Yes.Are you there at 11am? if so i will see you there
See you later.
Yes.Are you there at 11am? if so i will see you there
Not directly as far as I can tell. Both the planning documents and the Design Statement only show the cables going to those anchor points at the end of the newly erected beams. That said I think half of the roof beyond that point may be translucent panels which presumably are lightweight.The two cable towers will anchor them.
Watched the last one being delivered on Wednesday...MASSIVE !!


I thought that's what I'd described...the two huge frames at either end of the construction.....as explained by Sisk on Wednesday.Not directly as far as I can tell. Both the planning documents and the Design Statement only show the cables going to those anchor points at the end of the newly erected beams. That said I think half of the roof beyond that point may be translucent panels which presumably are lightweight.
View attachment 150440
View attachment 150443
Happolds do seem to really like their robust connections, there has been a theme of it all along here. On the tower, the transfers, corners, skybar etc. You can see there how beefy the ends of the beam connections are, and then the cross beam between them all is a hell of a depth too.And still a third of that length to get bolted on to the end. Is it really just a bolted connection to take it to the end of the existing roof? Surely I'm missing something obvious there?
From @cpoverview s video.
View attachment 150420
Posted before reading your following messages. I'm not sure people are getting the point you are making.Not directly as far as I can tell. Both the planning documents and the Design Statement only show the cables going to those anchor points at the end of the newly erected beams. That said I think half of the roof beyond that point may be translucent panels which presumably are lightweight.
View attachment 150440
View attachment 150443
I wonder if the 1/3rd beams will have their own eyelet that 'interlocks' over those ones and then pivots down to meet the flat where it connects. Then the cable effectively hooks both. Possibly too far from the edge for that. One to watch.
Looking back at images of the south stand it appears the same ie.the front extension pieces are bolted/ welded and the roof is a lightweight “see thru”constructionI wonder if the 1/3rd beams will have their own eyelet that 'interlocks' over those ones and then pivots down to meet the flat where it connects. Then the cable effectively hooks both. Possibly too far from the edge for that. One to watch.
I wonder if the 1/3rd beams will have their own eyelet that 'interlocks' over those ones and then pivots down to meet the flat where it connects. Then the cable effectively hooks both. Possibly too far from the edge for that. One to watch.
Good spot.![]()
There are bolt holes on the top face as well as the end. I’ll bet it’s quite a hefty connection plate on both beams.
Nothing radical that's not already in the public domain,but interesting and enjoyable.Looking forward to any insights gained from the Sisk Open Day event
So hinged from the cable connection? That's innovative thinking.I wonder if the 1/3rd beams will have their own eyelet that 'interlocks' over those ones and then pivots down to meet the flat where it connects. Then the cable effectively hooks both. Possibly too far from the edge for that. One to watch.
Hinged as well as bolted. But nothing to back that at all, just a thought.So hinged from the cable connection? That's innovative thinking.
Ahh, well spotted. I don't suppose anyone knows why I have to turn off or pause the VPN to see that picture BTW?![]()
There are bolt holes on the top face as well as the end. I’ll bet it’s quite a hefty connection plate on both beams.
What were your own impressions of it?I've got to be honest.
The other Blue Moon forum members who were at the event this morning will confirm this.
Sisk asked everyone who was at the Open Doors event not to post any pictures and videos of the stand on social media, including fan forums. The pictures and videos taken from the viewing platform are NDA'd.
I wrote the questions on a piece paper that people on here and on SSC-MCR wanted me to ask Sisk. I've left the questions with Sisk. Sisk have promised to get back to me about the questions via email.
I've done a construction picture roundup which I'll post later today.
What were your own impressions of it?
Carl Brierley? If so fair play to Sisk for not paying the event lip service.The event?
It was very informative. Carl from Sisk who hosted most of the event went into quite a lot of detail about how Sisk work as a construction company, and how they have constructed the stand so far, and what it has involved.
The Q&A session was very good. I've left the questions with Carl.
As for the views of the stand from the viewing platform, they were great.
It's just a shame the pictures can't be posted.
Yes.Carl Brierley? If so fair play to Sisk for not paying the event lip service.