Enjoy your day, sir.
 
What's your point in all this? Are you trying to claim that Harris is more morally corrupt than Trump in order to justify you being stupid enough to vote for the narcissistic orange-faced ****?

That's a well thought out appraisal of the candidates.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top