United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keeper! said:
Watching the numerous Sky Sports videos on Youtube of Neville and Carragher on the rag vs dippers game on Sunday says everything, whatever happened to neutral, unbiased commentary/punditry ?

Absolutely appalling that the leading broadcaster in the country allows this to happen, and the cameras showing them doing the commentary are so revealing, both Neville and Carragher are foul mouthed, uncouth , horrible individuals, and it says a lot about Sky, the organization they represent.
Click to expand...
And this is why I took great enjoyment in cancelling my sky contract on Sunday. When I was asked why I was cancelling I told em - I’m sick to death of your rag and victims biased organisation and I’m no longer prepared to watch that rat faced and spitty **** any longer - I wouldn’t keep if it was free.
 
middlewichblue said:
And this is why I took great enjoyment in cancelling my sky contract on Sunday. When I was asked why I was cancelling I told em - I’m sick to death of your rag and victims biased organisation and I’m no longer prepared to watch that rat faced and spitty **** any longer - I wouldn’t keep if it was free.
Click to expand...
They must be tired of hearing that. I gave them exactly the same reason last year.
 
Fred_Quimby said:
They must be tired of hearing that. I gave them exactly the same reason last year.
Click to expand...
I did the same outside an Asda store a couple of years back after the salesman clocked my City shirt and asked if I wanted to subscribe to watch my team winning trophies.
After telling him I don't need it as I've got a season ticket and watch away games I can't get tickets for via less Rag/Dipper centric (and cheaper) sources, I got the distinct impression it wasn't the first time the salesman had heard someone telling them that they basically wouldn't give Sly the steam off their piss.
 
middlewichblue said:
And this is why I took great enjoyment in cancelling my sky contract on Sunday. When I was asked why I was cancelling I told em - I’m sick to death of your rag and victims biased organisation and I’m no longer prepared to watch that rat faced and spitty **** any longer - I wouldn’t keep if it was free.
Click to expand...
I’ve kept it …..it’s free… even sweeter denying them a source of income…..
 
middlewichblue said:
I wouldn’t keep if it was free.
Click to expand...
Ha! The exact same phrase I used when I cancelled them years and years ago.

I genuinely would not have that organisation anywhere near me even if indeed it was free.
I find it abhorrent that people like Carragher are being paid a wage packet after that incident where he spat at that kid. Ratboy is an offence to human nature because he exists, and the whole Sly Sports package is a rag/dipper fan club that we pay for.

Last night's game saw Ian Wright with his usual irritating buffoonery, and Les Ferdinand looking for all the world like he'd enjoy nothing better than delivering a devastatingly powerful right uppercut to Wright's jawbone.
But the game was free to air so it was no effort to silence the hyperactive court jester with the remote control.
And that is one of the things that angers me the most: the banal, mundane and utterly tedious ramblings of the pundits we are forced to listen to - before, during and after a live game. Either at the ground or in the studio, the same old former 'legends' of the game dragged out in front of the cameras in order to inform the viewers that 'If he wants to score goals he's gotta put the ball in the back of the net, 'cos blasting it three yards over the top ain't no good.'
 
Is the scruffy twat having a trestle table top sale in his garage or will he be paying a small fee to Gumtree or eBay….. I suspect the former
 
Love it .
[emoji599][emoji2788] Paul Scholes on INEOS: “They have been in charge [of Manchester United] for nearly a year now and everything is still negative. I can’t think of something positive that they’ve done for the football club.”

“Things are getting worse on the football pitch so couldn’t they have just said that they’d do cheaper tickets – couldn’t they just give us something positive. How can you ask Manchester United fans to pay more money with what’s on the football pitch.”

“£66 for a ticket is ridiculous. If you think of Manchester, there are so many deprived areas and Sir Jim Ratcliffe himself is from Failsworth – which is a deprived area. If you take one kid with you, that’s £120, if you take a family, you’re looking at £300-400 – it’s not right.”

“Where do these owners get the front to put ticket prices up? For the value – we’re probably having our worst ever Premier League season and they’ve got the cheek to put the prices up."

“There is nothing positive happening with that football club. The team look bang average. They’re not doing anything for fans. If we’ve got Sir Jim Ratcliffe, compared to all these American owners, who’s been a United fan since growing up in an area in Manchester – he’s still hiking prices up. It just shows that they don’t care."

Spot on Scholesy![emoji122]
 
shemnel said:
selling garnacho would be foolish of them, he's not a world beater but does regularly turnout good cameos. But then, what do you expect from the world's bestest ever corner turning club ever ever.
Click to expand...
He's one of the very few players I'd have off the rags, the other being Dalot.
 
bakerdave76 said:
Love it .
[emoji599][emoji2788] Paul Scholes on INEOS: “They have been in charge [of Manchester United] for nearly a year now and everything is still negative. I can’t think of something positive that they’ve done for the football club.”

“Things are getting worse on the football pitch so couldn’t they have just said that they’d do cheaper tickets – couldn’t they just give us something positive. How can you ask Manchester United fans to pay more money with what’s on the football pitch.”

“£66 for a ticket is ridiculous. If you think of Manchester, there are so many deprived areas and Sir Jim Ratcliffe himself is from Failsworth – which is a deprived area. If you take one kid with you, that’s £120, if you take a family, you’re looking at £300-400 – it’s not right.”

“Where do these owners get the front to put ticket prices up? For the value – we’re probably having our worst ever Premier League season and they’ve got the cheek to put the prices up."

“There is nothing positive happening with that football club. The team look bang average. They’re not doing anything for fans. If we’ve got Sir Jim Ratcliffe, compared to all these American owners, who’s been a United fan since growing up in an area in Manchester – he’s still hiking prices up. It just shows that they don’t care."

Spot on Scholesy![emoji122]
Click to expand...
"Scholesy"....?

giphy.gif


I think Sir Scruff and INEOS are doing a bang up job. Bleed the fuckers dry.
 
Now there’s a video on MediaCity Auntie Beeb’s website called “The game that saved Fergie’s Job?” and one to do with the women’s team and eyebrows.

What is it with them?. Rag Tourettes?
 
KentBlue said:
Ha! The exact same phrase I used when I cancelled them years and years ago.

I genuinely would not have that organisation anywhere near me even if indeed it was free.
I find it abhorrent that people like Carragher are being paid a wage packet after that incident where he spat at that kid. Ratboy is an offence to human nature because he exists, and the whole Sly Sports package is a rag/dipper fan club that we pay for.

Last night's game saw Ian Wright with his usual irritating buffoonery, and Les Ferdinand looking for all the world like he'd enjoy nothing better than delivering a devastatingly powerful right uppercut to Wright's jawbone.
But the game was free to air so it was no effort to silence the hyperactive court jester with the remote control.
And that is one of the things that angers me the most: the banal, mundane and utterly tedious ramblings of the pundits we are forced to listen to - before, during and after a live game. Either at the ground or in the studio, the same old former 'legends' of the game dragged out in front of the cameras in order to inform the viewers that 'If he wants to score goals he's gotta put the ball in the back of the net, 'cos blasting it three yards over the top ain't no good.'
Click to expand...
The tourists may not be aware of this tbf......
 
bakerdave76 said:
Love it .
[emoji599][emoji2788] Paul Scholes on INEOS: “They have been in charge [of Manchester United] for nearly a year now and everything is still negative. I can’t think of something positive that they’ve done for the football club.”

“Things are getting worse on the football pitch so couldn’t they have just said that they’d do cheaper tickets – couldn’t they just give us something positive. How can you ask Manchester United fans to pay more money with what’s on the football pitch.”

“£66 for a ticket is ridiculous. If you think of Manchester, there are so many deprived areas and Sir Jim Ratcliffe himself is from Failsworth – which is a deprived area. If you take one kid with you, that’s £120, if you take a family, you’re looking at £300-400 – it’s not right.”

“Where do these owners get the front to put ticket prices up? For the value – we’re probably having our worst ever Premier League season and they’ve got the cheek to put the prices up."

“There is nothing positive happening with that football club. The team look bang average. They’re not doing anything for fans. If we’ve got Sir Jim Ratcliffe, compared to all these American owners, who’s been a United fan since growing up in an area in Manchester – he’s still hiking prices up. It just shows that they don’t care."

Spot on Scholesy![emoji122]
Click to expand...
Scruffy Jim said he’s going to knock us off our perch.

Isn’t that a positive?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top