Your accusing me of taking a certain stance where im seeking for reasons to justify actions ... which you have found condemnable.
But why are they condemnable? Thats the question i asked, i would like more per-case details.
Not that i was even seeking reasons to justify her actions on those per case matters to begin with, rather that i found it suspect that she would have continued her career as DA so long if her actions and decisions had been outright illegal.
Its a reasonable question to ask on allegations that she went outside the legal bounds of her job, if such allegations are true then why didnt it have any legal consequences till now and why does it only come up for review when she is in the position of presidential candidate?
You cant just make allegations that you took from oppinion pieces, and then scrutinize people as if they are willfully ignoring or justifying them if they scrutinize the correctness of the provided information.