You have to be clever or obtuse to understand that,which bracket do you fit into?
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
My version of that was: “They can spend what they like, subject only to a maximum debt rule”. The need to not double up on UEFA rules is clear.
abu13
Well-Known Member
This is the argument i love having with our detractors, basically they are accusing us of dodgy dealing and off the record payments. They have been and continue to demand investigations to try and uncover the evidence but cant find any. And then we are expected to believe the very people who want us charged for dodgy accounting have been bought off with backhanders.
In reality if this was the case all it would take is for one person to come forward as a whistleblower and we would be bang to rights and tarnished forever.
Funny how nobody ever has done isnt it :)
Not if the PL can help it.
I’m dim & acute mate, so fuck knows ;)
Exactly the point CAS made. The conspiracy required is just not credible.
Yeah but if your nightmare scenario is “what if someone does a Chelsea” and Chelsea are fine then it’s not really a nightmare?!
See, you've made me go there now
Man City expulsion? FFP punishments ranked by how much it will impact Pep Guardiola's side
The pitch forks are out amid fresh 'expulsion' claims as we await the verdict on Manchester City's alleged 115 breaches of FFP. How will they feel about their potential sanctions?www.football365.com
Man City 'expulsion' is 'on the table' for 'the first time' as 52-page document is released amid 'farce' claims
Potential "expulsion" is now "on the table" for Man City "for the first time" if they are found guilty of their financial charges, Keith Wyness suggests.
Man City FFP 'expulsion' leads £78m star to Arsenal as Barcelona beat Real Madrid to midfielder
The FFP trial has finally begun and we've reassigned the Man City players on the assumption that they will be dumped from the Premier League.
just from 2 minutes looking
What is it you think you’ve found? No one has said F365 never cover the charges (that would be pretty weird), and reporting high profile comments from Liverpools mayor is not evidence of some anti-City editorial policy.
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
Come on, jeez.
Media literacy on here is awful. We frequently see people mistake a journalist reporting a quote as the journalist saying the quote, as well as blaming news outlets for the accuracy of their user comments FFS.
I read F365 most days because it’s a good aggregator. Sometimes they try a bit hard to be funny, but they’ve got nothing against the club unless your standard is that everyone less committed to City than Pete the badge is part of a campaign against the club.
Then again, there is literally not a single news outlet in the sport that hasn’t been deemed to be part of the rag dipper media conspiracy so I don’t know why I even bother pointing out when someone talks that bollocks for the 8,000th time.