Moving Away Fans / SSL3 /2 All City Fans.

600 a block SS1 but 110 is a lot smaller.
Good ....

We give circa 3000 seats in a 52k arena and get 2950 at ragland (73k) & arse (61k) & wet spam (60k)

Brentford give us 1200 & we give them 3000.....the rules are bollox.

Give them what they give us.

Sauce for the goose.......!!
 
No, it's like our SSL3. Away fans have their own entrances, and there is segregation at the top.

Saying that, home and away fans do cross over and mix as they make there way to the away end under the stand. It can get a bit boisterous, and has kicked off on occasions. There are plenty of Police and stewards around. Its a bit like United's forecourt, but under the stand.
....So there is opportunity for trouble !!
 
Good ....

We give circa 3000 seats in a 52k arena and get 2950 at ragland (73k) & arse (61k) & wet spam (60k)

Brentford give us 1200 & we give them 3000.....the rules are bollox.

Give them what they give us.

Sauce for the goose.......!!
Brentford give us about 1,700 it is Bournemouth and Luton which are closer to 1,200.

The rules are the rules, and we can't break them. Do you mind me asking where you sit now, as do you have any skin in the game?
 
Good ....

We give circa 3000 seats in a 52k arena and get 2950 at ragland (73k) & arse (61k) & wet spam (60k)

Brentford give us 1200 & we give them 3000.....the rules are bollox.

Give them what they give us.

Sauce for the goose.......!!
The rules as I understand them are you have to give 10% of capacity or 3,000 tickets to the away team, whichever figure is the lower. There might be a bit of wriggle room over 50 or so tickets due to segregation purposes etc, but we aren’t, under any circumstances going to be able to only offer circa 1,200 tickets to the opposition.

I’m all for having discussions about improving the atmosphere, but this proposal is a non starter as it simply won’t be allowed.
 
Segregation/safety/logistics will NOT be compromised but enhanced....no missiles raining down on City fans !!
People who throw shit can only throw downwards and not sideways? Aside from there being zero benefit to moving away fans, you've got a perfectly sectioned off away end that allows for the police to contain fans and manage any potential conflict with ease, they're never going to agree to anything that makes their job more difficult.
 
I can’t see this happening. The quick solution that probably wouldn’t affect many people, is to make the back say 10 rows of ss3 safe standing. Lots already stand there anyway and it would help to improve the atmosphere further down the stand.

Long term we could then think about making the rest of ss3 standing. You’d then have a large kind of home end, with the away fans still there as well.
 
People who throw shit can only throw downwards and not sideways? Aside from there being zero benefit to moving away fans, you've got a perfectly sectioned off away end that allows for the police to contain fans and manage any potential conflict with ease, they're never going to agree to anything that makes their job more difficult.
Its easier to manage fans in 1 ground level section than in 3 sections split over separate, higher levels....yes ?
 
We’ve already ascertained that the number of away fans displaced from SSL 2/3 won’t fit into the proposed blocks, meaning that most of 109 and 114 would also be needed to create this wall of pitchside away fans. So even more current singing SC holders displaced against their will. 107 would then be next to the away fans (and probably then standing, which the club won’t want) Even more of the ESL 1 concourse and all South exits lost. Major revenue loss for the club, giving away fans premium priced seats vs lower cost SSL3. All this to accommodate some theoretical fanatical singers who want to watch the game from L3, and who have the option to move to the new NSL2 anyway. Given very few people seem convinced of any benefit of implementing this, it sounds unlikely to me (thankfully).
 
Brentford give us about 1,700 it is Bournemouth and Luton which are closer to 1,200.

The rules are the rules, and we can't break them. Do you mind me asking where you sit now, as do you have any skin in the game?
No skin in the game other than to try and help improve the atmosphere in the stadium which, imo, has been generally poor since opening.

That opportunity now arises with the creation of 8000 extra seats in the NS ,and the ensuing migration of fans.

Again imo, these changes,along with those which i've raised, should be undertaken as one project and there is sufficient time twixt to plan and execute it.

The subject of segregation/fans mixing/aggro has been raised on here by a couple of posters but, again imo, at worst the status quo will prevail if not improved.

There are several potential 'flash points' around the stadium ie Metro station, Coach Park/ANR etc, but rarely any serious violence.

The walk back to town away from the stadium seems to be where the lads like to do their boxing.

Most considered & rational decision makers would arrive at the conclusion that the impact of this proposal is risk neutral with the added benefit of eliminating the danger of missiles being launched from SSL3 on to rival (City) fans below.

However, GMP,who until recently were operating under government special measures due to incompetence, couldnt run a bath, and are a slothful bunch of bone idle woke bastards hiding behind red tape and political correctness.

They couldnt recognise a risk free opportunity if it bit their leg.

They will need to be led by the nose and each of their groundless objections demolished by fact, logic and common sense.

Unfortunately common sense isnt very common !!

My seat is136, ESL3, block 305, Row E where my brothers and long time Kippax mates have 13 season tickets.

Two Ends are better than one !!

Happy New Year.
 
The rules as I understand them are you have to give 10% of capacity or 3,000 tickets to the away team, whichever figure is the lower. There might be a bit of wriggle room over 50 or so tickets due to segregation purposes etc, but we aren’t, under any circumstances going to be able to only offer circa 1,200 tickets to the opposition.

I’m all for having discussions about improving the atmosphere, but this proposal is a non starter as it simply won’t be allowed.
I know....... but we (and others) lose out both ways and i'm a belligerent oyld bastard !!

I
We’ve already ascertained that the number of away fans displaced from SSL 2/3 won’t fit into the proposed blocks, meaning that most of 109 and 114 would also be needed to create this wall of pitchside away fans. So even more current singing SC holders displaced against their will. 107 would then be next to the away fans (and probably then standing, which the club won’t want) Even more of the ESL 1 concourse and all South exits lost. Major revenue loss for the club, giving away fans premium priced seats vs lower cost SSL3. All this to accommodate some theoretical fanatical singers who want to watch the game from L3, and who have the option to move to the new NSL2 anyway. Given very few people seem convinced of any benefit of implementing this, it sounds unlikely to me (thankfully).
Faint heart ne'er won a fair lady.

An estmated 2700 fans can be accomodated in 110,111 & 113.

The club and the GMP/Licencing Authority have arbitarily,when the occasion suits them, reduced an away clubs allocation by upto 500 tix to a total of 2450.

This may have peeved the clubs but wasnt objected to by the PL.

Try looking for solutions not problems, things might get done then.
 
I know....... but we (and others) lose out both ways and i'm a belligerent oyld bastard !!

I

Faint heart ne'er won a fair lady.

An estmated 2700 fans can be accomodated in 110,111 & 113.

The club and the GMP/Licencing Authority have arbitarily,when the occasion suits them, reduced an away clubs allocation by upto 500 tix to a total of 2450.

This may have peeved the clubs but wasnt objected to by the PL.

Try looking for solutions not problems, things might get done then.
“An estmated 2700 fans can be accomodated in 110,111 & 113” - no they can’t.

I regard this ill conceived plan as the problem, the solution is to abandon it.
 
“An estmated 2700 fans can be accomodated in 110,111 & 113” - no they can’t.

I regard this ill conceived plan as the problem, the solution is to abandon it.

We get it. You don't want it to happen.

Maybe you do want it to happen, but you are convinced and adamant the club won't do it.

Which is fair enough.

The new North stand should be operational midway through or to the latter part of next season depending on the construction time table not falling behind schedule.

Not that I think the club will move the away fans from SSL3. But if they do, that won't happen until the 2026/27 season.

Next season will be about selling and allocating seats on NSL2.
 
One more point.

If the club want it to happen, it can and will happen, regardless of some issues with seating configurations.

As we all know, the club can do what it wants, and has shown that in the past when they have changed seating configurations on tiers, and have moved fans around the ground en-masse.
 
Last edited:
One more point.

If the club wanted to happen, it can and will happen, regardless of some issues with seating configurations.

As we all know, the club can do what it wants, and has shown that in the past when they have changed seating configurations on tiers, and have moved fans around the ground en-nasse.
You’re correct, I think it’s a bad idea. But that’s my opinion (and that of others) which is a subjective opinion. What is not subjective is the number of seats in blocks 110/111/113. As you helped to confirm with your seat count and the 3D map these blocks hold only 1500 ( fifteen hundred) seats. You cannot put 3000 people in the space for 1500 ( well except at the swamp!)

To house 3000 away fans on L1 you need all of 109 and 114. That is the reality people should be asked to comment on.
 
You’re correct, I think it’s a bad idea. But that’s my opinion (and that of others) which is a subjective opinion. What is not subjective is the number of seats in blocks 110/111/113. As you helped to confirm with your seat count and the 3D map these blocks hold only 1500 ( fifteen hundred) seats. You cannot put 3000 people in the space for 1500 ( well except at the swamp!)

To house 3000 away fans on L1 you need all of 109 and 114. That is the reality people should be asked to comment on.

And others think it's a good idea. :-)

You've lost me.

3000 people in a space of 1500 people?

Current SSL2 away blocks, current SSL1 away blocks, and blocks 111, 110, and half of block 114. Current home blocks. How many seats does that add up to?

109, 110, 111 and half of 114 would be well over 1000 seats. Until an exact count is done on blocks 111, 110, and half of 114, we won't know if any, and how many additional seats would be needed in block 109, if any, to accommodate the away fans from SSL3. ATM it's subjective and a guestimate. Nobody has the exact seat numbers for each block. Get counting on the seat planner ! :-)
 
And others think it's a good idea. :-)

You've lost me.

3000 people in a space of 1500 people?

Current SSL2 away blocks, current SSL1 away blocks, and blocks 111, 110, and half of block 114. Current home blocks. How many seats does that add up to?

109, 110, 111 and half of 114 would be well over 1000 seats. Until an exact count is done on blocks 111, 110, and half of 114, we won't know if any, and how many additional seats would be needed in block 109, if any, to accommodate the away fans from SSL3. ATM it's subjective and a guestimate. Nobody has the exact seat numbers for each block. Get counting on the seat planner ! :-)
Isn’t that why we have a seat counting group…..!
 
110/111/113 hold 1500. No need to get personal, it’s not my fault you can’t do hard sums. Anyway I’ll leave you do a recount, I’m off to the game.
Nothing personal.....

and its not my fault that i cant do sums, hard or easy !!

Enjoy the game,where do you sit ?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top