BrianW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2006
- Messages
- 6,561
- Team supported
- There's Only One City
Hmm. What you describe in councils is not corrupt. Councils enter into binding purchasing contracts based on the lowest tender. They then have to buy from the supplier at the agreed price. To do otherwise is to break the contract, which makes them liable to be sued.Everything's corrupt though isn't it to some degree. Councils spending money on all sorts of vanity schemes when by law they're supposed to do the best for their residents. £15 for a printer cartridge with 10ml of ink, when you can but a litre at trade price for around £1 a litre or less (that's a 15,000% markup). Speed cameras raking in hundreds of millions despite statistical proof that they're not reducing the accident rate by any significant degree, if at all. £1000 for a laptop that cost £50 to make. Where do you want to draw the line?
This is the normal practice across the public sector and has been in place for a long time. The alternative would be not to have a purchasing contract and let individual members of staff buy randomly from whoever. Would the latter work out cheaper across multi-million-pound organisations? Colour me doubtful at best.