Ivan Toney

[Blue warrior]

Off to Chelsea

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Off to Chelsea

Palmer off penalties?

 

[BringBackSwales]

Off to Chelsea

How the fuck can chelsea keep doing this and being ok with premier league psr requirements? We so much as fart and it’s 116

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

They’ll be a threat with him. Exactly what is missing from their team.

 

[xMatMcC]

They’ll be a threat with him. Exactly what is missing from their team.

Not a title threat until they start benching Enzo or Caicedo. They just don't work well together. Toney is not a big enough upgrade on Jackson to be a difference imo.

I'd be playing Caicedo and Lavia holding with Palmer in the 10/RCM. Nkunku playing off Toney with Neto and one of the other 100 wingers on the other side. Embarrassment of riches at Chelsea right now. Not sure how they'll get away with this.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Mercenary signs for the mercenaries.

 

[bluenova]

How the fuck can chelsea keep doing this and being ok with premier league psr requirements? We so much as fart and it’s 116

They're sailing on the very edge, but the plan is to clear out all the older players on high salaries and the "pure profit" Academy products, and to replace them with young players on lower salaries, and longer amortised contracts.

Last Summer, they sold or let go of, Havertz, Mount, Koulibaly, Kovacic, Pulisic, Mendy, Loftus-Cheek, Ampadu, Hudson-Odoi, Kante, Aubameyang, Azpilicueta, Babayoko etc., and loaned Ziyech, Kepa, Lukaku. That's a hell of a boost to their finances.

It's not quite the same, but similar to when City had that big spending splurge after Pep's first season. We didn't make huge amounts in fees, but got around a dozen ageing, big earners off the books, and spent the money on half that many younger players. Net spend looked poor, but overall it wasn't a huge change in the overall finances.

 

[Phil1]

Not that arsed. They would have been fighting it out for a top 6 place with or without him.

 

[SebastianBlue]

They're sailing on the very edge, but the plan is to clear out all the older players on high salaries and the "pure profit" Academy products, and to replace them with young players on lower salaries, and longer amortised contracts.

Last Summer, they sold or let go of, Havertz, Mount, Koulibaly, Kovacic, Pulisic, Mendy, Loftus-Cheek, Ampadu, Hudson-Odoi, Kante, Aubameyang, Azpilicueta, Babayoko etc., and loaned Ziyech, Kepa, Lukaku. That's a hell of a boost to their finances.

It's not quite the same, but similar to when City had that big spending splurge after Pep's first season. We didn't make huge amounts in fees, but got around a dozen ageing, big earners off the books, and spent the money on half that many younger players. Net spend looked poor, but overall it wasn't a huge change in the overall finances.

And our strategy at the time has seemed to work out reasonably well.

 

[Platt Lane 59]

Off to Chelsea

Thought he sure to join the Trafford Tramps ?
Then he would have instantly become England's #1 striker and a shoe-in to start as the number 9.
King Harry is now dead to the media...

 

[Fordyboy46]

As soon as they let one go one comes in, it's fucking barmy

 

[Mighty men]

They will need about 5 dressing rooms at this stage.

 

[BringBackSwales]

They're sailing on the very edge, but the plan is to clear out all the older players on high salaries and the "pure profit" Academy products, and to replace them with young players on lower salaries, and longer amortised contracts.

Last Summer, they sold or let go of, Havertz, Mount, Koulibaly, Kovacic, Pulisic, Mendy, Loftus-Cheek, Ampadu, Hudson-Odoi, Kante, Aubameyang, Azpilicueta, Babayoko etc., and loaned Ziyech, Kepa, Lukaku. That's a hell of a boost to their finances.

It's not quite the same, but similar to when City had that big spending splurge after Pep's first season. We didn't make huge amounts in fees, but got around a dozen ageing, big earners off the books, and spent the money on half that many younger players. Net spend loopoor, but overall it wasn't a huge change in the overall finances.

We spent nothing like Chelsea have over the last 2 years, not even close. Plus they aren’t allowed to use 8 year amortisation any more, 5 max. Clear cheating. To say “it’s not quite the same” as we did is a complete distortion of the truth. Their transfer fees, wages, squad size are completely off the scale, I’m not sure if you are being serious? In addition they’ve only got a small ground and no champions league football last year or this. Commercially not possible to be legal

 

[BringBackSwales]

If Toney goes to Chelsea great, they won’t be at the level of us and arsenal but might make it tougher for top 4/6 for the rags. Not seen this being reported outside of this forum though?

 

[Xhavenjoe]

They will need about 5 dressing rooms at this stage

They'd probably sell those as well, if they had them

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

If Toney goes to Chelsea great, they won’t be at the level of us and arsenal but might make it tougher for top 4/6 for the rags. Not seen this being reported outside of this forum though?

On the SSN yellow ticker.

 

[Gabriel]

Been sat watching my phone just on the off chance that Chelsea call.

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Been sat watching my phone just on the off chance that Chelsea call.

Don't take anything less than an 8 year contract mate.

 

[johnny crossan]

On the SSN yellow ticker.

Kaveh says it's a good fit, City only won because of Erling.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Kaveh says it's a good fit, City only won because of Erling.

No chance Chelsea will get top 4.

The media love in with these, despite their ridiculous spending and fiddling of the books by writing off billions of Abramovich loans and selling hotels to themselves is beyond neaseating.