Its where wayne rooney settles his disputesI’ve heard of the small claims court.
I’ve never heard of the fat claims court before.
He’s very well qualified, either way.
Its where wayne rooney settles his disputesI’ve heard of the small claims court.
I’ve never heard of the fat claims court before.
He’s very well qualified, either way.
So he didn’t say there are no rules ? Funny because that’s what I thought he said as wellHave you listened to what he said, rather than reading the somewhat misleading headline?
And whilst your last sentence may be correct at least he’s addressed the elephant in the room.
I thought we would accept the non cooperation charges but now I think City will go for 100% winI guess we'd take some sort of no cooperation one as assuming we've not said fill your boots here's the keys etc a fine for not giving everything they've asked for is subjective.
I’m obliged, MLF :-)I’ve heard of the small claims court.
I’ve never heard of the fat claims court before.
He’s very well qualified, either way.
And all we've had since is mis-reporting that we were found guilty of financial breaches, no matter how many times the "no evidence" from the court's judgement is shownProbably, and I've no doubt that should that happen and we get fined they will.
The CAS result showed that and we just sucked the minor miscellaneous up.
There’s a few ways to interpret what was said. What he says about the PL having no authority is the most pertinent and interesting part though, rather than the no rules comment which exists only to setup the assertion of the lack of authority. It’s not been asserted enough, or at all, until now.So he didn’t say there are no rules ? Funny because that’s what I thought he said as well
If you can’t see how the headline is misleading in relation to what he said overall, then I’d say your English comprehension is deficient.So he didn’t say there are no rules ? Funny because that’s what I thought he said as well
Or we wont know what we've done but if we dont know they're not gonna tell us
Do your best, send the pics and I’ll sort at my end.Zoom on my camera aint that good
If you can’t see how the headline is misleading in relation to what he said overall, then I’d say your English comprehension is deficient.
But but but they were able to “get somewhere” with Everton, Forest and Leicester.If City win the case, there are no rules
There are no rules anymore
It's just gone
It's just gone because the authority of the Premier League will be utterly destroyed
I don't see how the PL Board could survive, because they've spent four or five years to get nowhere
Penny dropped !If City win the case, there are no rules
There are no rules anymore
It's just gone
It's just gone because the authority of the Premier League will be utterly destroyed
I don't see how the PL Board could survive, because they've spent four or five years to get nowhere
In regard to what?Penny dropped !
Does this really need explaining?
Being in the room gives you insight and an advantage. As opposed to being outside the room and knowing fuck all.Hence the question..
I’m struggling to see your point. He’s unequivocally stated that if we win the PL is fucked. ‘Get[ting] nowhere’ means they have not been able to establish anything. It’s a fairly accurate ex tempore assessment of the position post a finding in our favour.If City win the case, there are no rules
There are no rules anymore
It's just gone
It's just gone because the authority of the Premier League will be utterly destroyed
I don't see how the PL Board could survive, because they've spent four or five years to get nowhere
Being in the room gives you insight and an advantage. As opposed to being outside the room and knowing fuck all.
Fair point but I think if we're going for the costs involved in defending the club completely exonerated would leave us in a far stronger position.I guess we'd take some sort of no cooperation one as assuming we've not said fill your boots here's the keys etc a fine for not giving everything they've asked for is subjective.