You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 20,421
- Team supported
- Manchester City
There's some interesting stuff in here....
The way that is explained it sounds even more like a Whitchunt
hmm, lived at both ends at some pointYou must be from the wrong side of Droylsden ....
Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
forgot to add Barney Ronay & Liew in the Guardian chorus line of City hating blisters along with their rag anatomist Jonty Wilson, Hattenstone, Conn, Shindler etc and that's just one paper. May I remind you of the historic full cast?
View attachment 151147
Would not share a tear if they were taken out, sniper or thrown off the roof at City!
PaulPowerScreamer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,039
Yes I've just checked and the last 100 pages have been added in just 17 hours including a night so will probably be at 10,000 by end of play on SundayUnless it’s announced by tomorrow morning your aspiration will be met I reckon.
Edit, sorry it's 28 hours, maths fail!
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 15,705
There's some interesting stuff in here....
As we still don't have a decision let's talk for the millionth time about when we might get one, what it might say and what it might mean:
Q1. When will we get a decision?
A. We don't know. Sometime in the future is the most likely answer.
Q2. What might the decision be?
A. We don't know. It could be in the PL's favour or in City's.
Q3. What might it mean if City are found guilty, or indeed cleared?
A. We don't know. It could be bad for City or indeed it could be bad for the PL.
Q4. Shall we do this again next week and drag it out for an hour?
A. Book me in.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Nice work if you can get it!As we still don't have a decision let's talk for the millionth time about when we might get one, what it might say and what it might mean:
Q1. When will we get a decision?
A. We don't know. Sometime in the future is the most likely answer.
Q2. What might the decision be?
A. We don't know. It could be in the PL's favour or in City's.
Q3. What might it mean if City are found guilty, or indeed cleared?
A. We don't know. It could be bad for City or indeed it could be bad for the PL.
Q4. Shall we do this again next week and drag it out for an hour?
A. Book me in.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Also, failing FFP isn't cheating. If it is then that makes United cheats too.We didn't fail, we signed a settlement not to take it any further as it was easier than going to court over it
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
But only minor cheats…Also, failing FFP isn't cheating. If it is then that makes United cheats too.
It isn't particularly nice work - I do it for fun largely because its filmed as live and is testing to be put on the spot. Nor was this summary from Super88 what was said and, as surprising as it may be, very many people do not have as deep an understanding of all aspects of this case as those who have participated in 10,000 pages of debate on here.Nice work if you can get it!
If you are referring to the 2014 case, there was a settlement between UEFA and City in which it was explicitly stated the City did not accept they had broken any rules.We failed UEFA FFP early on and paid a huge fine.
eastmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 10,234
- Team supported
- Manchester city
Soft signal is the new buzz wordSoft signal?
danielwood5
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2012
- Messages
- 1,355
That looks like the front page of a newspaper the day after a grooming gangs been busted.forgot to add Barney Ronay & Liew in the Guardian chorus line of City hating blisters along with their rag anatomist Jonty Wilson, Hattenstone, Conn, Shindler etc and that's just one paper. May I remind you of the historic full cast?
View attachment 151147
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
you cant win some want up dates kept informed when nothing new happening on flip side old news nothing new waste of timeIt isn't particularly nice work - I do it for fun largely because its filmed as live and is testing to be put on the spot. Nor was this summary from Super88 what was said and, as surprising as it may be, very many people do not have as deep an understanding of all aspects of this case as those who have participated in 10,000 pages of debate on here.
but for me it's reassuring and confirms what we believe whatever out come ( innocent) the PL have dug a hole and appear to still be digging
Plays By Sense Of Smell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 12,062
Breadbun? What’s a breadbun?
And yet he claims he has not profited from the 115 case!Nice work if you can get it!
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
There's some interesting stuff in here....
Was interesting. But, Jamie Jackson. Jesus, how can he be a journalist without being able to string a sort of sentence together, you know?
Petrovs left peg
Well-Known Member
Makes Bez sound intelligentWas interesting. But, Jamie Jackson. Jesus, how can he be a journalist without being able to string a sort of sentence together, you know?
Marvin.
Well-Known Member
That's the format. Or do you hold with the Victorians that physiognomy speaks to a person's character, if such a thing exists?That looks like the front page of a newspaper the day after a grooming gangs been busted.