Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 20,709
The Club and legacy fans / fan reps have acquiesced in making more tickets available for tourists. Maybe unintentionally. Why else have we got non attendance requiring season cards. Why else have we got guaranteed 12 game refunds on the Ticket Exchange?Thanks for the interesting comment.
This has been covered elsewhere but we know for a fact that City's non-seasoncard support has surged and there is an old but quality dataset that suggests that the majority of City's seasoncard holders live outside Greater ManChester. We also know from the club that 50% of seasoncard holders do not on average go to the midweek CL games.
I believe that City's support has surged locally, nationally and internationally since the takeover and that we see these fans at games. Ironically, I think on a CL night, the crowd is dominated by locals from what is now a very cosmopolitan Manchester.
We are living in a period when football is extremely popular and in one where prices have never been higher so football crowds are changing. It is confusing but at the same time interesting. When I first started supporting City in the 1970s, football was almost all white now it has totally changed and City fans represent the community in which the club is based. This is social progress. That doesn't mean that there aren't problems between the club and fanbase. We know there are.
You commented that City that City are encouraging overseas fan at the expense of local fans. I disagree with that and think that we have seen a big increase in both occasional visiting City fans from abroad and local fans.
I think it’s about making money (the Club) and reclaiming money (the fans).
I’m talking tourists and not Mancunian Blues (or genuine fans) of any ethnicity.
The impact has been to deprive families from getting season cards together during the most successful spell in our history
Last edited: